lawyer from Arkansas who appealed to the lowest elements in the
electorate and had a love affair with the Jewish mass media. Most
voters
hoped for more from George Bush and the Republicans. Unfortunately,
what
we've ! gotten is more of the same. In fact, Jewish infiltration and
subversion of our military and law-enforcement agencies has proceeded
even faster since Mr. Bush took office. Bush certainly doesn't need the
money from speaking fees, but he nevertheless has given virtual run of
the government to Jews. Under Mr. Bush as under Mr. Clinton, what the
Jews want the Jews get, and no one in the government has the courage or
the integrity to challenge this situation.
We talked last week about the FBI turning loose 200 Israeli espionage
agents it arrested in the United States last year and about its refusal
to arrest the anthrax terrorist, who killed five people and terrorized
the whole country with his mailings of anthrax-infected letters. In the
anthrax case the FBI still is putting on a big show of trying to find
the perpetrator. FBI spokesmen claim that more personnel and resources
are allocated to catching the anthrax terrorist than to any o! ther case
except the 9/11 attack itself. I claim that this is all a fraud: that
the FBI knows who the perpetrator is but has orders not to arrest him,
because he is a Jew who carried out the anthrax mailings in an attempt
to cast suspicion on Muslims and generate public hostility against
Israel's enemies. If this became public knowledge, there would be a
substantial drop in support among ordinary Americans for Israel and for
Mr. Bush's current war in the Middle East.
The big question is, why would the FBI go along with such a coverup?
Even with orders directly from Attorney General John Ashcroft or from
George Bush himself, any FBI official who went along with the coverup
would be taking a huge risk. Why do that for the sake of Israel? Who
would protect the FBI people involved if the coverup got blown? The
"partnership" between the Anti-Defamation League and the FBI that both
ADL National Director Abe Foxman and FBI Director Robe! rt Mueller have
been bragging about doesn't seem enough to account for such a flagrant
dereliction of duty on the part of the FBI. Surely, someone in the FBI
would blow the whistle.
Actually, someone has blown the whistle, but you'd hardly know it from
reading the news. Of course, there's been much coverage of one recent
FBI whistle-blower, Coleen Rowley, a special agent in the FBI's
Minneapolis field office, in connection with FBI officials ignoring
reports she sent to Washington headquarters last August -- that was
before the September 11 attack -- about a suspected terrorist, Zacarias
Moussaoui, who was attempting to learn to fly 747 jets. But there's
been
very little coverage of another FBI whistle-blower, Sibel Edmonds, and
the coverage of her far more alarming revelations has been quite
cryptic, to say the least.
There was a story in the Washington Post ten days ago, on June 19,
about
several FBI whistle-blow! ers, one of whom was Sibel Edmonds, who worked
as a translator of wiretapped messages in the FBI's Washington, DC,
office. Despite her name, Edmonds is, in fact, a Jewess. But she is a
rare Jewess, without a very strong sense of loyalty to her tribe.
Indeed, an alarmingly high percentage of the FBI's wiretap translators
are Jews, and nearly all of them who translate Middle Eastern languages
are Jews. Most of these have a much stronger sense of their Jewishness
than does Edmonds, as Edmonds found out when they tried to recruit her
into the Mossad, Israel's super-secret agency for espionage, terror,
and
assassination.
The Washington Post story relates her account of the recruitment
attempts in cryptic language that clearly is intended to avoid
mentioning the words "Jew," "Israel," or "Mossad," lest our gallant,
little democratic ally in the Middle East or its partisans in this
country be cast in a bad light. I'll now read to yo! u the relevant
portions of that June 19 story in the Washington Post. I quote:
