A lot of my developments lead up to a realistic stab
at it, relevant to you, and shed light on my style of
thinking. So here I go.
I talk of physical immortality. I do not question the
beliefs of those who would get it otherwise. I happen to believe that my
methods are complementary and orthogonal to these beliefs. The overview of
immortality is simple too – if you can postpone death reliably for a century
every time, mathematically you get immortality. The kind of immortality I talk
about has physical uses too – I do not believe in the existence of hyperspaces
or wormholes or other tricks to make communication or material transfer faster
than speed of light. Still I see no limits on humans roaming the galaxy and the
Universe, they just go into statis. So immortality is really a study of statis.
Now humans are simply a large collection of cells.
Cells have to divide so that their context remains alive. As long as the
replication is error-free, nothing but physical injury can kill the organism.
Errors can happen in the replication due to chemical reasons with a certain
fixed probability, essential to how humans evolved, and also the basis of
cancers. Erroneous replications have to die and this happens because cells have
a built-in clock that prohibits division beyond a certain number of times,
using portions called telomerases. Endless division is precisely cancer. Or
they can have misfolded proteins leading to dead cells and diseases like
Alzheimer’s or mad cow. External agents can insert their DNA’s to modify the
cell itself, giving rise to AIDS etc.
Even when a cell is healthy, its environment can be
screwed up for it needs regular supply of energy and means to convert it. That
is bulk of conventional medicine and is outside the
scope of these thoughts.
Statis then must have two
components, both essential – indefinite cellular replication, and elimination
of erroneous replications. I call it controlled cancer
and is the basis of immortality as per me. A cancer would be just a tumor to be
surgically removed unless mobile cells became cancerous. In most cases however,
death occurs due to metastasis. That is why early detection and aggressive
intervention is so important.
Required consequences that
make the technological advances giddily exciting side-effects of this style of
thinking and development are understandings of the process of hibernation,
stunning advances in medicine, treatments of simple disorders, successful attacks on aging, and developments in solar
and galactic travels.
Clearly I have contempt for
empirical work past the progenesis phase – maintainance workers must not be
allowed to become dominant – and a deep respect for science to go where no one
has before.
So what is the relevance to you? One of the obscene truths I confronted and
vanquished twenty years ago is the realization that there was only 1 of me and
so much to do. One of the horrendous consequences of that was my application of
industrial psychology truths to myself. I was spending an inordinate amount of
time on troubleshooting. One way to control that drain is to make trouble
shooting itself productive. For example, not only am I striving to get married,
I am using this effort to debug a lot of my document production software with
many CRM (consumer relation management) applications! As long as I restrict the
amount of time and money on some project, I feel I don’t have to justify the
utility and appropriateness of any project with no serious negative
consequences. A simple part of being nuts I think. My family has always humored
me, my ex-wife to a certain point; I do not think I am insane. On the negative
side, promptness and temporal sanity of others goes out of the window with my
way of doing things. As a manager, the worst scenario I can imagine is a whole
bunch of employees like me. So what is the solution to dilemma of scientific
advancement versus management sanity? The Bell labs solution: It consumed 6% of
AT&T budget, no politics around this number. It even tolerated us when we
called its executives the blue suits.
|
|
|
|
Health - HealthScoutNews |
|
|
|
Testosterone: Shot in the Arm for What Ails Aging Males Mon Aug 5, 2:05 PM ET By Robert Preidt MONDAY, Aug. 5 (HealthScoutNews) -- You're a middle-age guy who
can still spot your 40th birthday in the rear-view mirror without having to
squint through your new glasses.
However, you can't quite shake the nagging suspicion that your
performance is starting to slip -- in the boardroom, the bedroom, or the
sports field. The problem may be low testosterone levels. And a simple 10-part
questionnaire could help determine whether testosterone replacement therapy
is the way to put that spring back into your step. Lack of energy, depression, decreased work and sports
performance, falling asleep after dinner, muscle loss, fat gain, low libido,
weak erections -- these are just some of the symptoms of low testosterone
levels, also referred to as andropause. It's a common problem. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( news
- web
sites) estimates that 4 million to 5 million American men suffer from low
testosterone, but only about 5 percent receive treatment. The Androgen Deficiency in Aging Men (ADAM) questionnaire could
improve those treatment numbers by helping men 40 and older recognize the
signs of testosterone decline, a slow process that can occur over 10 to 15
years. The questionnaire was developed by gerontology professor Dr.
John Morley, director of the geriatric medicine division at St. Louis
University School of Medicine. "We used to say, 'You're getting old.' Well, now we know
you're getting old because your male hormones are going down, and replacement
of your male hormones may make you feel younger and be more active and more
effective," Morley says. It would be far too expensive to do regular hormone tests on all
men over 40. So, the questionnaire is a cheap, effective screening tool to
educate and encourage men to talk with their doctors about low testosterone. If a man's answers to the 10 questions show a potential problem,
his doctor can then do a hormone test to check the testosterone levels. If there's a deficiency, the man may need testosterone
replacement therapy, which can offer a major improvement in the quality of
his life, Morley says. At least 70 percent of men who have testosterone replacement
therapy get relief from their symptoms, and almost every man will have an
increase in his muscle mass and perhaps in his bone mineral density, Morley
says. "It's very effective. You can normalize testosterone
levels," says Dr. Richard F. Spark, director of Beth Israel Deaconess
Medical Center's Steroid Research Lab in Boston. Some compare low testosterone in men to menopause in women, but
Spark says that's somewhat misleading. "There is nothing dramatic that happens in men, like the
hot flashes occurring in women that signal that there's some disruption in
hormone production," says Sparks, who's also the author of Sexual
Health for Men: The Complete Guide. While women experience an abrupt decline in estrogen production,
men have a gradual ebbing of testosterone. Many men on testosterone treatment feel stronger, more
confident, have an improved sense of well-being and are more effective at
work, Spark says. In the United States, testosterone replacement therapy is done
three ways -- with injections, skin patches or skin gel. Injections are
administered every two weeks; the patches and gel need to be applied every
day. It's also a lifetime commitment. "If they want to keep their testosterone levels increased,
they will have to do this for the rest of their lives," Spark says. He cautions that testosterone therapy isn't a fountain of youth.
If you're 60 years old, it won't restore your buff 21-year-old physique -- if
you ever really had one. "There are other men who are expecting too much from the
treatment, and are disappointed when they don't get the results that they
fantasize about," Spark says. As for side effects, "the major concern has always been whether
testosterone supplementation would put a man at greater risk for developing
prostate cancer ( news
- web
sites) than men who haven't received testosterone supplementation,"
Spark says. "But there's really no evidence that testosterone
supplementation puts a man at greater risk for developing prostate cancer
than another man his age who has the same testosterone level normally and is
not taking testosterone supplements," Spark adds. Some men receiving testosterone treatment also need to have
their red blood cell count monitored. The therapy can sometimes elevate red
blood cell counts to dangerously high levels, and could increase the risk of
stroke. In those cases, the testosterone treatment should be stopped, Spark
says. Here's the ADAM questionnaire. If you answer "yes" to
questions one through seven, or "yes" to three or more questions,
Morley suggests you make an appointment with your doctor to discuss the
results. ·
Do
you have a decrease in libido?
|