Laurel A. Rockefeller | [email protected] | cell number: 908.720.7050 |
Laurel A. Rockefeller
Empress Wu and Poetry Too: Part Two:
Empress Wu and Meritocracy
By Laurel A. Rockefeller
In part one of Empress Wu and Poetry Too, I provided an overview
of the Tang Dynasty and its significance to modern history. Most
of Japanese history and culture was strongly shaped by the
accidental journeys of Japanese fisherman to the Chinese mainland
and the technologies and ideas they came back with. Japan turned
from matriarchy to patriarchy. In China, Buddhism had arrived and
distinctly Chinese versions of the faith emerged, including Pure
Land and Chan Buddhism. Emerging out of feudalism, China
rediscovered Confucianism and its harshly patriarchal
"glories" that took away most of women's rights. Foot
binding came into fashion along with gowns so revealing of the
breasts that even Renaissance Europeans would blush!
But the Tang Dynasty was also the period where two very strong
women would take center stage. General Hua Mulan was already
discussed in part one. Hua Mulan achieved her greatness by
concealing her femininity until after she retired. But concealing
her womanhood was not the road to power for Wu Zetian. She alone
would claim the title "Nu Huang," sovereign queen. Even
Empress Dowager Cixi of the late Qing dynasty never assumed a
title so lofty!
Wu Zetian began her infamous career as first a fifth concubine of
the Tai Zong emperor (Li Shimin) and later second concubine to
his son, the Gao Zong emperor (Li Zhi). As her willingness to
marry both father and son suggest, Wu was ambitious and unafraid
to seize power-by any means necessary
(http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Tang/tang.htm). Her story
is filled with murder, political intrigue, competent rulership,
and sexual seduction. Yet for all her tactics, they were not
uncommon for her time: her male counterparts routinely used both
violence and political maneuvering to gain power-especially in
the Tang dynasty. The sexual seduction part has likewise been a
tactic of most women rulers, especially those aiming for
sovereignty in an otherwise male dominated system. History is
filled with stories of women willing to use their charms and
sexuality to obtain power, status, and personal goals. But
Empress Wu was more than your typical ambitious seductress.
During her reign major cornerstones of Chinese government were
laid down that carry through to modern times, including a
tradition so dominant in the culture that thousands of Chinese
every year journey to the United States to fulfill.
What tradition could that be? Plain and simple: EDUCATION. Prior
to Empress Wu, there was an emphasis on education, but it
extended only to the wealthy who could easily afford to employ
tutors and teachers for their children. The poor and middle class
were excluded and largely not educated in a situation no
different than in most other corners of the world prior and
contemporary. But Wu Zetian, reigning from her city of Luoyang
(the same Luoyang as the love song you heard me sing at
coronation), changed all that. Prior to her reign, it was
lawfully forbidden for a man of lowly birth to take the requisite
civil service exams used for all government positions-from the
lowliest clerk or teacher to the highest official in court.
Without the exam, no one could serve in any government position.
In China, the way out of poverty was a government job, especially
as Confucianism took hold. Empress Wu changed the law to
guarantee that any man who wished to take the exams were admitted
and given the tests. This in turn led to the practice of lineage
associations (a type of organized extended clan group) taxing all
families with the proceeds going to scholarships sponsering poor
by highly talented clan members. Sponsership meant poor children
showing promise to do well on the exams would be given an equal
education as those of the wealthy. Given that wealth through
commerce was as discouraged in China as it was in Europe, this
reform was critical to creating social mobility.
In addition to reforming the examination system, Empress Wu began
a policy of personally interviewing candidates for high
government positions. No longer could a person bribe an official
into a higher official. Empress Wu herself decided if a candidate
possessed the right qualities for each upper level job. To that
end, she engaged in huge talent searches to find the best and
brightest of men for her government-regardless of social standing
or wealth. That idea of meritocracy has carried through the
centuries and has bolstered the Chinese impetus for the highest
possible education. With such limited space available in schools
in China today, many who aren't able to make the top grade come
to the United States in search of that all important college
degree. Thanks to Empress Wu, this Chinese emphasis on universal
education to the highest possible level became the cultural norm
and a tradition that no amount of social, economic, or political
upheaval could change. Even the 20th century reign of Mao Zedong
and the destruction of educational institutions during the Wenhua
Da Geming (Cultural Revolution) could only last a short time.
Empress Wu's educational reforms have proven the stronger legacy.
Beyond education, Empress Wu was an agrarian innovator,
commissioning the study of agriculture as a formal educational
discipline. For the first time, actual textbooks were written to
advance the agricultural sciences and farmers were formally
taught the most advanced methods of their craft. Advanced Chinese
irrigation methods were developed and previously unproductive
lands were brought into successful cultivation managed by local
officials Wu put in charge to oversee the process. Wu was the
first Chinese sovereign to emphasize agricultural policies and to
recognize the importance of successful agricultural production.
Beyond education and agriculture, Wu proved to be a patron of
many scholarly projects, allowing critics freedom of speech to
write about her as they wish-almost unheard of among sovereigns
of any time and place. Her military policies secured Chinese
borders from invasion and tightened national defense. She
encouraged Buddhism and made it the state religion over Daoism.
She emphasized women's history by employing scholars to write
biographies of women and their achievements, giving evidence to
the reality that women lack none of the talent associated with
their male counterparts. She even refused a written inscription
on her tomb so that history, not herself, made the ultimate
judgement on her legacy.
And so we have seen in Wu Zetian, the "Supreme Empress"
of China a woman of great complexity and ability, of courage, and
of tenacity to do whatever it took to achieve her goals. Empress
Wu was a wise and farsighted woman who saw the big picture and
understood the value of universal education, freedom in
scholarship, agriculture, and securing a nation's borders against
invasion. And though the clothing and foot binding custom of the
Tang dynasty demeaned and disenfranchised women, Wu herself
worked tirelessly to improve the status of women by showing
through example and commissioned records of the deeds of women
that gender is irrelevant in assessing the abilities of a person.
In many ways, Wu was a role model in a world that was
increasingly losing touch of the importance of women in society.
She was unafraid to use the same ruthless methods of her male
counterparts and for that, history has often scorned her. Yet she
was a woman of her time in action and ahead of her time in
innovations. Because of Wu Zetian, China became the world power
which rivaled and exceeded all the achievements glorified in the
ancient civilizations of Greece and Rome-and did so without a
foundation of warfare and conquest. We owe so many technologies
and ideas that we take for granted in the modern world to Wu's
foresight.
And so, though history may glorify the poetry of Meng Haoran or
Li Bai as the greatest achievement of the Tang dynasty or look to
Neo-Confucian writers as the cornerstones of Asian culture, we
can see clearly that without Wu Zetian our world today would be
greatly different.
For what sort of world would we live in had China not prospered
from her guidance? Would Marco Polo have had a reason to seek
China? Would any culture value education and scholarship had Wu
not set the example? So much we owe to her, the monarch whose
legacy is stained because she was
a woman.
Laurel A. Rockefeller | [email protected] | cell number: 908.720.7050 |