The
Texas Governor
The Governor of Texas
is the chief executive of the state and is elected by the citizens every four years. The Governor must be a
The Governor makes
policy recommendations that lawmakers in both the House and Senate chambers may
sponsor and introduce as bills. The Governor appoints the Secretary of State,
as well as members of boards and commissions who oversee the heads of state
agencies and departments.
The constitutional and
statutory duties of the Governor include:
·
*Signing or vetoing bills passed by the Legislature.
·
*Serving as commander-in-chief of the state's military forces.
·
*Convening special sessions of the Legislature for specific
purposes.
·
*Delivering a report on the condition of the state to the
Legislature at the beginning of each regular session.
·
*Estimating of the amounts of money required to be raised by
taxation.
·
*Accounting for all public moneys received and paid out by him and
recommending a budget for the next two years.
·
*Granting reprieves and commutations of punishment and pardons
upon the recommendation of the Board of Pardons and Paroles and revoking
conditional pardons.
·
*Declaring special elections to fill vacancies in certain elected
offices.
·
*Appointing qualified Texans to state offices that carry out the
laws and direct the policies of state government. Some of these offices are
filled by appointment only. Others are ordinarily elected by the people, but
the Governor must occasionally appoint individuals to fill vacancies in those
offices. The Governor also appoints Texans to a wide range of advisory bodies
and task forces that assist him with specific issues.
Texas Executive Branch
is divided among independently elected agency heads—in accordance with
Jacksonian democratic theory (that most officeholders should be elected);
Typically the governor
is a moderate-to-conservative male WASP with background in business or law.
Democratic Primary is
usually a contest between liberal-to-moderate and moderate-to-conservative
candidates, with the latter usually winning.
Republican Primary
usually competitive between moderate-to-conservative candidates (when the seat
is vacant—competition in the primaries when an incumbent is seeking reelection
is rare and discouraged)
--Big $$ is spent for the candidate to receive name
recognition
Tenure/Removal/Succession
Since there are no term
limits, the time a governor may serve will depend on the mood of the electorate
and the willingness of the incumbent to continue to run for reelection.
The only other available means of removal of the governor
is impeachment by the state house of representatives (by majority vote) and
conviction by the senate (by 2/3 majority vote)
Lt. Governor succeeds the governor if the latter resigns,
dies, or is otherwise incapacitated.
Should both governor and lt. governor become disqualified, the president
pro tempore of the state senate becomes governor. Upon the accession of the lt. governor to the governor’s office,
the state senate elects one of its own to serve as lt. governor until the next
legislative session begins.
Governor’s staff is
professional, full-time. Staff will
provide information and assistance to the governor in carrying out state
administrative policy and law.
--Staff will serve as advisors in securing gubernatorial
appointments to state boards, agencies and commissions and to the state
judiciary in case of vacancy
--Staff will serve as liaisons between the governor’s
office and the legislature. Will effectively serve as lobbyists for the
governor’s office, pressing for the governor’s legislative agenda.
--Staff will assist the governor in planning, in
conjunction with various state agencies and various local and regional councils
of government to bring them into harmony with state aims
Governor’s Tools of Persuasion
Governor has weak formal
powers as granted by the state constitution.
His ability to exercise informal powers will depend in part on the
nature of the formal powers, as well as his own personality, prestige, PR
ability, political expertise, political supporters, the political climate of
the state, and his own luck.
Formal tools of
persuasion:
VETO: formal legislative tool (may be overridden by 2/3
vote of the legislature—rarity that this happens; only one veto overridden in
the last 60 years)
--made effective by the shortness of the sessions (most
bills are going to be permanently vetoed, largely because the governor has 10
days during the session to act, and because most important bills are passed in
the last few days of the session; should the session expire before the governor
vetoes the bill, there is nothing the legislature can do to attempt to
override).
--Governor is in strong legislative bargaining position
simply by being able to threaten a veto; this may force the legislature to
reconsider the content of certain bills that are must-pass, but may cause
controversy between the governor and the legislature. Pressure is also put on executive agencies if, when threatening a
veto, the governor is threatening to cut the lifeline of crucial state $$ to
them. The agencies may then be forced
to bring their administrative activities into line with the governor’s policy
aims. ---This also gives the governor leverage with lobbyists (should the
lobbyist decide to support the governor’s programs, the lobbyist may in turn
receive promise from the governor not to veto bills that are vital to that
lobbyist’s clients).
--Line Item Veto makes it possible for the governor to veto
appropriations within a larger appropriations bill (this is an all-or-nothing
power; the line item veto cannot be used to reduce appropriations, it can only
be used to remove them altogether)
BARGAINING POWER: Political leaders working with the
governor will weigh costs and benefits. Must be willing to give in order to
give.
--Governor’s commitment to a bill may determine if
negotiation over it is possible
--Timing of a bill coming out of the legislature is
crucial; if a bill is brought up too late in the session, it may not receive
any attention. Governor can work with
the legislative leadership to determine when and how a bill will be discussed
--Contributors may have influence over when a bill will
have gubernatorial support or not. Those who give will often receive, though
not always.
--Governor’s hope of future campaign support, either for
reelection to the governor’s post, or for higher office may determine his/her
position on a bill
--Who supports/opposes the bill? Are these credible,
legitimate, and powerful lobbies or constituent groups, or are they fringe
groups with little popularity?
--Degree of legislative support or opposition for the
governor’s position may determine where the governor actually falls on a
political issue. Support for a losing cause may => loss of prestige or
respectability in the eyes of the public
--What are the political benefits to be gained? Those
offering greater benefits will often receive more favorable attention from the
governor. (e.g., if the interests that support a certain position are strong
politically, then the governor may agree to go along with them; if they are
politically small and weak, then he may not go along with them)
--Fear of alienating interests that may provide
postgubernatorial economic opportunities or political assistance (no one wants
to damage their chances of financial security and such in the long run, by
signing bills that may be harmful to one’s own personal chances of success
after political life)
--Bargaining and agreements during the pressession season
between the governor, legislative leadership, special interests, and state
bureaucrats greatly enhances the chances of a bill receiving favorable
attention and passage through the legislature during the session. –Failure to reach an agreement will usually
result in the death of the bill, either by legislative neglect (if it was the
governor’s pet bill) or gubernatorial veto (if it was the legislature’s pet
bill).
--hope of success after presession bargaining and
agreement, because both the legislative leadership and governor are one the
same side; no threat of a veto is necessary, keeping the governor on good terms
with the legislature; legislative leadership knows that the bill will receive
the governor’s signature if it is passed out of the legislature.
Special sessions:
legislative subjects of special sessions are determined solely by the governor
(legislature may act independently on non-legislative subjects, e.g.,
resolutions, constitutional amendments, appointments, impeachments, etc.)
--last for 30 days only
--special sessions are bargaining tools with special
interests, because one side may be for having a session, another side may be
against it; special sessions allow the attention of the whole state political
process to be directed to one specific area of policy (e.g., school finance
reform or redistricting)
Message power of the
governor: State of the State address required at the start of each legislative
session
--governor, to be effective, must use mass media wisely—“go
public” only for vital legislation. Use
of the media for ordinary legislation may => public apathy for any
gubernatorial initiatives.
Fact-Finding
Commissions (Blue-Ribbon Commissions): appointed by the governor from various
ranks of citizens, politicians and interest group representatives.
--used to float trial balloons for certain issues to measure
public enthusiasm or acceptance
--may be used to increase support for a measure
--may be used to delay the consideration of political hot
potatoes
Executive Tools of Persuasion
Governor has high
responsibilities, but no direct power granted to meet them by the constitution.
--Fragmentation of the executive branch of the
--Indirect appointment powers for several agency heads;
governor appoints board or commission, which in turn appoints the chief
executive of the agency
--boards/commissions are usually appointed for a fixed,
6-year term. These are staggered, so that the governor in power has a difficult
time getting a majority of his own appointees on a board at any given time
during his administration
--lobbies may affect the outcome of gubernatorial
appointments; if a special interest group is intensely opposed to a person
being appointed to a board, then the governor may go with the demands of the
interest group; the governor may also pressure the interest group to change its
focus and to concede some items on its agenda.
--Senatorial courtesy—senators usually defer to the
appointee’s home district senator and decline confirmation if that senator
deems the appointee “personally obnoxious”.
--Administrators within the agencies want a sympathetic
commissioner or board member, will lobby the governor to get what they want
--judicial appointments during a term for judges who resign
or die or are removed during their term of office.
--Governor may not remove elected officials from office—nor may he
issue directive orders to state agencies not complying with the governor’s view
of how a law should be interpreted and enforced. Change may be brought about only by the governor’s own effective
use of his power to “go public”.
Bureaucracy is designed to
administer the law and to implement public policy. It is the part of government that most citizens will have contact
with in some form or fashion for most of their lives.
As society grows more
complex, bureaucracy will also proliferate (Max Weber’s theory)—the diversity
of the population will increase, the resources needed will multiply, and the
difficulty of knowing one’s neighbors will => need for further regulation of
various aspects of human relationships.
State bureaucracy and local
bureaucracy are much larger per capita than the national bureaucracy; much of
what we encounter regularly in “government” is state or local bureaucracy.
--some efforts to reduce size of government have
=> privatization of many social service and health/safety services,
etc. (e.g., prisons, drug rehab.
programs, ambulance services, trash collection, road construction, etc.)
