Los Angeles Times -
By ROBIN WRIGHT
20/03/2001
Aid: Support for the Iraqi National Congress has waned amid the group's
missteps on
funding and recruiting.
By ROBIN WRIGHT, Times Staff Writer
WASHINGTON--Despite millions of dollars in U.S. aid, the leading Iraqi
opposition group
has proved so hapless in making use of the money, accounting for it,
finding recruits for
Pentagon training and preventing its own fragmentation that the State
Department is
searching for alternatives.
The Iraqi National Congress is also now so out of favor in the Arab
world and in Turkey
that all but one of the states bordering Iraq have made clear to Secretary
of State Colin L.
Powell and other U.S. officials that they won't allow the group to
operate out of their
territories, officials say.
"Leaders in the region say that the INC now has no meaningful support
left inside Iraq and
even less ability to threaten, much less topple, [Iraqi President]
Saddam Hussein. They see
them as the gang that couldn't shoot straight," said a well-placed
administration official. "So
they see our involvement with the INC as a clear sign that we're not
serious about changing
the regime in Baghdad."
Although the INC still has support in key quarters of Washington, the
growing
questions about it mark a reversal of fortunes for a group once heralded
as the "future
liberators" of Baghdad led by the "George Washington" of Iraq.
In an attempt to prove the group's bona fides, INC leader Ahmad Chalabi
was in Iran last
week to set up an office in Tehran, to be paid for by U.S. aid--a move
that required a special
waiver from Washington because of American sanctions against Iran.
The opposition group hopes to use Iran as a base from which to send
about 100 operatives
into northern Iraq in three-person teams to gather news and "political
intelligence,"
according to U.S. officials and former intelligence agents who still
have contact with the
group.
But even this plan--which would be based out of the last front-line
state to consider allowing
the group to use its border with Iraq--has frustrated U.S. officials
because the INC has not
taken advantage of Pentagon training that might significantly enhance
its ability to carry out
this and other operations.
Many slots available for a wide variety of training courses have gone
unfilled, according to
U.S. officials. For other slots, the group came up late with names
of Iraqi candidates, leading
to a scramble to get them visas and accommodations.
One of the most contentious issues, however, is funding. The INC was
so slow to submit
proposals for $4 million from the last administration that the grant
ran out last month after
only half was spent. The INC had to reapply for it.
So far, only $3 million of the $97 million in Pentagon training or used
equipment, allocated
by Congress in the 1998 Iraqi Liberation Act, has been used. An additional
$25 million in
funding managed by the State Department is available to the group,
but again its plans have
stumbled on specifics and accounting.
One senior State Department official blamed some of the problems on
a "learning curve" and
said a still unfinished audit on the first part of the $4-million grant
had "no major problems
with embezzlement."
Questions Whether Aid Will Continue
But a U.S. official familiar with the funding said "serious questions"
remain about whether
the group has the ability to provide either "an overall game plan or
an accounting of its costs
that would warrant that kind of ongoing cooperation." Citing the delicate
diplomacy
involved, most officials contacted for this article asked that they
not be quoted by name.
The United States has tried to help by providing a lawyer, grant writer
and accountant to
assist in outlining how the group could use U.S. aid and how to account
for funds after they
have been spent, as U.S. law requires. But the INC still has major
problems in meeting U.S.
specifications, officials acknowledge.
The CIA, which played a major role in backing the INC from 1992 to 1996
when
they both had headquarters in northern Iraq, has ongoing questions
about how tens of
millions of dollars in earlier funding were used, according to former
intelligence agents who
worked with the group. The INC was forced to abandon most of its operations
in 1996 when
Hussein's troops swept through northern Kurdistan.
"There's still a black cloud over the INC because of the black hole
that money seemed to go
into," a former intelligence official said. Because of past disputes
over funds, as well as
tactics and goals, the U.S. intelligence community is now loath to
get involved with the
group, he added.
The growing frustration has led the Bush administration to look for
a wider group of Iraqi
dissidents either to change the group's leadership or to give them
some of the U.S. aid from
the $25 million that the INC has assumed it will receive.
