The study of
UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING
Dr. Rajesh Kashyap (M.D.)

Part 5 .......

BACK

HOME

NEXT

 

OBSERVATIONS

This study was conducted in I.G.M.C. Hospital. All patients presenting with History of Upper GI bleed was included from Dec. 1998 to April 2000. A total number of 111 patients were admitted in I.G.M.C. during the period and all were included.

TABLES OF OBSERATION

TABLE NO. 1

Male Female Total
87 24 111

In our study there were 111 patients out of which 87 (78.4%) were males and 24 (26.4%) were females.

TABLE NO. 2

AGE DISTRIBUTION

Age Group >20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 >70
No.of Pts. 2 11 17 27 26 16 12
% of Pts. (1.8%) (9.9%) (15.3%) (24.3%) (23.4%) (14.4%) (10.8%)

The distribution of patient age in our study is shown in the Table 2. Most of the patients fall between 41-60 years (47.7%).

TABLE 3

MODE OF PRESENTATION OF PATIENTS IN OUR STUDY

Symptom Melena Hemetmesis Both
No. of Patient 16 32 63
Percentage of pts. 14.4% 28.8% 56.8%

The presentation of most of patients in our study was both hemetmesis and melena 63 patients(56.8%).

TABLE 4

FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF PATIENTS WITH DRUG INTAKE WITHIN 48hrs PRIOR TO ONSET OF UPPER GI HAEMORRHAGE

29 26.1

DRUGS PATIENT NO. PERCENTAGE OF PATIENTS
NSAID 29 26.1%
Asprin 9 8.1%
Other 5 4.5%

There is no history of any drug intake in most of the patients 68 (61.3%) in our study within 48 hours of symptoms.

TABLE 5

DRUG INTAKE FREQUENCY WITHIN 2-7 DAYS PRIOR TO ONSET OF UPPER GI HAEMORRHAGE

DRUGS

NO. OF PATIENTS

% OF PATIENTS

NSAID

16

14.4%

Aspirin

6

5.4%

Others

2

1.8%

Nil

87

78.4%

Similarly there is no history of any drug intake between 2-7 days in most of the patients in our study 87 (78.4%).

TABLE 6

FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF ALCOHOL INTAKE IN PATIENTS PRIOR TO UPPER GI HAEMORRHAGE

ALCOHOL INTAKE

NO. OF PATIENTS

% OF PATIENT

No Alcohol intake

98

88.3%

Within 48 hours

8

7.2%

Between 2-7 days

5

4.5%

There is no history of alcohol intake in 98 (88.3%) of patient.

TABLE 7

TABLE SHOWING SYMPTOMATOLOGY PRIOR TO UPPER GI BLEED

SYMPTOMS

NO. OF PATIENTS
WITH SYMP. (%)

PRESENT NO. OF PATIENTS
WITHOUT SYMP. (%)

ULS

78 (70.3%)

33 (29.7%)

Portal HTN

9 (8.1%)

102 (91.9%)

Mallory Weiss Syndrome

11 (9.9%)

100 (90.1%)

Tumors

0 (0%)

111 (100%)

Erosive mucosal disease

2 (1.8%)

109 (98.2%)

History of past upper GI bleed

13 (11.7%)

98 (88.3%)

In our study there is no co-morbidity in most of the patients 82 (73.9%). There was associated illness of cardio vascular symptoms in 7 (6.3%), respiratory illness in 12 (6.3%). Renal disease in 4 (3.6%). History of liver disease in 2 (1.8%) and other illness in 4 (3.6%) of patients of upper GI bleed.

In our study out of 111 patients 69 (62.2%) patients were hemodynamically stable and 42 (37.8%) were unstable at the time of admission.

In our study of 111 patients, there was history of treatment with Antacid in 2 (1.8%), H2RA 15 (13.5%), PPI 2 (1.8%) prior to admission to our institution. No history of any treatment in rest of the patients.

Mild bleed was in 49 (44.1%) patients and severe bleed in rest of the patients 62 (59.9%).

