Posted by Morgan on March 17, 1999 at 18:03:40 {MWLtoheUovtfo}:
In Reply to: ***Proposed FPP Amendments posted by Moderator 14 on March 16, 1999 at 20:16:23:
The matter of 'lying' can get pretty subjective. What level of 'proof' is required. Is it going to be a matter of whose ox is gored or some
attempt at objectivity. There's a post on the board right now in which someone is called a
liar and there is no lie involved. There's maybe
some obfuscation but that's about it. After a discussion with Rick I've decided to let it sit for the moment but I consider it very marginal.
I'm guessing but maybe you are referring to the blood doctine post by Rosetta. With such a post, why not get involved in the thread? Not as a moderator, but offer some valid points to refute the position if you disagree with it. If you feel no wrong was committed, then say why not. In any thread that you believe the poster is mistaken (I'm not referring to flagrant violations), then involve yourself as a participant of the board.
I remember a great thread a while back in which Seeker explained why he felt the WBTS was a 'false prophet'. An individual whose name I can't recall (pea eye or something like that) offered many points as to why he disagreed with Seeker. Certainly seeker's mind was made up, but mine wasn't and while I was only an observer, I felt I had learned a lot from the discourse.