| All Others (7) |
| (0) |
| (0) |
| Jim Blake (2) |
 |
 |
 |
| Vote to modify the rule where Full Pay players are treated as Time-Served when traded. New Rule will hold the Manager Trading the Full Pay Player away to pay for his salary as a Full Pay player. |
| STATED ISSUE: |
| FINAL RULING: |
| The League rules IN FAVOR. |
| VOTING TALLY: |
| "Yes" = a vote in favor of the proposal |
| "No" = a vote not in favor of the proposal |
| "Impartial" = a voiced indecision on the proposal (Uncounted towards final percentage of votes entered) |
| "No Vote" = an unvoiced indecision on the proposal (Uncounted towards final percentage of votes entered) |
| YES: |
| NO: |
| IMPARTIAL: |
| NO VOTE: |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Percentage to Overturn = 100% (2/2) |
| ISSUE RAISED BY: |
| JIM |
| INITIAL POST: |
| Formal Proposal
by: jpcollins22 (Team AARP) May 31 3:18pm This is a proposal regarding full pay players and their effect on team salary. As it stands now, if/when a full pay player is traded from Team A to Team B, he is regarded as a time-served player for both teams. WHAT I AM PROPOSING: If you have a full pay player on your team (say Aaron Hill), and you realize he sucks and you wish to trade him, he will still be regarded as a full pay player on your final salary tally. Disclosure: realizing someone sucks has nothing to do with this proposal. any full pay player, good or bad, that is traded, is regarded as a full pay player for the team that dealt him, but as a time served player for the team recieving him. |
| Jim |