AND GOD SAID

THE TRUTH ABOUT THE IRS AND THE VOW OF POVERTY

Some people have asked to have it explained in greater detail just exactly how the code as set forth in IRS publications 515, 525 and 2105 establish that the IRS, and its supporting Congress, has called all ministers, sages, prophets, Buddhas, etc. and their congregations or followers "Ungodly" or "Unholy." To answer these inquiries as accurately as possible, there have been provided the below illustrations to shed greater light on this matter, so that all who wish to know and understand the truth as it really is may do so and not be swayed by every whim of legal or political doctrine that blows in with the winds of the hollow opinions of ignorant men.

The statement indicating that all ministers, etc. that are not Catholic are ungodly is made constructively by the IRS, not in specific language, but that does not matter if the effect and the outcome are the same. Note. Those who work for a religious order, having taken a vow of poverty (a Historical Roman Catholic Church Religious Doctrine) are regarded as working under one kind or area of the law, and all other ministers are regarded as working under another kind or area of the law. Two different kinds of law to define the ministries of two different kinds or categories of religions?? One might ask, how can that be? There is supposed to be NO distinguishment of churches or religions under the law. The flat out truth is that to place one church under one kind or area of the law, while placing all other churches or religions totally under another kind or area of the law is "pure" discrimination, no matter how you spell it, although in reality there is nothing "pure" about discrimination, particularly prejudicial discrimination.

As you will see by careful examination of certain paragraphs and passages contained in publications 517, ALL ministers, except for Catholic Priest and Nuns, are considered as being employed by their respective church congregations under the common law (NOT under "God's Law"). No connection to God there, just to the people of the congregation who are looked at as being the one (not due to any act, influence, or existence of God in their lives) who employs that minister. But the "common law" is supposed to be how the law evolved among the people, going back hundreds of years, not how the IRS decided the common law was to be in this modern age. SO, because these ministers (not Catholic) work for the congregation (not for God via a religious order by taking a Vow of Poverty), they (such ministers) are taxable. Again, NO doctrine of these other churches have been recognized to indicate that these (non Catholic) ministers work for anyone but the congregations, just as the common, also not working for God, people, nothing to do with a concept of religion that might have some sanctity to be respected.

Catholic Priests and Nuns, however, do NOT (according to the IRS) work for their congregations under the common law the way that all other ministers do. NO! They work under the "law of agency," or are recognized by the IRS as agents for the (religious) order. What is an order? Since when did Congress have the power to recognize the Catholic Church and any claim thereof as being, in whole or in part, a religious order, and as not being a church for First Amendment purposes? . . . . so that recognizing the Catholic Church as an "order," based particularly upon its embracing the "Vow Of Poverty" (a long-established Roman Catholic Church Religious Doctrine which holds that the person vowing it has nothing for himself/herself but ALL that he/she has belongs to and goes to God, and anything received to sustain same {he/she} comes from that same God as payment in kind for HIS services) must logically hold its employment allegiance as being to that one God, from whom all of his/her sustenance flows, none of its ministers, priests or nuns, having nothing for themselves?

Bear in mind that the recognition of the Vow Of Poverty, a definite, historical, Roman Catholic Church religious DOCTRINE, has been incorporated into the Code according to IRS publications 517 and 525, YET at the same time that same Vow Of Poverty provision is NOT recognized in the Code for any tax advantage purposes according to IRS publication 2105, which IRS publication 2105 indicates that persons (not Roman Catholic Priests and Nuns) in general may be prosecuted criminally for using a Vow Of Poverty to avoid their [religious] "responsibility" to pay taxes on income received. Bear also in mind that anyone may create and ordain a[n] (religious) order for themselves under the rights granted by the First Amendment, YET according to the TIP we see in the 2001 edition of IRS publication 517, page 4, right column, the ministers of that (religious) order are ALREADY being recognized BECAUSE of the Vow Of Poverty (ie, "all that I have belongs/goes to God" {yet I must sustain myself somehow, so I must be working for God to that extent at least}) to such an extent that they do NOT even have to request to have their ministry and status granted an exemption because they (this religious order that is known so well by the IRS that they don’t even have to be named) already ARE - Exempt - IN ADVANCE!

However, there are other known orders , not Catholic, who have also taken a Vow Of Poverty, yet THEY must still petition the IRS for their own recognition in order to be granted that same exempt status. What is the difference?

