| Amblyopia | ||
Richard W. Hertle
| Database Differential Diagnosis Data Gathering Physical Examination Laboratory Aids Therapy Follow-Up Common Questions and Answers Bibliography |
| DATABASE | ||
DEFINITION
From “amblyos” meaning “dullness of vision” (lazy eye)
A neuropathologic process unique to infancy and childhood resulting in decreased vision in one or both eyes; initiated by any condition resulting in abnormal or unequal visual input between birth and about 9 years of age.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
CLASSIFICATION
There are three major types of amblyopia that reflect a common interruption in visual development.
PATHOLOGY
The lateral geniculate body layers serving the amblyopic eye(s) are atrophic. The visual cortex serving the amblyopic eye(s) is atrophic, less organized, and synaptically aberrant.
GENETICS
There is no hereditary predisposition to primary amblyopia, as this is an acquired disease. There is an increased prevalence in family members due to similar amblyogenic conditions strabismus, which can cause strabismus secondarily.
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Amblyopia is present in 2% of the population and is the leading cause of preventable visual loss in children. Strabismic amblyopia is the most common (occurring in 50% of patients with strabismus), followed by ametropic (mostly anisometropia), and image degradation (lenticular and corneal disease are most common).
COMPLICATIONS
Untreated amblyopia results in irreversable visual loss with an increased risk of complete visual disability if the good eye is traumatized or affected by disease.
PROGNOSIS
Final visual acutity is dependent on the combination of amblyogenic factor, age at presentation, and compliance with amblyopia treatment. In general, the earlier the diagnosis and treatment the better the prognosis.
| DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS | ||
| DATA GATHERING | ||
HISTORY
Question: How, when, and where was visual loss first
noticed?
Significance: Age of onset and duration of vision loss is
crucial in reversibility of amblyopia.
Question: How has this changed?
Significance: Worsening
acuity may imply an organic component to the amblyopic vision loss.
Question: Other ocular abnormalities noted or
treated?
Significance: These may contribute to the etiology of the
amblyopic vision loss.
Question: Familial ocular history?
Significance: There are
forms of amblyopia with higher prevalence in families.
Question: The presence of any trauma, prenatal, perinatal, or
postnatal medical or surgical problems?
Significance: These questions
will aid with determining the etiology of the amblyopia.
Question: Current and past medications and known
allergies?
Significance: These routine questions may be important in
the medical management of the strabismus, e.g., use of certain topical eye
drops.
Question: Exposures to toxins or new climates/travel/day care, or
recent systemic illness?
Significance: These historical questions also
aid in determining organic causes of vision loss in addition to amblyopia, e.g.,
toxoplasmosis.
| PHYSICAL EXAMINATION | ||
Finding: Accurate monocular and binocular visual acuities are the most
sensitive indicators of amblyopia. Snellen (letter), Allen (picture), or HOTV
charts are the most accurate testing methods.
Significance: The
ultimate diagnosis of amblyopia is determined by an accurate measurement of
visual acuity.
Finding: Other important diagnostic signs are the presence of head
posture, strabismus, nystagmus, abnormal pupillary responses, photophobia, and
absent or asymmetric red fundus reflexes.
Significance: All of these
physical signs can help with differentiating organic vision loss from
amblyopia.
Finding: A general developmental and neurological
examination
Significance: Helps rule out obvious central nervous
system pathology.
| LABORATORY AIDS | ||
Test: Hematologic
Significance: There are no hematologic
tests or blood chemistries that will help with diagnosis. These are ordered as
indicated by the diagnosed amblyogenic stimulus (e.g., uveitisblood
analysis).
Test: Radiologic
Significance: No imaging is helpful for
diagnosis, but may be used to define associated condition (trauma, developmental
or acquired orbital and lid abnormalities).
Test: Electrophysiologic
Significance: Visual evoked
responses and electroretinography (see Strabismus
chapter) are useful to diagnose and characterize any associated organic disease
of the afferent visual system (retinal degeneration, optic nerve dysplasia,
anoxic encephalopathy). The presence of both amblyopia and organic disease
affects the prognosis of visual recovery from amblyopia treatment.
| THERAPY | ||
| FOLLOW-UP | ||
PREVENTION
PITFALLS
Testing visual acuity in children is often inconsistent. Reliable and repeatable methods must be used to test vison in the office setting.
| COMMON QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS | ||
Q: What will be the final vision of an amblyopic eye?
A: The
greater the structural or visual difference between the two eyes the less the
chance of achieving normal vision. Obtaining 20/200 vision from counting fingers
vision with treatment gives the patient a functional eye.
Q: Will the eye see normal after successful treatment?
A: An
amblyopic eye which is 20/20 after treatment remains subjectively different from
the normal eye to the patient for his or her lifetime.
ICD-9-CM 368.0
| BIBLIOGRAPHY | ||
Ching FC, Parks NMN, Friendly DS. Practical management of amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strab 1986;23:12–17.
Hubel DH. Deprivation and development. In: Hubel DH, ed. Eye, brain, and vision. New York: WH Freeman, 1989:191–218.
Vaegan K, Taylor TD. Critical period for deprivation amblyopia in children. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc UK 1979;99:432–455.
Verecken EP, Brabant P. Prognosis for vision in amblyopia after loss of the good eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:220–227.
von Norden GK. Mechanisms of amblyopia. Adv Ophthalmol 1977;34:93–110.
Copyright
© 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
M. William
Schwartz, Louis M. Bell, Jr., Peter M. Bingham, Esther K. Chung, David F.
Friedman and Andrew E. Mulberg, The 5 Minute Pediatric Consult