Videotape Lesson Reflection
&
Classroom Teacher Observation Form
Denise Thrasher
Indiana Wesleyan University
May 28, 2003
Mr. Gianfermi and I met on May 6, 2003 in order to review the videotape lesson that he would be observing. At that time, we discussed the three teaching models that were to be used: The Inductive Model, The Lecture-Discussion Model and The Direct Instruction Model. Further, the goals and the potential student outcomes of the lesson were discussed in addition to the ways in which this lesson and the UAP fit together. Finally, a time was set for the observation.
The observation took place on May 8, 2003 and the post-observation meeting took place on May 19, 2003. As part of the post-observation conference, it was determined that the lesson's objectives focused on student learning outcomes, the lesson was motivational, well-structured and engaged students in the learning process. Accommodations for diverse learners were discussed in addition to the actual steps of the lesson plan. The observation notes made following the completion of the lesson and student projects were also reviewed.
The lesson reached the desired goals, however one student was slightly intimidated by the presence of the camera and some points of the lesson were discussed with that student after the camera was turned off. Additionally, one student was absent and a follow-up discussion took place with her.
The step by step preparation for the lesson including the conferences with Mr. Gianfermi and the reflection on the process as a whole were very helpful. After teaching for a few years, it becomes all too easy to go into automatic mode. It was good to slow down and actually review what took place and to look for ways to improve student learning.
CLASSROOM TEACHING OBSERVATION
Candidate Name Denise L. Thrasher
Observer Name & Position Mark Gianfermi, Principal
|
Date of Pre-Conference |
May 6, 2003 |
|
Date of Teaching Observation |
May 8, 2003 |
|
Date of Post-Conference |
May 19, 2003 |
Scoring Guide for Classroom Teaching Observation Process (25)
|
Process Criteria |
Points Possible |
Points Earned |
|
Candidate and observer met prior to the teaching time to discuss the alignment of lesson plan objectives with the selected teaching model |
5 |
5 |
|
Candidate taught a lesson lasting 20-30 minutes while the observer completed the scoring guide for the actual teaching demonstration |
10 |
10 |
|
Candidate and observer assessed student outcomes of the lesson during a post-observation conference |
10 |
10 |
Scoring Guide for the Actual Classroom Teaching Observation (75)
|
Teaching Criteria |
Points Possible |
Points Earned |
|
Lesson objectives focused on student learning outcomes |
20 |
20 |
|
Lesson activities are motivational, well-structured and engaging |
10 |
10 |
|
Accommodations for diverse learner needs are consistently present |
10 |
10 |
|
Resources and procedures are clearly aligned with lesson objectives |
10 |
10 |
|
Lesson has a clear beginning and an appropriate conclusion |
5 |
10 |
|
Assessment of student learning is clearly evident and appropriate |
10 |
10 |
|
Selected teaching model is clearly demonstrated during the lesson |
10 |
10 |
Areas of strength:
Mrs. Thrasher is very aware of state and national standards and addresses them on a continual basis. Mrs. Thrasher's lessons are motivating to the learners in her class. She challenges her students to discover answers through problem based lessons. She is proficient at using technology in her lessons as well as engaging her students in multi-strategy projects. Mrs. Thrasher uses a variety of assessment techniques including teacher observation, journal writing and projects. She also uses many group or collaborative projects in which student learn how to work with each other. Students are aware of expectations and are provided copies of rubrics and standards.
Areas for improvement:
Summary Comments:
Mrs. Thrasher developed a well thought out lesson for her French students. She is very conscientious to address standards in her lessons and students knew her expectations up front. Mrs. Thrasher incorporated current technology into her lesson and used to keep students focused and involved.
(A copy of the signed version was
being mailed with tape) (Observer Signature)