Posted by tobor on March 17, 1999 at 06:35:59 {MWfPLG5L29fHA}:
In Reply to: **A Tale of Three ENDS posted by J.H. on March 16, 1999 at 11:01:55:
a second post.
I think the derived meaning is too shakey a ground
on which to build such a large structure of doctrine- much of what the Society publishes is
nothing more than speculation asserted as fact.
I notice non
sequitors in WT articles like
the wheat and the tares recently - it's natural
interpretation would eliminate the whole idea
of the organization since the separating work
is done by angels who separate by BURNING the
weeds.