| All Others (7) |
| (0) |
| (0) |
| Blake Jim (2) |
 |
 |
 |
| Vote to modify the Trading Tool so that the Tool measures a Player's value per games played rather than per possible games. |
| STATED ISSUE: |
| FINAL RULING: |
| The League votes IN FAVOR of the modification. |
| VOTING TALLY: |
| "Yes" = a vote in favor of the proposal |
| "No" = a vote not in favor of the proposal |
| "Impartial" = a voiced indecision on the proposal (Uncounted towards final percentage of votes entered) |
| "No Vote" = an unvoiced indecision on the proposal (Uncounted towards final percentage of votes entered) |
| YES: |
| NO: |
| IMPARTIAL: |
| NO VOTE: |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Percentage to Overturn = 100% (2/2) |
| ISSUE RAISED BY: |
| BLAKE |
| INITIAL POST: |
| Calling Two Votes Apr 30 10:25pm I would like to fix and error on the design of the Trading Tool: Currently the trading tool considers a players value based on Total Possible Games Played. I'd like instead to measure a players value on the terms of Total Games played. |
| POSTS ARGUING IN FAVOR: |
| Blake |
| Blake |
| Calling Two Votes Apr 30 10:25pm Currently, by measuring a players worth based on Total POSSIBLE games played, the Trading Tool takes into account injury-history, but it has a negative effect of 1st and 2nd year players. It doesn't truly reflect their contributions to the league in their limited time. Therefore, Ryan Howard, Ryan Zimmerman, and Francisco Liriano have been undervalued because of their limited play. I believe a better reflection of their value is based on what they have done in the Games they have played, since this is really how managers view their value anyway. I believe in the future, this may deter greater trade problems later in the year when young players are traded for experienced players. (NOTE: I really did not explain this well, I wish to make a special plea to trust that this correction is for the better of the league) |