Technology Enhanced Project-Based Learning (PBL) Unit Rubric
|
Individual Lesson
Plans will be assessed using the “Lesson Plan Rubric,” however,
the PBL Unit will also be assessed holistically using this rubric. Your PBL Unit should consist of a series of
lessons that are logically sequenced with each lesson building on prior
lessons. The PBL Unit should be
cohesive and include continuity elements that help students move toward a
final product. Varied resources,
tasks, grouping arrangements, levels of thinking, and products should be
incorporated into the unit resulting in a rich and varied experience for
children. Assessment should be ongoing
throughout the unit and learning should be documented.
|
||||||
|
|
Accomplished
|
Proficient |
Basic |
|||
|
State
&
National Standards
&
Objectives
|
PBL
Unit is interdisciplinary with clearly targeted competencies (including
technology competencies). Standards
are clearly identified and directly correlated with the tasks. Objectives
are developmentally appropriate and aligned with tasks and assessment. Background
information is substantial and clearly reflects the “big ideas” of the
discipline. Key
vocabulary is identified, and stressed throughout. |
PBL
Unit is not interdisciplinary; limited effort is made to connect to other
disciplines or to technology competencies. Standards
are complete and related to the PBL Unit.
Objectives are developmentally appropriate and are somewhat aligned
with tasks and assessment. Background
information is complete and grounded in the “big ideas.” Key
vocabulary is identified, but not stressed throughout. |
PBL
Unit lists items from standards that are only peripherally connected to the
topic. Standards
listed are incomplete and/or not appropriate to the PBL Unit or grade level. Objectives
are not developmentally appropriate and are not carefully aligned with tasks
and assessment. Background
information is incomplete and/or not grounded in the “big ideas.” Key
vocabulary is not identified, and not stressed throughout. |
|||
|
INTRODUCTION Engagement “hook” |
The
introduction is presented in an engaging format that captures the interest of
the learners. The
introduction makes it clear why the unit is important and relevant to the
learners’ lives. Role(s)
is (are) clearly defined. |
The
introduction is presented in a way that is interesting for the learners. Introduction makes it somewhat clear why
the unit is important and relevant to the learners’ lives. Role(s) is (are) not very clearly defined. |
The
introduction is routine and/or does not engage the interest of the learners. The
introduction does not clearly illuminate the relevance of the unit. There
is (are) no clearly defined role(s). |
|||
|
LESSON PLANS (See Lesson Plan Rubric for more detail) |
QUESTIONING (Inquiry): The
learners are encouraged to wonder. Questions
scaffold learning, spanning Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Questions build on prior knowledge. Questions
are used systematically to assess learning and understanding of all
learners. Learners are required to
think critically. ASSESSMENT Directions
clearly and coherently presented. “Checkpoints”
are systematically used to focus and enhance learning. Criteria
for assessing product are clear, substantive, and directly related to
competency goals. Assessment criteria
(rubrics) address content mastery in all products (songs, posters, etc.). Product
requires learners to engage in all levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Content
knowledge is demonstrated, i.e., it is clear that substantive learning
(understanding) has been achieved. |
QUESTIONING (Inquiry): Questions
span the lower levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy—knowledge, comprehension and
application. Questions are used, but
not systematically to assess learning and understanding of all learners. Learners are sometimes required to think
critically. ASSESSMENT Directions are somewhat
clearly and coherently presented. “Checkpoints”
are used on occasion to focus and enhance learning. Criteria for assessing are clear,
substantive, and related to competency goals. Assessment
criteria (rubrics) address content mastery to some extent. Product requires learners to engage in some
levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. There
is some evidence of content knowledge in the final product, i.e., it is clear
that learning (understanding) has been achieved. |
QUESTIONING (Inquiry): The
focus of the questions is knowledge and comprehension. Questions
have one obvious answer (i.e., Is slavery good or bad). Questions
are rarely used to assess learning and understanding. Questions
can be answered directly, with little thought. ASSESSMENT Directions are not