The Catholic Church-Order, not any other church OR order, works under the law of AGENCY, or as AGENTS. . . . . And who would it be believed that they are AGENTS for? The Vow Of Poverty tells us that; NOTHING that they (the Catholic Church's priest or nuns) receive from mankind in the way of value stays with them under THAT (value) condition, under the Vow Of Poverty, but GOES to GOD, and anything they (priests and nuns) receive in order to be sustained, which they would have to receive from the ONE who employs them, since they do work performing sacerdotal (priestly) services, MUST COME FROM GOD, the ONE who has everything, even (or especially) those goods or that money which they momentarily had in their possession to begin with.

Since the Catholic Priest and Nun thus, as "agents" for God, through the religious order, under the auspices (influence) of the Vow Of Poverty must, by this discernment, work for God, they (Catholic Priests and Nuns) MUST be a Godly ministry. So constructively says the IRS.

On the other hand, those ministers who do NOT work for God, not being HIS agents through a (religious) order, under ANY principle or DOCTRINE Equally Recognized by the IRS, must be UNGODLY, that is, their ministry does not work for God but for man, and man is SINFUL, or UNGODLY, and must be taxed as any other heathen. So constructively says the IRS.

No, they (the IRS) are not so lacking of cunning as to openly, in so many direct words, say "all ministries but one are ungodly," but when you boil down the differences as to who they, the IRS, indicates, that each type of minister works for, and who certain ones do NOT work for, and further, when you discover that ministers, whether or not self proclaimed, who take a Vow Of Poverty but are not "members of a Religious Order," or are not Catholic Members of a Religious Order, CAN BE SENT TO PRISON for taking said Vow Of Poverty while proclaiming themselves as ministers and trying to take advantage of the same tax advantages as are available to said "members of a Religious Order who have taken a Vow Of Poverty, then it becomes very clear that the IRS has determined, in and by the Code itself as well as by their practices and acts, that certain ministers found in only one church or religion work for God and therefore must be Godly, and all other ministers do NOT work for God and are therefore UNgodly. They, the UNgodly ministers, and ALL of their congregations with them!

You will find references to issues of regular ministers working for the church congregation under the common law on pages 3 and 11 of IRS publication 517, and you will find the issues of agency and the vow of poverty on pages 3, 4, 6, and 8 ("receives pay for services performed as an agent"), and also found in IRS publication 525 on page 11. And as to the potential for Imprisonment for not being Catholic if taking a Vow Of Poverty at a time at the time of not being Catholic, on page 2 of IRS publication 2105, you will discover that the IRS says that "Taking a Vow Of Poverty is NOT legal!" This publication has its mainstay for areas of IRS publication found in the CI division (Criminal Investigations Division) of the IRS, and the IRS only recently made that publication available through its other access link at its web site in order to cover up this discovery made by the Ultimate 2001 lawsuit.

The cover up now does them no good, as the whole matter has been discovered, and there is no denying that, just by reading the other subject matter material contained on page 2 of IRS publication 2105, the concept of "taking a Vow Of Poverty" "NOT" [being] "legal" is a criminal matter as far as the IRS federal agency is concerned, and not civil.

The VOW OF POVERTY as a Legal Religious Exemption EXPOSED

Every human person on the face of the earth has to eat. That is an irrefutable fact. A fact strong enough and real enough to make a critical examination of the truth, the Real Truth, not the one that the IRS would like to propose...

In reality, we know that the idea that the Priests actually work for God as a legal matter (especially holding that nobody else legally does) is a complete civil SHAM. Look at it this way. Let's say that the Priest receives a bag of groceries, which has a value of say $100. In accordance to the directives or suggestions found on page 11 of IRS publication 525, he immediately renounces the bag of food and its value and gives it to the Order under the Vow Of Poverty, meaning that it is now all going to and belongs to God. So that God can get the food before it spoils, he places it in the Church's/order's cathedral kitchen refrigerator. Some of the food that is in the bag would be known by most people to be delicious and nutritious. But since it all belongs to God, he, the priest, puts all of the food in the cathedral refrigerator.

Several hours later he grows hungry. Remembering the food that is in the refrigerator, and knowing that it belongs to God, not to himself, he cannot touch it without God's permission. So, he goes into the chapel and kneels down and prays for God to give him food to sustain his life. God speaks to him immediately in his heart, since the priest has been working for God by his total, non-self serving dedication, gathering together things of every kind to give to HIM, God (as evidenced by the "all that I have and ever shall receive and have belongs to God" Vow of Poverty doctrine), and so (God) tells him, the hungry priest, that . . . "by the way, there is some food in the cathedral's refrigerator," and to "just go and help yourself," which he, the priest, straightaway does.

