Entry for March 06, 2007 ON VALIDITY OF ROYAL TITLE - PRINCESS OF ARMENIA BLAH
CROWNED PRINCESS ROYAL OPINION ON DENMARK ASCENDANCY CURRUPTION AND POLITICAL BLUNDER AGAINST ITS ROYAL GENOCIDE
CURRENTLY ON EXILE IN PHILIPPINE ISLANDS
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:46:12 -0800 (PST)
From: princess aquirah windsor <[email protected]>
Subject: From Crowned Princess Royal Opinion
To: [email protected], Udenrigsministeriet <[email protected]>,
ministry of Justice DK <[email protected]>, jutice1 <[email protected]>
CURRENTLY ON EXILE IN PHILIPPINE ISLANDS
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:46:12 -0800 (PST)
From: princess aquirah windsor <[email protected]>
Subject: From Crowned Princess Royal Opinion
To: [email protected], Udenrigsministeriet <[email protected]>,
ministry of Justice DK <[email protected]>, jutice1 <[email protected]>
| Princess in legal term means daughter of a king. However a king cannot be a king if he doesnt have any title or in short properties inhirited upon birth, So therefore a child by inheritance is be addressed according to the nature of his inheritance, Take for example King Christian X, upon the birth of his 3rd son Margould 1900 Denmark has expanded terretory covering Unified Germany , So Margould was baptized as the Earl of Armenia, Earl because He was the 3rd son thats for the new terretory, And the Earl of Armenia has to inherit also Donauworth of King Frederick the Great as the 9th Duke of Marlborough. Actually the richer the King the more title to earned as long as the child has past all the genocide test. Okay what if the child cannot meet the standard of test even how the mother claimed the child was the king's son/daughter, to be honest the child was considered desgrace. And I think this is all the reason of political upleaval of Europe after ww2. This problem has actually resolved by constitutional will and by political parliamentary will in notion against the will of the King, to designate dummies in the royal throne. Denmark 1976 Queen protocol was not in reality related to the incombent royal family ,doesnt have actually a dominiom tittle but permitted to published propaganda genealogy for the sake of allege freedom of expression and quote. The European public accepted the idea that anyone is intitled to be addressed as princess regardless of no properties in donimium domain affinity attached in your name and birthright. By Statute absolute law the dummy Queen is actually considered a squater. But for the sake of Culture from 1974 to present, Citizens of Denmark has by all means as I assist it personally by reading all those allege publications has accepted the flattery of a dummy con royalty. Personally for me, it is not a good idea somewhere along the line this real owners of the land must surface and take initiative to seatle this despute with the government and save derrogation of royal genocide. After all the country's constitution and by laws depends its sanctity to the real genocide of the monarch who by all means in legal means acquired the whole nation by the power of purchased in honest to goodness for his family royalty sake. And I think its time for political renewal to simply respect the right of these valid willed claimant. So we can have a genuine flattery. In strick royal standard and by legal means you cannot be a princess /princes if you don't have a land or aquired properties that can qualify you to the crown, Charles has inherited wales so he was crowned prince of wales 1971 in UK together with the princess of Armenia 1971 in DK. If the parliament the Minister of Foreign Affairs has declared you HRH Princess of no land,then whats now atleast a princess by political notion, the Minister was very very rich and rich and powerful to have a deluding approval from parliament. Can I upply and have also my millions? I think I'm very qualified how about you guys? I just hope I didnt hurt anyone by telling the truth. My apology. And request to save this for future refferences. Thank you. Toast ...Noblesse! Source of Explanation - Captain Frederick of Oldenburg Magestrate on a private royal class 1971. |
2007-03-06 09:46:53 GMT