|
Risks of Some Health Problems Are Elevated Among
Implant Users |
|
The Safe And Reliable Choice
In Breast Enhancement
click here! |
The levonorgestrel-releasing implant is highly effective and
generally safe, but is associated with higher risks of some health
problems than are other, nonsteroidal contraceptive methods, according
to a cohort study of women in eight developing countries.1
Compared with women who relied on sterilization or the IUD, women who
used the implant were more likely to have gallbladder disease (rate
ratio, 1.5) or high blood pressure (1.8). The risk of inflammatory
disease of the genital tract, however, was significantly lower in
implant users (0.3) than in women relying on either of the other two
methods.
The study was conducted in 32 family planning clinics located in
Bangladesh, Chile, China, Columbia, Egypt, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and
Thailand. Women seeking contraceptive services who were aged 20-40 years
and had no contraindications to the hormonal implant, the IUD or
sterilization were eligible to enroll. Those who agreed to participate
were instructed to visit the clinic six weeks after enrollment and then
semiannually for the next five years. For each woman who chose the
implant, the researchers selected a woman who was initiating the use of
either an IUD or sterilization and was within the same five-year
age-group.
At the initial clinic visit, each subject received breast and pelvic
examinations, a Pap smear, and blood pressure and hemoglobin
measurements. During subsequent visits, the women received further
testing and diagnostic procedures when medically indicated, and all
complaints, symptoms and diseases were recorded.
In total, 16,021 women were enrolled in the study: 7,977 who chose
the implant, 6,625 the IUD and 1,419 sterilization. After five years,
95% of the women continued to participate in the study, and 84-100% were
still using the contraceptive method they had initially selected. A
larger proportion of women using the implant (85%) than women relying on
the IUD (76%) or sterilization (75%) had ever previously practiced
contraception; 38% of implant users had used oral contraceptives, while
only 28% of IUD users and 27% of sterilized women had done so.
During the five years of the study, implant users, IUD users and
women who had been sterilized all had annual pregnancy rates of less
than one per 100 woman-years; ectopic pregnancy rates were lower than
one per 1,000 woman-years. Thirty-four participants died during the
study period; 22 deaths were due to accidents, suicide or homicide.
Neither the overall mortality rate nor the mortality rate for specific
diseases (both of which were adjusted for clinic) was significantly
greater for implant users compared with those for the other two groups.
Compared with women relying on the IUD or sterilization, implant
users had an elevated risk of gall bladder disease and high blood
pressure (rate ratios of 1.5 and 1.8, respectively), the only major
conditions for which a significant difference was found. However,
implant users had an elevated risk for several other health
problems--respiratory diseases (1.8-3.2), mental disorders (primarily
anxiety and depression, 2.7), and unspecified disorders of the breast
(1.7) and central nervous system (primarily migraine, 2.5). Implant
users also experienced significantly higher rates of certain less
serious symptoms, the most common of which were dizziness, malaise and
fatigue, weight loss, weight gain and headache. The risk of acute pelvic
infection was significantly lower for implant users than for women using
the other two methods (0.3).
The researchers comment that although implant users showed "a
pronounced tendency" toward higher rates of less serious health
problems, there was little evidence of increased risks of
life-threatening conditions. They note that increased surveillance and
monitoring of implant users compared with those using the other two
contraceptive methods may have contributed to the elevated reporting
rates. Apart from a weak association with gallbladder disease and
hypertension, the researchers conclude that the implant is "not
associated with any material risk of major morbidity compared with IUDs
and female sterilization." --J. Rosenberg
REFERENCE
1.
Meirik O, Farley T and Sivin I, Safety and efficacy of levonorgestrel
implant, intrauterine device, and sterilization, Obstetrics &
Gynecology, 2001, 97(4):539-547. |