Teenage Moral Illiteracy

                                                                                         Teenage Moral Illiteracy

                                                                                    Causes, Effects, and Resolutions


         It's a typical day at
Schreiber High School. As you walk down the hallway checking out the classrooms you witness students cursing, showing off their thongs and boxers, copying homework, drawing graffiti on the desk, and smelling like cigarette smoke. They will proudly tell their stories about parties they attended where the cops showed up, how they told off their parents, and personal experiences revealing their sexuality. By the end of the day you've seen three students cut class, one get into an argument with a teacher, detention is full, and litter is everywhere.
         Illiteracy, the "inability to read and write" (Merriam-Webster Online 2004), is obviously not the only problem that exists in many of
America's schools. Today's teens seem to believe that it is acceptable for them to think, feel, say, and do whatever they want. This attitude was the foundation of the Youth Revolt of the 1960s, a time in which many immoral acts, as previously described, became popular amongst high school and college students. "Parents found it difficult to understand their children, some of whom wore hippy clothes, long hair, followed eastern religions, used drugs (LSD/acid and cannabis) and had liberal sexual attitudes... some came into confrontation with the police especially when anti-Vietnam demonstrations turned into physical conflict. Many students went on strike or took over their own universities demanding a say in how they were run" ("USA - A Divided Union 1941-80, Key Question: How did young people rebel in the 1960s?"). A cause for this revolution was the introduction of "personalism... [which] led people to focus on expressing and fulfilling themselves as free individuals rather than on fulfilling their obligations as members of groups such as family, church, community, or country... The emphasis on the individual freedom fostered general rebellion against authority, and, in many cases, a reluctance on the part of authority figures (including teachers and parents) to exercise their legitimate authority" (Thomas Lickona 1991). Hence, the term "moral illiteracy" may be new, however, an arguable cause for today's teenage moral illiteracy stems from over 40 years ago.
         Today, people point their fingers at different reasons for teenage moral illiteracy. Usually, there is not always one source, but rather a conglomerate of sources. This includes all of the facets that make up the media. Television features programs that focus on promiscuous sexuality (Ex- The Bachelor/Bachelorette), movies and video games contain excessive violence, music is filled with foul language, and pornography is popular on the Internet. Environment, including the home and community, can also influence how teenagers behave. For example, there is a very violent youth culture in
New York City, an area known for its high crime rates in homicides, robberies, rapes, etc. A creditable conclusion in this situation would be that teens simply copy what they see around them. Parents are often blamed. It's traditionally the parents' responsibility to teach their children good behavior and morals. However, with an increasing number of latchkey kids and children with divorced parents, the relationships that exist between parent and child are much more time limited.           

