This was a short day, but an entertaining one. The Barometer (OSU's daily newspaper) reporter Nick was coming down, and they'll be here every week until Spade is finished. There was also a struggled trying to find poker players, and Nate Archer filled in along with an Avery guy named Andy. We had Tim Gobble again on camera and my roommate Sam helped him out.

This was the quickest I have ever worked on set. Man I was giving out directions like a machine gun! People were flying every which way, we were getting good angles and acting quickly. Overall it's a very energetic scene that ends excitingly.

I've been thinking a lot lately about the fundamentals of filmmaking. I mean, any old jerk can get a camera, set of some gothic lighting and get some funky angle, but does that make any movie any better? What's better, a fancy angle that lends nothing or a simple angle that complements the scene? In "For the Love of the Dame" I learned about pacing a movie. I thought that was brilliant, and that I had tapped into some hidden knowledge that not many people had. In "The Dingbat", I learned a lot about putting together a bigger production, and a lot about framing action. In "Springtime Love" I meddled around with camera tricks but otherwise didn't develope a whole lot. In "Spade on the River" I am learning a ton about picking appropriate camera angles. Sometimes the angles are fancy, but mostly they are plane. Actually, mostly they suck, to be honest. I'm learning. I look at a lot of the angles I have now and cringe, but I'm either reshooting them or living with them. Next movie I'll have all this stuff down like second nature.

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1