jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj

                                          Directions:  Assign 3 points to a category if the site appears to meet all the criteria.  Assign 2 points to a category if a site appears to meet most of the criteria.  Assign 1 point to a category if the site appears to meet a few of the criteria.  Assign 0 points to a category if the site appears not to meet any of the criteria.  If the site gets a score of 38 to 42 it could be considered to be excellent.  If the site gets a score of 32 to 37 it could be considered to be good.  It the site receives a score of 27 to 31 it can be considered to be fair and a score of less than 27 could be considered to be poor.
CATEGORY CRITERIA POSSIBLE POINTS POINTS ASSIGNED
Relevancy The information adds to what you need to know.
3
jjj
Point of View or Bias The source should provide accurate information.  It is not an advertisement.  The source should not contain contests, giveaways, or persuasive language.  It should not contain jokes or pranks or try to sell you a product.
3
jj
Authorship The Author should be well known and associated with a well known organization or was recommended by a person you trust.  There should be an address and phone number, as well as an e-mail address.
3
jj
Publishing Body The name of the publishing organization should be given.  Is it an official web site?  This could be a journal, educational institution, government site, or a news or commercial site.  There should be a link to the publishing body.
3
jj
Verifiability There should be a bibliography that can help verify the information by leading the students to the original works.  Further searches should lead to the same information on other sites.
3
jj
Currency The site should tell you when it was created and when it was last updated. 
3
jj
Access/Speed The pages should load in 10 seconds or less under normal circumstances
3
jj
Graphics The images are attractive and load quickly.  They are appropriate for the information.  The site can be viewed without graphics in a text only mode.
3
jj
Navigation There should be hypertext links to allow users to navigate the site easily.  Links should be located at both the top and bottom of each page.  All links should be working.
3
jj
 Consistency of design There should be consistency in design throughout the site. 
3
jj
Contact Web master There should be a way to report problems to the web master.
3
jj
Sight impaired access There should be a text only version to allow sight impaired persons to use a text reader to access the information.
3
jj
Typography The fonts used are easy to read.  The fonts, headers, and subheaders are consistent throughout the site.  Hypertext words are clearly denoted.  The white space is used to make reading easier.
3
jj
Spelling/Grammar Errors There is evidence that the text has been edited to remove spelling and grammar errors. 
3
jj
Total Points Assigned
42
jj
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj

 
         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Greer, T.,Holinga, D., Kindel, C. & Netznik, M. (1999). Methods of Evaluation. [On-line].  Available:
     http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/wp/credibility/index.html
Montecino,V. (1998). Criteria to Evaluate the Credibility of World Wide Web Resources. [On-line].  Available:
     http://mason.gmu.edu/~montecin/web-eval-sites.htm
NT Website Hostig,  [On-line].  Argus Clearinghouse.  Available: http://www.clearinghouse.net/ratings.html
Rutledge, S. T.(1998). Good Sites [On-line]. Available: http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/students/srutledg/goodsites9.html
Schrock, K. (1998). Kathy Schrock's Guide for Educators - Evaluation .[On-line]. Available:
      http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/eval.html
Schrock, K. (1999). The ABCs of Web-site Evaluation. [On-line]. Classroom Connect. Available:
     http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/eval.html
Staines, G. M. (1996). Evaluating Information found on the Internet. [On-line].  Available:
     http://lme.mankato.msus.edu/class/629/cred.html

 

           

May 2, 2000

           

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1