Why is hard to write anything in english (hindi too!)?
Consider the author A and the oset of readers R.i. The context C is clear to A, perhaps some of R.i, but not others. But C is an oset too C.j. Each R.i knows distinct C.j oset. The only reasonable thing for A to do is to construct a union of all C.j so that all R.i can subset accordingly. A VAMPIRE lawyer is also simply a moron who can argue "where is it written!".
Here is my scheme to bugger them. Build uniform documents that cover nearly anything. Save work by lot of cross linking. Put a link to the overview in every document. The fascinating thing is that any one who follows all the links would be exremely stupid, yet that is how even simple navigation happens and hence can not be deprecated as a construction designed solely to stupidify the VAMPIRE Sir Lawyer.
For normal humans, I suggest that links all have a color, geometry, etc word associated with them. Choose the word to have no legal semantics at all - like dots in stores. These labels have whatever semantics the author thinks is useful to readers.
With this approach, some will be able to argue
1. The text is here. Of course the VAMPIRE will be buggered well by then trying to locate the relevant things.
2. We built nothing to damage the lawyer intentionally.
3. Any depracory language is none of our business for we only linked to explicitly allowing sites!
If you think you will be out of the woods - open your eyes for we talk of American Lawyers! Nevertheless, you will become a more painful bird to catch, less tasty to eat, and capable of hitting back some.
How do you distinguish honor and cowardice?
It is cowardice but acceptable in my world to run away from a superior enemy. It is dishonourable and unacceptable not to destroy such an enemy once the superiority is gone. Rationale: your wife and children pay for your bravery. Witness Amerindiand, blacks, opium wars in china, India. Contrast to Nazi in stalingrad.
Yes my philosophy is anti-gita, but look at what Mahabharat did to India. Was krishna an incarnation of god or devil? You answer it yourself after this quote (The Bhagvatgita, Gita press, Gorakhpur, pg 49) "Intermixture of castes leads the destroyers of the race as well as the race itself to hell. Deprived of the offerings of lumps of rice and water, the manes of their race also fall. Through these evils bringing about an intermixture of castes, the age-long caste-traditions and family-customs of the destroyers of the race get extinct." I interpret this as an ancient Brahmin ploy to keep others in line, and modern declaration against my chasing women here (Wrong caste).
Can some one get away from American lawyers?