KEN STREMSKY DISCUSSES FARMING HONEYBEES AND OUR FOOD SUPPLY The May 14, 2002 Washington Post on page A1 has a very important article with the title "Honeybees in a Mite More Than Trouble: Parasites, an Exodus of Apiarists and Budget Cuts Imperil Vital Insect" by Adrian Higgins. I read the article on www.washingtonpost.com. After you read this section, I hope you will read the full article and my farm subsidies section located on this website and ask yourself why we are giving billions of dollars in farm subsidies to Fortune 500 companies while cutting back on funding dealing with honeybees which are essential for our food supply. Congress should pass a law that says that beekeepers and orchardists should not have to pay a federal tax rate greater than ten percent on the first $10,000,000 in profits they obtain each year from beekeeping and/or orchards. Congress should make sure that no bee research laboratories are closed. Congress should make sure we have at least 10 bee research labs. Congress should also increase the funding of the bee research labs to at least $25 million a year, and make sure the combined staff of the research labs has at least 80 people. Congress should also give at least $30 million more dollars to the National Institutes of Health for genome sequencing of organisms, tell the National Institutes of Health to immediately start genome sequencing the honeybee with at least $15 million. Congress should make sure at least $100 million in farm subsidies goes to beekeepers and orchardists. FARM SUBSIDIES I realize how important farmers are to our country. I want our country to have more small farms including family owned farms. Congress should pass a law that says that farmers do not have to pay a federal tax rate greater than 10 percent on the first $10,000,000 in profits they make each year. I found articles about farm subsidies when I typed farm subsidies on www.google.com. The Daily Telegraph which is published in Britain and has the website www.telegraph.co.uk has an article with the title "Britain attacks $51 bn in US farm subsidies" written by David Wastell and Francis Elliott. You may find out more information about farm subsidies and which Fortune 500 companies are getting farm subsidies by going to the Environmental Working Group's Farm Subsidy Database which is located at www.ewg.org/farm. I believe that farm subsidies are often a good idea for small farms. I think it is usually insane to give farm subsidies to Fortune 500 companies. I think farm subsidies should usually not be given to businesses that have yearly sales greater than $50,000,000 a year. When we give farm subsidies to businesses that make more than $50,000,000 a year, we have less money available to give to small farms and farming communities that need the money a lot more. Our country might not want to give farm subsidies to businesses that make more than $10,000,000 a year. FARMING FOR FISH The May 9, 2002 Union Leader has a great editorial with the title "Farming for fish: There is a better way to reap the ocean's bounty." The editorial may be found on the Union Leader's website which is www.theunionleader.com. I believe government should create property rights dealing with fish farming. Congress may want to pass a law that says that businesses that farm for fish do not have to pay a federal tax rate greater than 10 percent on the first $10,000,000 in profits they obtain each year from farming for fish. Congress may want to spend 100 million dollars a year subsidizing the farming for fish industry.