Assessment Criteria for Fine Arts Lesson Plan
Name ____________________________________________________
Lesson Title:_______________________________________________
1. Evidence of planning / Content Knowledge
|
Unsatisfactory |
Partial/Underdeveloped |
Strong |
Powerful |
|
|
Some
or no planning; no sense of timing, pacing and structure; little or
no materials; presenter does not have a grasp of information; students can
not answer questions about the subject |
Some
planning; some sense of timing, pacing, & structure; much of/all
materials; occasional confusion; presenter is uncomfortable with
information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions |
Good
planning; good pacing, timing, sense of structure; adequate knowledge of
subject taught; all materials are ready; presenter is at ease with
content, but is unable to elaborate in depth |
Plan
obvious; very well-paced, timed & structured; no confusion; variety of
student work provided; excellent knowledge of subject; all materials are
ready; presenter demonstrates full knowledge with detailed explanations
and elaboration |
|
2. Clarity of Purpose / Assessment of Learning Outcomes
|
Unsatisfactory |
Partial/Underdeveloped |
Strong |
Powerful |
|
Not clear; vague; P.L.O.’s missing or incomplete
or does not appear to meet any curriculum requirements; presentation is
not appropriate for grade level stated |
Stated
but no bridging; presenter displays information appropriate to the grade
level but does not appear to meet any learning objectives or vice versa |
Clear
and related to P.L.O.’s; some student involvement; presenter
demonstrates that he/she has met all curriculum requirements and it is
grade level appropriate |
Students
involved in stating purpose; there is a beginning and ending; learning
extensions noted; presentation exceeds all requirements by not only
following the curriculum, but by adding uniqueness and levels of
creativity as well |
3. Implementation of Plan
|
Unsatisfactory |
Partial/Underdeveloped |
Strong |
Powerful |
|
Not interesting; just tells students what they are
going to do; little or no enthusiasm; not age appropriate; no sequence of
information; disorganized; confusing; no movement around room & no
involvement with students; all activity is teacher-centered |
Enthusiasm
evident, however, merely states what they are going to do; inconsistent
enthusiasm; presenter jumps around the plan/teaching sequence; little
movement around classroom & interaction with few students; most
classroom activity is teacher-centered |
Strong
enthusiasm, some attempt at novel intro activity; logical sequence of
information presented; use of at least one classroom strategy; circulates
around the classroom space & helps many students; beginning to combine
teacher-centered & teacher-directed techniques |
enthusiasm,
students intrigued by demo or other activity; logical, interesting
sequence of information presented; a variety of classroom strategies
evident; provisions for individual differences; circulates around room
efficiently and is able to effectively address all student needs;
effectively combines teacher-centered & teacher-directed techniques |
4. Communication (Delivery & Visuals)
|
Unsatisfactory |
Partial/Underdeveloped |
Strong |
Powerful |
|
Presenter
uses no visuals; no use of appropriate props (e.g., classroom music
instruments; guitar to accompany singing); presenter mumbles, incorrectly
pronounces terms and poorly defines arts concepts; speaks too quietly for
students in the back of class to hear; lack of instructions; unprepared
delivery (e.g., cannot “sell” the song, chant, dance, story, etc.);
poor body language/non-verbal cues |
Presenter
occasionally uses visuals that rarely support text and presentation;
minimal use of props; presenter incorrectly pronounces terms and
inconsistently defines concepts; students have difficulty hearing
presentation; inconsistent instructions; minimal preparation of delivery;
inconsistent body language/non-verbal cues |
Visuals
related to text and presentation; presenter’s voice is clear; presenter
pronounces most words correctly and provide clear concise definitions;
strong, clear vocalizing; functional delivery; confident body
language/non-verbal cues |
Presenter
used visuals to reinforce screen text and presentation. Presenter used a
clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms; use of metaphors
and analogies to elaborate concepts; powerful use of voice in all
contexts; powerful body language, presence, & non-verbal cues |
Strengths / What went well:
Things to think about / Questions: