| Deportation of a Ukrainain Canadian "war criminal" | ||||||||
| more info @ http://www.telusplanet.net/public/mozuz/odynsky/odynsky.html Canadian citizenship is highly prized everywhere. So it would probably confound those granted landed immigrant status to know they are better off without it. And it would likely amaze everyone else to know that resident aliens have more rights and privileges than citizens. Wasyl Odynsky came to Canada in 1949, one of the many displaced persons to whom this country became a sanctuary. He worked hard, saved enough to buy a house in Etobicoke, Ont., and then retired. He has been, by all accounts, a model citizen. Now the federal cabinet is debating whether to deport him. Mr. Odynsky, an ethnic Ukrainian, was born into a part of Poland that no longer exists. In 1941, his homeland was overrun by the German army. He was dragooned into forced labour. After escaping, he learned his family had been targeted for retribution. So he returned and was made a guard at a forced-labour camp. In March, Justice W. Andrew MacKay of the Federal Court of Canada ruled that Mr. Odynsky was innocent of any war crimes, in particular, an SS massacre of Jews in his region in 1943. Mr. Justice MacKay, however, did find him guilty by association. Mr. Odynsky is imperiled because of things he is alleged not to have said to Canadian immigration officials 53 years ago. Mr. Justice MacKay wrote, "After careful consideration of the evidence presented, on a balance of probabilities it is more probable than not Mr. Odynsky did not truthfully answer questions that were put to him concerning his wartime experience." Why should this matter? Twenty years ago it was widely believed that Canada was rife with Nazis. Sol Littman of Toronto's Simon Wiesenthal Centre claimed, in a letter to prime minister Brian Mulroney, to have evidence that the notorious Josef Mengele had applied to enter Canada as an immigrant. In response, Mr. Mulroney established the Deschenes Commission; it derided Mr. Littman's claim but concluded it was possible some Nazi war criminals were still here. The Mulroney government passed legislation to allow the prosecution in Canada of those alleged to have committed war crimes in other countries. Only one man, Imre Finta, alleged to have committed crimes against Jews in Hungary, was ever prosecuted. He was acquitted without even having to present evidence in his own defense. The prosecutor admitted afterward that "the time and effort may simply be too great" to warrant further trials. Meanwhile, those accused of war crimes were dying off. Canada's War Crimes Unit opted for another strategy: civil prosecutions alleging that naturalized Canadian citizens had falsified their particulars when they came to Canada. There were two strong advantages to this approach: 1) Criminal standards of evidence would not apply; and 2) Those prosecuted would be ineligible for legal aid. Canadians could now be stripped of their citizenship on a "balance of probabilities." The Federal Court has decided 10 cases; the federal government has won seven. The government's argument is simple and elegant. Immigration officials must have asked Mr. Odynsky and the others about Nazi associations (because that was government policy), and they must have lied (because they would not have been admitted otherwise). |
||||||||
| Back to News main | ||||||||