TABLE 8

CLINICAL IMPRESSION AND FINAL DIAGNOSIS PRIOR AND AFTER ENDOSCOPY

DISEASE

NO. OF PATIENTS

Prior to Endoscopy

After Endoscopy

DU

56 (50.5%)

48 (43.9%)

GU

7 (6.3%)

19 (17.1%)

PHTN

11 (9.9%)

12 (10.8%)

EMD

24(21.6%)

13 (11.7%)

MW Synd

12 (10.8%)

12 (10.8%)

Reflux Oesphag

1 (.9%)

3 (2.7%)

Tumors & others

0 (0%)

4 (3.6%)

In our study of upper GI bleed most patients are of peptic ulcer disease followed by portal HTN, EMD and MW syndrome.

TABLE 9

TYPE OF THERAPY GIVEN AFTER DIAGNOSIS IN HOSPITAL

TYPE OF THERAPY

NO. OF PATIENT

% OF PATIENTS

PPI

99

83.8%

H2RA

4

9.0%

EVL

2

1.9%

Sclerotherapy

5

4.5%

Somatostatin/octerotide

2

1.8%

Injection therapy in Peptic ulcer disease patients with stigmata of recent hemorrhage

10

90% of 11 pts.

in most of the patients PPI was given either alone or in the form of triple therapy. EVL in two patient, sclerotherapy in five patients and somatostatin was used in two patients in our study. Stigmata of recent bleed was present in 11 (9.9%) of the patients out of 111 study group. Out of 11 patients injection therapy was given to 10 patients.

TABLE 10

NUMBER OF BLOOD TRANSFUSION GIVEN TO PATIENTS OF UPPER GI BLEED

NO. OF PATIENTS

NO. OF BLOOD TRANSFUSION (UNITS)

% OF PATIENTS

45

0

40.5%

19

1

17.1%

19

2

17.1%

7

4

6.3%

3

5

2.7%

10

>5

11.1%

In our study 45 (40.5%) did not require blood transfusion and only 20 required four or more than four units of blood to keep the patient hemodynamically stable. Four or more than 4 units are required in 8 patients of DU, 5 patients of GU, 3 patients of variceal bleed, 2 patients of EMD and 2 patients of MW.

TABLE 11

FINAL OUTCOME OF PATIENTS OF UPPER GI BLEED IN GENERAL

SURGERY

DEATH

RECOVERED

TOTAL PTS.

3 (2.7%)

7 (6.3%)

101 (91%)

111 (100%)

In our study surgery was required in 3 (2.7%) of patients and death occurred 7 (6.3%) patients and rest of the patients managed conservatively.

TABLE 12

RELATION OF VARIOUS CAUSES OF UPPER GI BLEED WITH AGE

 

DISEASE

Age in yrs.

DU

GU

PHTN

EMD

MW

Reflux

Tumors

Total

20 yrs

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

21-30

4

2

2

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

31-40

9

1

2

 

 

4

1

 

 

17

41-50

11

6

4

3

1

 

 

2

27

51-60

10

6

3

3

2

1

1

26

61-70

9

4

 

 

1

2

 

 

 

 

16

>71

5

2

1

2

1

1

1

12

Total

48

19

12

13

12

3

4

111

Most of the patients of DU lies in the age group of 41-60 years. GU patients most of them also fall in the same age group. None of the patients of DU and GU found in less than 20 years age group only two patients of EMD were found in less than 20 years age group.

x2 = 42.42, p = > 0.05

TABLE 13

DISTRIBUTION OF VARIOUS DISEASES IN RELATION TO SEX

SEX

DISEASE

DU

GU

PTN

EMD

MW

Reflux

Tumor

Total

Male

40

16

8

8

9

2

4

87

Female

8

3

4

5

3

1

 

24

Out of 87 male patients, the most common cause was peptic ulcer disease followed by Mallory Weiss syndrome and portal HTN and EMD. Out of 24 females most common cause is peptic ulcer disease followed by EMD and Portal HTN.

x2 = 5.65, p > 0.05

TABLE 14

RELATION OF VARIOUS CLINICAL PRESENTATION WITH VARIOUS CAUSES OF UPPER GI BLEED

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

DISEASES

DU

GU

PHTN

EMD

MW

Reflux

Tumors

Hematemesis & Melena

32

 

8

6

     

