FOR THOSE WHO KEEP WONDERING IF THERE ARE ANY IRS AGENTS OUT THERE WHO ARE HONEST AND HAVE A CONSCIENCE ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON IN THIS WORLD, AND WILL TRY TO DO WHAT'S RIGHT.
ONE OF OUR LAWSUIT MEMBERS, FRANK PADDOCK OF INDIANA, HAD BEEN DEALING WITH THE IRS FOR SOME TIME, TELLING THE AGENT THAT HE, MR. PADDOCK, DID NOT OWE THE INCOME TAX CLAIMED.
NOT VERY LONG AGO, IN RESPONSE TO MR. PADDOCK'S POSITION, THE AGENT WENT IN AND TOOK FROM HIS, PADDOCK'S, 401K ACCOUNT, $29,000., AFTER WHICH MR. PADDOCK RESPONDED BY SENDING THE AGENT A COPY OF THE EVIDENCE PACKAGE AND SLIDE VIDEO.
A SHORT TIME LATER, MR. PADDOCK RECEIVED A LETTER BACK FROM THE AGENT ADVISING HIM THAT THEY, THE IRS FEDERAL AGENCY, WERE GOING TO RETURN TO HIM $19,000. OF THAT WHICH HAS JUST BEEN TAKEN.
OF COURSE, IT SHOULD BE NOTED HERE, THAT THE REASON THAT THEY WOULD NOT SIMPLY REFUND THE WHOLE AMOUNT IS THAT IT WOULD BE A DEAD GIVE AWAY AS TO THEIR SUDDEN REALIZATION THAT SOMETHING WAS ACTUALLY WRONG, AND THAT THE ULTIMATE LAWSUIT MATERIALS PROVED IT.
SO, MR. PADDOCK STARTED RECEIVING CHECKS FROM THE IRS VIA THE AGENT, BUT MR. PADDOCK DID NOT RECEIVE BACK THE $19,000. AS PROMISED. NO. WHAT MR. PADDOCK DID RECEIVE IS SHOWN BELOW, THE LAST TWO ARRIVING AT HIS HOME ON MONDAY, MAY 13, 2002, AND THE ONE PREVIOUS TO THOSE TO ARRIVING ON FRIDAY, MAY 10, 2002, ALL FOR A TOTAL OF $21,914.44!
TO PROVIDE YOU WITH PROOF OF THESE CHECKS REALITY, MR. PADDOCK FAXED A COPY OF EACH FOR OUR MEMBERS TO SEE FOR THEMSELVES. PLEASE NOTE THAT EACH CHECK ALSO REFERS TO A CERTAIN AMOUNT THEREOF AS BEING "INTEREST." MR. PADDOCK'S ADDRESS & ZIP CODE HAVE BEEN BLOTTED IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT FROM THE GUILTY.
THE AMOUNTS FOR THE CHECKS - SHOWN ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE, ARE AS FOLLOWS:
| $1,484.10 |
| $3,367.74 |
| $4,517.09 |
| $3,831.01 |
| $3,828.08 |
| $67.57 |
| $75.42 |
| $4,743.43 |
| TOTAL: $21,914.44 |
WELL OVER the $19,000. originally promised! Wonder why the IRS agent did that? Reckon it was because Mr. Paddock was so nice to him? .. Or was it maybe because this particular agent saw something that others will eventually see, and this agent happened to be honest and conscionable (applause for this agent) for a change? To see the pictures of the checks themselves, CLICK HERE.