Posted by J.H. on March 16, 1999 at 20:51:21 {MWKQmDRkic4cM}:
In Reply to: **Fusion of Science & Religion posted by Tallyman on March 16, 1999 at 20:00:47:
TT,
: You must've missed the last, critical sentence:
No, I did not.
: "Herein lies the fusion of true science with true religion."
The use of the word "true" merely demonstrates my point: you know nothing about science. Something based on anything but observation and rational thought would not, by definition, be science. It would be religion. What you want to do is totally abolish science, and in its place put a form of religion. This is not new. The proper name for the period when this ideology was dominant is "The Dark Ages". This is what you want to recreate.
If you disagree with the above, please explain how science and religion can be harmonized, and explain what in science
should be replaced by new principles more compatible with religion. Not the results you want (pre-determining results is another thing science can't do, but religions do all the time), but the methods.