--Unfunded federal mandates to states (national
government directs the states to comply with a new program created in federal
law but does not provide monetary support to make compliance possible. =>
states scrambling to raise taxes or to cut social programs [makes the states
look bad, the national government remains untarnished])
--Unfunded state mandates to special districts or to
cities and counties (e.g., state mandates that the public school classroom size
be only 20 students leaves districts desperately trying to find ways to skirt
the mandate or to cut back on some programs or teachers’ salaries)
Ideally, bureaucracy is
supposed to be “neutral” in its policymaking decisions and in its
administration of the law
--national government instituted civil service exams
and merit-based promotion to attempt to reach neutrality
--TX government has established a board/commission
system with an appointed board/commission that is not very susceptible to
gubernatorial removal, and that then appoints an executive director to head the
agency and conduct day-to-day agency operations and administration
--local districts and cities have instituted
non-partisan elections and council-manage systems of government (in many cases)
--Reality is that PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IS POLITICS,
because politics is a public decision-making process that affects the course of
public life
Ideally, bureaucracy is
structured hierarchically, with a chief executive at the top and the
administrators and such below him/her to follow his/her orders.
--
--TX
government does not have a centralized bureaucracy, thus does not have a
well-defined hierarchy of power.
Ideally, bureaucrats are
specialized in their areas of expertise => “better, more efficient administration
and is a major source of bureaucratic power.”
It is impossible to separate
formulation of policy (legislative activity) from administration of policy
(bureaucratic activity) --- Politically successful agencies grow; those that
are failures will be cut and grafted or left to die.
Clientele Groups will ally with state agencies. Political bedfellows
will often work together to see that rules and regulations are implemented that
are to the benefit of all involved (state agencies often are closely tied to
special interests and regulate industries or professions very loosely)
--interest groups lobbying on behalf of agencies—seeking
allies in the legislature to gain appropriations for some state agencies at the
expense of other state agencies (each bureaucratic agency seeks to acquire as
much money as possible, even if it means reducing programs at other state
agencies)
Chairmen of legislative
committees often are sought as allies by the state administrators
--more often though, state administrators seek
alliances with the legislative leadership and chairs of the senate finance
committee and house appropriations committee
Governor’s impact on the
bureaucracy: influence over legislature in appropriations bills, etc., relating to the agencies
--appointments to boards and commissions, though
limited; decentralized executive authority in the state has => increased
administrative autonomy.
Iron Texas Star: special
interests need friends in the bureaucracy and in the legislature and in the
governor’s office. All five areas
(house, senate, governor, bureaucracy, and special interests work together to
formulate public policy that will be favorable for all parties affected by it).
--maintaining friendships; putting friends in power
and keeping the friends in power once there
Good public relations for the
agency is crucial sometimes in getting appropriations requests granted and winning
battles with other state agencies for limited dollars available. E.g., the DPS and the TDCJ receive better
public approval and visibility than the Alcoholic Beverage Commission or the
Texas Lottery Commission
Longtime government employees
may be real brains behind creation and implementation of various laws—career bureaucrats
often pull the strings behind the scenes; gubernatorial appointees and elected
execs. usually are not the power behind the operations.
Collection of information
about types of legislation needed
--information is given by or interpreted by an agency
in its own interests’ favor
Administrative Law: meaning of the law (passed in the legislature) is defined by administrative law, as are the effects of the law on special interests and the general public
--administrative law may in fact modify the decisions
made by public officials. Executives
often have a wide range of possibilities for enforcing the law, and may choose
which laws to enforce and which to ignore
Accountability within the
Bureaucracy:
--Elective Accountability: difficult to determine
popular will or public interest, since most people who vote for these state
agents are the staunchly politically active.
Elected administrators are more or less “invisible” from the public eye,
because they do not try to attract attention to themselves.
--Legislative Accountability: Sunset Advisory
Commission (to expand, diminish, or renew existing agencies on a 12-year basis;
operates independently to review agencies and sends recommendations to the
legislature for final action on those recommendations). – Problems of indebtedness of legislators to
special interests also make it difficult for the legislature to hold the state
agencies responsible for their activities – Legislative committee hearings are “invisible”
to the public eye (most people will never go to Austin to watch what is going
on behind the scenes) – Prominent legislative boards are not visible to the
public, either (e.g., the Legislative Budget Board, the Legislative Audit
Committee, the Legislative Council)
--Accountability to the Governor: would result in a
cabinet system much like that in place at the federal level in the United
States; governor’s office is visible to the public (and gets blamed for
problems, anyway); does not solve the problem of entrenched interest group
activity, however.
--Bureaucratic Accountability: Accountability to the
special interests that the agencies regulate => regulations in favor of the
very professions and industries that are ostensibly the subject of government
restraint
--open meetings laws require all
government bodies to hold their meetings in public
--open records laws require all
boards, etc., to publish their proceedings and make them available to the
public for only the cost of the reproduction of them.