Assistant Secretary of State Edward Walker met last week with three
leading Iraqi dissidents
outside the INC. He and other U.S. officials plan to talk to additional
exiles.
"We're not walking away from the INC. We're broadening our scope," the
senior State
Department official said. "We want to include those elements not in
the INC, particularly
Sunni Muslim interests and those who represent military interests in
Iraq. If we are going to
be serious about this, we have to seek broad representation inside
and outside Iraq and work
to enhance the efforts of everyone."
Comparisons to Nicaragua Effort
The INC still has strong support in Republican quarters in Congress
and in both the
Pentagon and Vice President Dick Cheney's office.
"We support the INC 100%. The goal of our policy has to be the overthrow
of Hussein, and
the INC is the umbrella group willing to take the risks to do that,"
said Marc Thiessen,
spokesman for Republicans on the Senate Foreign Relations committee
chaired by Sen. Jesse
Helms (R-N.C.).
"Our strategy in Iraq must be the same as in Nicaragua, which was to
provide the means and
training necessary for the Contras to take back their country. Every
argument used against
the INC was used against the Contras. Until the U.S. got serious about
helping, the Contras
also weren't any more organized than the INC. And with the Contras,
we eventually
overthrew a dictatorship together."
The INC's new Iran operation is critical as a way to prove that the
group can be effective and
deserves additional support.
"This program is a test of the INC's ability to operate in an effective
way, and then we'll see
what the options are for further activities," the senior State Department
official said.
If the group succeeds in its field operations, expands both leadership
and membership, and
accurately accounts for its expenditures in better-designed proposals,
it could gain U.S.
approval to open offices in Syria, Egypt and the
Czech Republic, where Radio Free Iraq is based--pending approval of
the three countries.
But even supportive U.S. officials acknowledge that the group is no
longer the only outlet to
challenge Baghdad.
"I have confidence that the INC could be a productive element in an
overall U.S. program on
Iraq," the administration official said. "But exactly how to get regime
change will depend on
a whole host of considerations, only one of which could be the INC."
Another of the most contentious issues is Chalabi himself, whom critics
now refer to as a
"limousine insurgent" or an "armchair guerrilla with homes in Georgetown
and London."
For at least three years, the United States has been trying to get
Chalabi to share power,
without success.
Leader Called More Liability Than Asset
A former U.S. diplomat who had extensive dealings with Chalabi described
him as
"personally brave, very resourceful, extremely smart," but said he
also has many negatives
that increasingly make him more of a political liability than an asset.
"Most influential Iraqis don't see him as an acceptable leader," the
envoy said. "And he isn't
highly regarded by key states in the region, on which he has to depend
to conduct
meaningful operations against the regime."
Arab envoys interviewed last week used scathing or derisive language
to describe Chalabi.
One diplomat called him a crook. Chalabi was indicted in Jordan on
charges of embezzling
millions from Petra Bank, which he once headed. Chalabi claims the
issue has been quietly
resolved, which Jordanian officials dispute.
Chalabi is also a Shiite Muslim, which has increasingly given his group
a Shiite flavor as it
has fragmented.
"There are virtually no major Sunni figures in the INC. Kurds are there
in name only, and
they're doing nothing to bring down the regime now. And other Shiites
are not really
players," the former intelligence official said. "So it's really just
Chalabi alone."
Including Sunnis in either the INC or an alternative opposition force
is critical because
Hussein's inner circle and the political elite are predominantly Sunni.
For a decade, U.S.
intelligence has argued that the most likely regime change will be
made by Sunnis close to
Hussein, not exiled opposition groups.
To explore a role for Sunni exiles, Walker met last week with Gen. Najib
Salihi, Hatem
Mukhlis and Mudar Shawkat--all three Sunni Muslims. But U.S. officials
fear that Chalabi
may once again manipulate efforts to expand the INC or create alternative
Iraqi opposition
forces.
******************
The
Kurdistan Observer
www.kurdistanobserver.com