Microevolution is well established, but macroevolution is fiction
There's no clear distinction between micro- and macroevolution. If this is intended to exclude common ancestry of humans and great apes it will certainly not. DNA sequence similarity is clear evidence of common ancestry. The nature of the differences is far stronger evidence.
The Bible is more reliable than science
The Bible is written language which is inherently ambiguous. "Correct interpretation" is oxymoron.
If evolution is true scientists should be able to demonstrate it in the laboratory
Evolution (like geology) is a complex, time dependent process. The best we can do is test its predictions.