***Bible versus Science


[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ HOURGLASS2 ARCHIVES ]

Posted by WW on March 18, 1999 at 18:57:55 {MWOuU2yvobPRY}:

In Reply to: **Bible versus Science posted by AF on March 18, 1999 at 10:20:06:


Hi AF,
Wait a minute.

You know more about physics than a Phd Physicist? It's on record, as is his Theology Phd. What is it, is there no one who can explain a viable theory besides the one that says, we are not created, engineered and the universe is just a blind chance?

Maybe I phrased my question wrong or haven't grasped what HAWKING is saying in his book. He has referred to 'God' several times. First cause is not what caused the initial expansion of the universe from the gravity of it's 'black hole'?

The universe is still expanding and has been expanding for 15-20 billion years. If it was 'static' then it would have required no first cause, right?

Would you please tell me what you believe is true, as far as deism goes? After all, you said you are not atheist. I am curious as to how you think we began and what the nature of God is to you.
Please enlighten me!! (seriously)

WW


Follow Ups:

  • ****Bible versus Science AF 06:04:26 3/19/99 (2)
  • *****Bible versus Science Jaypeeto 17:20:59 3/19/99 (0)
  • *****Bible versus Science Thanks-WW-nim 15:42:19 3/19/99 (0)

    [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ HOURGLASS2 ARCHIVES ]

    Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

    1