NFA COMMENT:16 October 2002 NFA Newswire
Item 1: Media Report; Concealed weapon permit unlikely for shooting victimThat article is quite interesting, because it demonstrates
that the Authorization to Carry required by people at risk
is not available. In the words of the Supreme Court of
Canada (SCC), the Authorization to Carry (ATC) is apparently
"a specially-tailored defence to a particular charge" [ in
this case, Criminal Code sections 90 and 95]. You must
have an ATC to carry a loaded, concealed handgun.Some years ago, the SCC looked at a similar law - the
abortion law. In that case, the equivalent of an ATC was a
TAC - a Therapeutic Abortion Certificate. You could not
have or do an abortion unless you had a TAC.Dr. Morgentaler was charged with doing an abortion without
having a TAC. He was found innocent, and the law was struck
down, because the TAC was "illusory, or so difficult to
obtain as to be practically illusory." According to the
SCC, if the law OFFERED "a specially-tailored defence to a
particular charge," then that defence HAD TO BE AVAILABLE.
It could not be "illusory, or so difficult to obtain as to
be practically illusory" - or the court would have to find
the accused innocent, and strike the law down.SCC decisions set precedents that are binding on every court
in Canada. If an individual is arrested for carrying a
loaded, concealed firearm without the necessary ATC, the
accused can prove that the ATC is "illusory." In this
article, the police spokepersons have gone a long way toward
proving the case for the accused. The rest of the proof can
be brought out in court. The defence lawyer just asks the
people responsible for issuing ATCs to ordinary citizens who
are at risk just how many they have issued since 01 Dec
1998.The answer is zero, which apparently makes the case for the
defence. The accused must be found innocent, and the law
itself must be struck down. The SCC says so.NFA Newswire is a free service offered by the National
Firearms Association.For more information on the issues covered here, or on other
firearm related information, please contact the National
Firearms Association at (780) 439-1394 or visit our website.
Also, from the NFA's October Presidents Message, Jim Hinter says:
"In the courts, we are seeing many positive rulings. In Ontario, the Provincial Supreme Court has ruled that the inspection powers under the Firearms Act are unconstitutional. We confidently expect that, with the NFA's help, much of the firearms control law will be altered by the courts.We have also prepared a Constitutional Defense for persons who are charged with being in possession of firearms without a license. We have found what we believe is an iron-clad set of Supreme Court precedents that provide a solid defense for an accused person in this area.
We have had the first indications of how effective that defense can be. A young man in Ontario was charged, this August, with being in possession of a firearm without a license.
When the Crown was shown the NFA's defence information and told that it would be used, the Crown withdrew the charges."
This is page, definitely has some of the 'best' news we've heard in quite a while.. This ridiculous piece
of legislation is crumbling bit by bit...