Rules & Regulations
TRADING PROSPECTS
         One of the acceptable strategic moves in a losing year could be to dump a high priced, big name player for an up and coming prospect or prospects.  The issue with this is that Prospects have no MLB stats which the Trading Tool uses to evaluate.  And so, by default in a trade for prospects, all managers will be needed to approve the trade.  Of course, managers competing for the top yearly prize will surely stop any trades that will improve another competing team for this year.  To combat this, only the four managers farthest away in the standings will be asked to approve the trade.  To figure out who is "farthest away" simply multiply the number of slots that the manager is from the other two managers in the standings.  For example:

Say, in a 10 team league, the 9th place team trades Albert Pujols away for two prospects on the 2nd place team.  The managers that will be allowed to approve or deny the trade  are the 7th, 6th, 5th and 4th place managers.  Here's why:

Red and Bold are the two managers who have traded with each other.  Count number of slots the 1st place team is from the 2nd and 9th place team.  He is one slot away from the 2nd and eight slots away from the 9th.  You can see, this and all of the other managers below:

        1st      
2nd       3rd        4th        5th        6th       7th        8th        9th       10th
          1           -            1           2           3          4          5          6           -             8
  x     8           -            6           5           4          3          2          1           -             1
          8           -            6        
10         12         12        10         6           -             8

As you can see, when the number of slots away are multiplied together the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th managers have the highest numbers.  Therefore, they are the managers who are allowed to approve or deny the trade.  Take a different example:

       1st        2nd        3rd        4th      
5th       6th       7th        8th        9th        10th
          4          3           2           1           -            -          2          3            4           5
  x     5          4           3           2           -            -          1          2            3           4
      
20         12        6           2           -            -          2          6            12         20

In this example, the 1st, 2nd, 9th, and 10th managers are farthest away from the trade and therefore are allowed to approve or deny the trade.  But both of these examples come up with four managers.  There are some examples where there ends up being a tie for the highest products.  For example:

       1st        2nd      
3rd       4th        5th        6th       7th       8th       9th        10th
         2          1            -           1           2           3         4            -           6            7
  x    7          6            -           4           3           2          1           -           1            2
       
14         6           -           4          6           6         4           -           6            14

In this example, 1st place and 10th place are farthest away, but then 2nd, 5th, 6th, and 9th are all equally spaced away from the trade leaving six managers with approval rights.  In this case or any case where more than four managers qualify, the managers that will count be will be ones that are lower in the standings.  So, in this case, the four managers that would have approval or denial rights would be 1st, 10th, 9th, and 6th place.

Once exception to this rule is during the spring training of the first season.  Since there are no standings of any kind, there is no way to figure out which managers will accept or deny using this method.  Therefore, what will be done instead is that the waiver order that is created after the draft will determine a persons "slot" or rank.  Therefore, the person with the first waiver priority will act the same way that the first place person would, etc, etc.
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1