Webquest
Group Project
Lisa ChebyEfficiency
Expert |
Kathy GayerAffiliator |
Sam KoskelaAltitudinist |
Raphael
Lieberman Technophile |
Our Group impressions, based on analysis of the websites, ranked
in preference :
Best Sites: Gallery of Artifacts, The Gilded Age
Worst Sites: Who Wants to Be a Millionaire, Conflict Yellowstone Wolves
The following comments from group members indicate reasons for website ranking:
|
WebQuest |
Strengths |
Weaknesses |
|
Who Wants to be a Millionaire? |
-
Lots of hands on applications and high level
computation skill required; -
Requires managing different worksheets; -
Requires group work for research, collaboration,
findings; -
Navigation points throughout; -
Clear objectives; -
Good tasks, well-defined for relevant field
(e.g., economics).
|
-
Outside resources might be unrealistic
expectation for student; -
Not visually or technologically stimulating; -
Worksheets 1 & 2 require solo work for
calculations; -
Calculating requires solo work, also worksheets; -
Multiple links to same worksheet; - 15-20 min. presentation seems long; - Busy backgrounds; too much text. |
|
Gallery of Art-i-Facts |
-
Very dynamic, interesting; -
Excellent use of glossary and resources to enrich
learning; -
Good, clean layout; navigation is well
thought-out; -
Enables teamwork for sharing information,
presentation and rubric; -
Includes valuable elements of social art history
and understanding |
-
May need more links so students don’t miss
segments; -
Might overwhelm students with complexity of
resources; -
Roles are assigned, rather than chosen, may be
frustrating; -
May be too complex for some students; |
|
Conflict Yellowstone Wolves |
-
Clear instructions; involves group work; -
Image-oriented, interactive; -
Includes group-work for editorial, joint
decision-making; -
Clear instructions. |
-
Many links are dead or unavailable; -
Subject matter could be inaccessible for
inner-city youth; -
Workload may not be equal for all members; -
Top-mounted menu hinders navigation. |
|
The Gilded Age |
-
Requires high level of technological skill and
analysis; requires PowerPoint presentation; -
by requiring construction of a power point
presentation; -
Guided group roles effectively break up
responsibility; -
Group work creates documentary; -
Collaboration enhances communication skills; Plethora
of interesting resources Overall
a fascinating part of American history with lots of resources and thought
provoking questions posed, but… |
-
Technological requirements may be beyond students
without a great deal of preparation; -
Too many steps, too many resources, too
complicated; -
Most work done by lead historian; -
Many technical skills needed for documentary. |
|
Extra, Extra! |
-
Exceptionally interesting role-playing concepts; -
Exciting, interesting resources; -
Clear, specific roles; -
Group decides on positions, presentation;
encourages sharing. |
-
May create different workloads; -
Evaluation sheet is a little unclear compared to
rest of materials; -
Concept of role playing may be above students’
heads; -
Graphics and layout a little off-putting; -
Bottom-mounted menu is cumbersome. |
Bernie Dodge, Department of Educational Technology, SDSU