--whistleblowers are protected from
retaliation by superiors under state law, but they may still suffer for their
actions within the office
--ombudsmen serve in some agencies as
the intermediary between citizen and agency when the former feels the latter
has committed an injustice or administrative error or oversight
Texas Administration:
No one single individual is
really in charge of the administrative bodies.
Over 220 separate agencies, boards, and commissions operate each more or
less independently of the governor and the legislature and of each other—significant
degree of overlapping jurisdiction and confusion in which offices are
responsible for which areas of policy.
Elected Executives: elected
because the constitutional writers hoped to prevent the concentration of power
in any one single individual government official. => general public’s
ignorance of administrators’ identities and activities.
Attorney General (Greg Abbot)—Lawyer for all state
officials and agencies; may interpret the laws in absence of court opinions
(interpretations of the AG are not binding on state officials or anyone else);
represents the state in civil and criminal litigation (mostly in the higher state
courts and in federal courts); heads an office of about 500 lawyers who serve
as assistant attorneys general
--anti-trust
--consumer protection
--insurance, banking, and securities
--child protective services
--law enforcement
--environmental protection
--highways and transportation
--charitable trusts
Comptroller of Public Accounts (Carol Keeton
Strayhorn)—overseer of the state’s financial activities
--tax collection
--pre-audit accounting officer;
certification of approximate state income for biennium
--certifies state financial condition
at the close of the fiscal year
--managing state deposits and
investments
--paying warrants
--enforcing tobacco laws
Commissioner of the General Land Office (Jerry
Patterson)—manager of the state’s public lands’ rentals and leases
--awards leases for exploration of
state lands and state’s mineral rights
--chairs the Veterans Land Board (low
interest loans to veterans for land/home purchases and home improvements)
--chairs School Land Board (oversees
approx. 20 min. acres of public land that may be leased or explored for
minerals—approx. $190 min. dedicated to public education’s Permanent School
Fund)
Commissioner of Agriculture (Susan Combs)—administration
of law, research, education and regulatory activities relating to agriculture
--checking meat market scales
--inspecting gas pumps for accuracy
--administrative laws for labeling
pesticides
--promoting the Texas agricultural products
--serving the interests of both
agribusiness (principal constituency) and farm-workers and consumers.
Lt. Governor (David Dewhurst)—serves as ex officio
chair of Legislative Budge Board, Legislative Council, and Legislative Audit
Committee. Influences Sunset Advisory Council
and Legislative Criminal Justice Board.
Appointed Executives: meant
to be held to greater gubernatorial accountability
Secretary of State (Roger Williams)—serves at
pleasure of governor
--custodian of the State Seal
--state’s chief elections officer
--records repository for the state
officials and businesses and commercial interests
--publishes rules and regulations
issued by the state agencies
--commissions notaries public
Adjutant General: 2-year term, chief administrative
officer of the Texas National Guard and State Guard
Health and Human Services Commissioner—heads the
Consolidated Texas Health and Human Services System. Probably, this is the most
cabinet-like agency in the Texas government.
Insurance Commissioner—2-year term; regulates the
Texas insurance industry
Boards and Commissions: some
are elected, others are appointed, some are a combination of both
Texas Railroad Commission (Victor Carillo, Michael
Williams, and Elizabeth Ames Jones)—three-member commission, each elected
statewide in partisan elections for a six-year term (staggered)
--regulation of the state’s oil and
natural gas utilities, pipelines, and drilling and pumping
--regulation of the state’s
intrastate railroad transportation
--regulation of the oil and gas
industry’s waste disposal
--protection of the surface and
subsurface water supplies from oil/gas contamination
State Board of Education—elected from 15 separate
districts in partisan elections for staggered 4-yr. terms
--policymaking body overseeing the
Texas Education Agency
--state commissioner of education is
appointed by the governor
--chair of SBOE is appointed from the
membership by the governor for a 2-year term
Ex Officio Boards (members
hold their places on the board by virtue of serving in another office)
Texas Bond Review Board—comprised of lt. governor,
speaker, governor, comptroller.
--reviews/approves all bonds and long-term
debt of state agencies
Agriculture Resources Protection Authority (15
members, 9 are ex officio, the rest are appointed)
Texas Cosmetology Commission (7 members, one ex
officio, rest appointed)
Texas Turnpike Authority (12 members, 3 ex officio)
Appointed Boards (selected by
the governor with senate consent; may be selected by other officials, depending
on the board’s importance)
Usually unsalaried, set policies for their agencies,
appoint their own chief administrators
Staggered terms, usually 6-years in length.
Appointees often representative of the groups with
economic interests in the board’s policies and politics.