Hemetmesis

5

11

3

4

3

1

3

Melena

11

9

1

3

9

2

1

The commonest presentation of DU patient was both hemetemsis and melena in 32 patients out of 48 followed by melena in 11 and hemetmesis in five. In GU patients hemetmesis was the commonest presentation 11 (18) followed by melena in 9 (18) patients. In portal HTN hemetmesis and melena was the commonest presentation 8 (12) followed by hemetmesis 3 (12) and melena 1 (12). In EMD patients hemetmesis and melena both was the commonest presentation 6 (13) followed by hemetmesis 4(13). In MW syndrome melena was the commonest cause 3 (4).

x2 = 34.69, p < 0.05

TABLE 15

RELATION OF VARIOUS RISK FACTORS AND SYMPTOMS WITH GI BLEED

RISK FACTOR

DISEASE

DU

GU

PHTN

EMD

MW

Reflux

Tumors

Drug Intake in 48 hrs

18

7

4

7

3

2

 

Within 2-7days

9

6

2

3

2

1

1

Alcohol

6

 

2

1

3

 

1

ULS

41

14

3

8

7

2

3

Portal HTN

   

8

1

     

MW

1

1

1

1

7

   

History of past bleed

8

1

1

 

1

1

1

The symptomatology and disease correlation is highly significant with x2 = 19.69, p <0.005 for ULS. Similarly for portal hypertension, x2 = 62.82, p<0.005, for MW x2=36.14, p<0.005 and the correlation with drugs, alcohol and past history of bleed is not statistically significant.

TABLE 16

HEMODYNAMIC STABILITY OF PATIENTS OF VARIOUS CAUSES OF UPPER GI BLEED

HEMO-DYNAMICALLY

DISEASES

DU

GU

PHTN

EMD

MW

Reflux

Other

Stable

34

6

5

11

9

3

1

Unstable

14

13

7

2

3

 

3

Most of the patients of the DU were hemodynamically stable 34 (48) and that of GU were unstable 13 (19). Similarly patients of portal HTN 7 (12) were unstable.

x2 = 23.50, p > 0.05

TABLE 17

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CLINICAL IMPRESSION AND FINAL DIAGNOSIS AFTER UPPER GI ENDOSCOPY

CLINICAL IMPRESS

DISEASE AFTER ENDOSCOPY

DU

GU

PHTN

EMD

MW

Reflux

Tumors

DU (56)

38

9

1

3

2

1

2

GU(7)

2

5

         

PHTN(11)

   

11

       

EMD(24)

7

3

 

10

1

1

2

MW(12)

1

2

   

9

   

Reflux(1)

         

1

 

The correlation between clinical impression and final diagnosis is highly significant with x2 = 236.47, p = < 0.001.

TABLE 18

FINAL OUTCOME OF 111 PATIENTS OF VARIOUS CAUSES OF UPPER GI BLEED

FINAL OUTCOME

DISEASE

 

 

DU

GU

PHTN

EMD

MW

Reflux

Tumors

Total

Cured

46

18

8

13

12

3

1

101

Death

1

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

7

Surgery

1

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

3

Out of total 111 patients 101 discharged from hospital on treatment, there are 7 deaths and surgery performed in three patients.

x2 = 19.89, p2 < 0.05 for surgery

x2 = 32.37, p2 < 0.01 for deaths

TABLE 19

TREATMENT MODALITIES IN DIFFERENT CAUSES OF UPPER GI BLEED

TREATMENT

DISEASE

DU

GU

PHTN

EMD

MW

Reflux

Tumors

Sclerotherapy

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Band ligation

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H2RA

 

 

 

 

1*

3

1

 

 

 

 

PPI

48

19

4*

10

11

3

4

Somatostatin/octerotide

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Injection therapy for PUD with stigmata

6

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* In patients of portal hypertension the H2RA and PPI are given for other associated indications.

x2 = 40.07

p = > 0.05

BACK

HOME

NEXT

All rights reserved with the author, including the rights of reproduction in whole or part, in any form. No part of the publication, images, photographs, design or any other content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording, electronic replication, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright holder. However the study may be quoted and referred to in any other research, medical or allied work or/and project without any restriction.

Copyright © reserved with Rajesh Kashyap, Year- 2000

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1