clearly and coherently presented. “Checkpoints”
are rarely used to focus and enhance learning. Criteria
for assessing are unclear, lack substance, and are peripherally related to
competency goals. Assessment
criteria (rubrics) do not address content mastery. Product requires learners to engage in only
knowledge and comprehension levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Evidence
of content knowledge is superficial in the product, i.e., it is not clear
that substantive learning (understanding) has been achieved. |
|||
|
COMMENTS: |
|
|||||
|
DEBRIEFING (Closure) |
Debriefing
requires learners to "step back" and reflect on the process and
content that has emerged (encouraging use of metacognitive
skills). Knowledge
of content, vocabulary, and “Big Ideas” is obvious. |
Debriefing
requires learners to “step back” and reflect to some extent on the process
and content that has emerged (encouraging some use of metacognitive
skills). Some evidence of content knowledge and understanding of
vocabulary and “Big
Ideas”. |
Debriefing
does not require learners to “step back” and reflect on the process and
content that has emerged (does not encourage use of metacognitive
skills). Debriefing
provides learners with little opportunity to review content. Content
knowledge is superficial and lacks understanding of vocabulary and the “Big
Ideas”. |
|||
|
|
Resources
are varied and numerous (including technology). Resources
include relevant information (are aligned with goals, objectives, and
assessment). Resources
encourage reflection. Resources
are developmentally appropriate. Tools/scaffolding
are provided to anticipate a variety of learner
needs. Learners
have an opportunity to learn about and use a variety of tools and resources. |
Resources
are limited in number and/or variety. Resources
include relevant and irrelevant information. Resources
do not encourage reflection. Resources
are sometimes developmentally inappropriate. Tools/scaffolding
are sometimes provided to anticipate the needs of a
variety of learners. Learners
have an opportunity learn about and use some tools and resources. |
Resources
are not directly connected to the assignment Few
or unvaried resources are included and/or used. Resources
and materials do not provide information for students to analyze or
interpret. Tools/scaffolding
are not provided to anticipate the needs of a
variety of learners. Learners
have limited opportunities to learn about and use a variety of tools and
resources. |
|||
|
Graphics & Visual Appeal |
Graphics/visuals
are beautifully done/chosen and clarify, elaborate
on, and enhance learning throughout the PBL Unit. |
Graphic/visuals
are carefully done/chosen and relate to PBL Unit. |
Graphics/visuals
are poorly done/chosen, are extraneous and rarely
enhance learning in the PBL Unit. |
|||
|
Mechanics & Organization |
PBL
Unit has no spelling and/or grammatical and/or word usage errors. PBL
Unit is logically organized and easy to follow. |
PBL
Unit has no more than two spelling and/or grammatical and/or word usage
errors. PBL Unit is somewhat organized
and easy to follow. |
PBL
Unit has three or more spelling and/or grammatical and/or word usage errors. PBL
Unit is not organized or easy to follow. |
|||
|
Technical Competence |
PBL
Unit contains all necessary navigational tools and buttons and/or all files. |
PBL
Unit contains most necessary navigational tools and buttons and/or most
files. |
PBL
Unit is lacking many necessary navigational tools and/or buttons and/or many
files. |
|||
|
COMMENTS: |
|
|||||
|
PBL Units must include the following: _____ Brief overview/description of unit (grade
level, content areas, summary of objectives, and elements of Universal
Design) _____ Table of Contents _____ Credits (that’s you!) _____ Letter to Parents/Guardian _____ Background Information including
field trips, websites, literature, etc.
(research paper, science, only) _____ Annotated Bibliography (APA format) _____ Technology Competency 11.0 _____ 8 Lesson Plans using format provided in
class, with reflections _____ Completed Sample of Learning Issues Board
or KWHL Chart (science, only) _____ Peer Evaluation of collaboration (when
appropriate) _____ A copy of this rubric |
PBL
Unit contains all required items. All
items indicate a thorough
understanding of content and pedagogy. |
PBL
Unit contains most required items. Most
items indicate an understanding of content and pedagogy. |
PBL
Unit is missing many required items. Several
items indicate an incomplete understanding of content and pedagogy. |
|||
Designer(s)
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
Date _____________________ Grade ______________