Hosted by www.Geocities.ws



Perfect: (1) complete in all respects; without defect or omission; sound; flawless; (2) in a condition of complete excellence as in skill or quality; faultless; most excellent, sometimes used comparatively ("a more perfect union"); (3) completely accurate; exact; precise ("a perfect copy"); (4) without reserve or qualification; pure; utter, sheer; absolute ("a perfect fool," "perfect stranger"); (5) designating a binding of books in which pages are glued to cloth or paper at the spine rather than having the signatures sewed together; (6) Botany: same as MONOCLINOUS; (7) to bring to completion; (8) to make perfect or more nearly perfect according to a given standard, as by training.

Perfectionism: any doctrine that holds that moral, religious, or social perfection can and should be attained in this life.

Perfection: (1) the act or process of perfecting; (2) the quality or condition of being perfect; (3) extreme degree of excellence according to a given standard; (4) a person or thing that is the perfect embodiment of some quality.

Therefore, it seems to me (the author) that by definition (and this is a contradiction in terms when you think about it), that perfection is entirely subjective; therefore, each one of us needs to decide for ourselves what perfection really is based on the facts, and then follow that ideal, and try to keep emotion and a desire for retaliation out of the picture as best we can.

The question we should be asking ourselves at this juncture is: whose definition of perfection are we going to follow--one that can never be achieved in this life, or one than can? If we choose either to follow the concept that true perfection can never be achieved in this life, then why bother? No one knows for sure what is waiting on the other side. Why not just give up? If only God is perfect, and we are all sinners, what's the use? Oh! The Afterlife! I forgot.

I have said time and time again that there is no way that I am getting into Heaven. Why? Because of the place that the Church calls Heaven. I know I can never live up to what it would take to be able to enter such a place, with St. Peter in front of the pearly gates (it would probably sound like a bad joke anyway, since I was born a Jew). I can never earn my right to exist for all eternity in such a pristine atmosphere. In order for that to happen, I would literally have to become a legend in my own time (as opposed to being a legend in my own mind, which, of course, I am, or I would not be writing this book). I would have to become Saint Mickilas (the name I use at Christmas, LOL!). I would have to be canonized within my own lifetime, which is impossible, because one can only become a saint after one is dead, and then a council of men have to vote on it.

So, then why am I not a satanist? Because I've always known that the God of organized religions is not real, not on every level. I cannot reject the God of the churches completely because some people still need that safety net. But instead of turning against God, I decided to do my own homework to find support and new information for who He really is.

My argument is this: I believe in the history of Jesus and the Blood Royal as I present it in this book. We all know that in no way could the real man live up to the myth, just by examining ourselves and the unreasonable expectations placed upon us by organized religion. Not only that, but given who Jesus really was, it was forbidden for him to be that mythological figure.

Yes, Jesus did say that he was both the Son of God and the Son of Man, but taken out of context, those two phrases mean something completely different than what he really meant.

Jesus was the Son of Man. No argument there. His mother, Mary, and his father, Joseph, were real flesh and blood people. Later, Jesus was called, and called himself, the Son of God for two, possibly three, reasons (and the third reason is my own belief). In one sense, Jesus called himself the Son of God in the same way that we are all children of God, but man didn't want to accept that truth, so Jesus was glorified beyond belief (at least for me). Jesus called himself the Son of God because there was an actual man who held the title of God in the Kingdom of Heaven (the Qumran Community), who was responsible for mentoring people like Jesus.

Therefore, Jesus was the spiritual son of whoever this man was. Again, the known world of that day turned a deaf ear, much preferring something mystical and magical to the reality. The third reason, a personal belief and conclusion that I came to based on my historical research, is that the entire Bible, starting with Adam and ending with Jesus, is all about the Messianic Bloodline and no one else, the God-appointed (God the Father) and anointed kingly line.

Knowing what we know about the coronation ceremonies since Jesus' day in other countries that support(ed) a monarchy, people who did and/or do not have to right to do this are now and were crowned in church. They usurped the God-appointed kingly right from the Davidic heirs, Jesus and James' descendants, because they wanted power and control. That's why the royal bloodline was hunted down for centuries after Jesus died. There are people now sitting on thrones with crowns on their heads who have no right to wear them, including and especially the Pope. The Catholic Church was the biggest persecutor of the Royal Blood, and probably still is.

Click here for Perfection, Part Two
HOME
1