He eats heartily all that God has "given" him, yet such food, not having any earthly value, is not "income" (according to the IRS) from any manmade source, because he, the priest, did not really, ultimately need the food anyway (the food eating was all just to keep up appearances for some reason not needing to be explained to anyone), because God would actually have sustained his life without it. Okay, now who had that bridge in Brooklyn for sale?

Oftentimes the priest's working for the Order is officially recognized by his being established, either directly or indirectly, under a corporation sole, a special, uncommon kind of corporation also created by the Catholic Church for its own purposes in about 800 A.D. It is known that by being incorporated as a corporation sole (sole meaning one) while taking a Vow of Poverty, the Roman Catholic Priest can go from the cathedral to the golf course in a brand new stretch limousine (no earthly value either), but it is of no avail for tax purposes, because the limousine does not belong to the priest but to God; another answer to the priest's prayers no doubt. This of course raises the concern as to whether God rides in the back seat with the priest and wears a seat belt as required by law in some States or does He, God, actually drive the limousine for the priest, which if He does, the legal question must arise, does God have a[ny] state drivers license, or should He be expected to obtain one.

This may seem to be a bit humorous at first, but it is in fact very serious since this is the kind of legal conclusive thinking that must exist in the heads of both IRS officials and Congress persons who have voted to sustain the IRS' right to impose current Title 26 tax laws containing such religious based philosophies and doctrines upon the various ministers, congregations, and people, both upon the Catholics and the Protestants (already known as being centuries old rivals) as well as the Jews, the Muslims, the Buddhists, all other religions, even atheists, agnostics, etc. Such thinking and doctrine ought not to be even remotely available in the tax laws of the United States.

Back to the groceries and the delicious food that the priest has just enjoyed, courtesy of "God." If that kind of practice exhibited by the groceries and the refrigerator scenario were to take place in a regular corporation not a corporation sole, or in just a common everyday example of life with regular persons who had not taken a Vow Of Poverty, the government, including/especially the IRS and its self-righteous prosecutors, would immediately treat those actions as being a SHAM and a FRAUD, and would prosecute the person acting in such a manner without a question or doubt.

This is not a joke, nothing to be sneered at, treated with derision, and is definitely NOT FRIVOLOUS.

The First Amendment is clear in that it prohibits the government, of which the IRS has become and is an extension of, from distinguishing or respecting between one church and another, YET this is precisely what they (the government and the IRS) have done where they have placed one church's ministers under one division of law, making them untaxable from the beginning, while they (the government and the IRS) have placed ALL other churches' ministers under another division of the law where they can be taxed, unless granted privilege of exemption, NOT given up front without the asking for it, all done by use of the incorporation of that one church's long established religious DOCTRINE INTO the United States Tax Code!!!

THIS IS AN OUTRAGE, and this is Tyranny at its worst, and NO judge or other official owes any allegiance to any government agency or function who would be so-used to employ this kind of gross violation of the human spirit and freedom of conscience and personal belief in religion in utter, obvious and oblivious violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution whose purpose it was, and is, to protect the people, every one of us, from this very monstrous thing.

It took great legal skill to strip away the mask which hid the terrible monster behind the murder crimes in the case of Charles Manson. The prosecutor had to constructively create the means, the motive, and the manner (not easily seeable to the casual observer) in which Charles Manson carried out his heinous acts. It is fitting to constructively reveal the things that the IRS has said in its code to the people. The code has now been decoded. The ugly monster has been exposed, ugly bigoted head and all. So says the people.

And so, there can be no doubt that incorporating the Vow Of Poverty into the Title 26 Tax Code is the most serious Constitutional Insult, Contempt, and First Amendment Violation that the people of the United States have ever been exposed to – to date. Nor can there be any forgiveness for it, . . . sorry, no forgiveness for it at all, for the First Amendment was sufficient warning, in writing, as to what they were NOT to do, but which they did do. The First Amendment was never a "suggestion;" as a matter of law, it was and is, at all times, an ORDER, exceeding all other non-constitutional orders (ie, laws, rules, regulations, policies) of and for the United States, or either of them.