         Therefore, there are fewer opportunities for parents to discuss anything, including morality with their children. Many blame peer pressure. Often students are heard being pressured into smoking, stealing, cutting class, etc. However, teens can also be pressured into doing things that are less severe such as cursing and insulting. These things may not be as obvious to being immoral if students see their friends doing them all the time. They are more likely to do it as harmless fun, as opposed to falling prey to a peer pressure attack. Others blame the individual. In the end, no matter what the motive, everyone's responsible for their own actions. Some scientists say that genetics may even play a part in one's behavior ("Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society: Genetics and Human Behavior" 2002). School curriculum, which must be secular and not leaning toward any particular moral philosophy or religion, often can't directly teach good morals. Also in school, the promotion of individualism and free thinking, two of the main motives for the Youth Revolt of the 1960s, is very strong.
         The lack of religion is another probable cause for teenage moral illiteracy. Those who conduct their lives according to the Bible's commands, mainly Jews and Christians, believe God to be omniscient or "possessed of universal or complete knowledge" (Merriam-Webster Online 2004). "God is all-knowing. His directions are always right" (Henry T. Blackaby and Claude V. King 1990). In Deuteronomy, Moses asserts, "Take to heart all the words I have solemnly declared to you this day, so that you may command your children to obey carefully the words of this law. They are not just idle words for you - they are your life" (The NIV Study Bible 1995). ""Life" in this context refers to all that makes life rich, full and productive - as God created it to be" (The NIV Study Bible 1995). From this we can conclude that followers of the Bible see a connection between adopting the Scriptures and proper behavior. They, however, are not the only ones who see this connection. The "nineteenth-century poet, essayist, and thinker, Matthew Arnold saw the Bible as a great work of literature and a means of advancing culture, though he did not hold to personal faith in Christ. But he recognized the importance of the Christian faith as a guide for society and saw the waning of faith as a loss for society" (Ronald Nash 1996).
         Speaking of a loss for society, there exist many consequences to teenage moral illiteracy. It can hurt the self, family, friends and classmates, communities and even nations. Disrespect creates difficult relationships between teens and adults. Selfishness and lying hurt friendships. A cheating, bribe-accepting local government can negatively affect the lives of thousands of residents. Name calling spreads like wildfire throughout schools. A community where many people curse at home and in public can encourage more people, typically younger people, to curse. As sexual innuendoes become more popular on television, the youth of nations will likely take on a similar mindset that premarital sex and affairs are more common and widely accepted, leading them to believe that promiscuous sex is okay. The consequences become more visible and difficult to resolve as more people become morally illiterate.
         School is a sure place to witness many of these causes and effects of teenage moral illiteracy. As the various parts of our society find themselves in a moral slump, educators are finding it more necessary for schools to consider character education. Teens can't make morally sound decisions if they aren't first taught the difference between right and wrong, and therefore, learn how to judge. Character education "involves teaching children about basic human values including honesty, kindness, generosity, courage, freedom, equality, and respect. The goal is to raise children to become morally responsible, self-disciplined citizens" ("Character Education"). Character Counts!, an organization specializing in this system of education works around the six pillars of character, which include "trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, fairness, caring and citizenship" (Background: Purpose 2001). They strongly encourage parental involvement "as with any instruction, effective character education benefits from consistency and repetition, from the family room to the school room to the locker room" ("Background: Approach and Who's Values, What Values?" 2001). They put forth a seemingly farfetched, utopian-like ideal that "If character education is to be effective, diverse groups must work together, society-wide" ("Background: Who's Values, What Values?" 2001). In other words, character education must be taught throughout the nation, in order to experience its full effect.
         Many, however, are against character education. They present a similar argument to John Dewey who explains, "...moral (or character) education is inevitably reduced to some kind of catechetical instruction" (John Dewey 1916). It is argued that schools would be teaching Christian values, which could be claimed a violation of the separation of church and state. Adversaries of character education also say that the system calls for all students to blindly follow authority, similar to the novel 1984 by H. G. Wells. "The idea is to get compliance, to make children act the way we want them to" (James Wm. Noll 2001). They proclaim that students should, rather be given the opportunity to make more decisions as opposed to being repeatedly told what to do. Lawrence Kohlberg, a developmental psychologist ("Lawrence Kohlberg" 2004), says "...children should become autonomous ethical agents, independent of family, church and state…The trouble was its potential for serving totalitarian causes. The methods sometimes employed in forming character were also the methods regularly used by tyrants in indoctrinating the masses... in the wrong hands, habit formation could be used to induce a habit of blind obedience" (William Kilpatrick 1992). More specifically, they are afraid that students will be taught to behave a certain way with a "Because I told you so" authority. "The point is to drill students in specific behaviors rather than to engage them in deep, critical reflection about certain ways of being" (James Wm. Noll 2001). Therefore students wouldn't understand why they have to behave a certain way or follow a set of rules. The system could backfire once they graduate if they are used to being told what to do, and don't understand how to make their own moral decisions.
          When all the debates and campaigning is said and done, no matter how much of a problem moral illiteracy may continue to be, the problem needs to be personally recognized. Each person must have an understanding of their own responsibility to behave properly. Schools, parents, and the government can do everything in their power to help, but nothing will be accomplished if teens don't realize that what they do affects others and that changes need to be made. "Character is destiny" (James Wm. Noll 2001). Not just the destiny of one person, but of everyone else they directly and indirectly affect.



















Notes (as they appear in report):

1) "Illiteracy."
Merriam-Webster Online. Vers. 2. 2004. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. 2004 <http://www.merriamwebster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=illiteracy>.

2) "
USA - A Divided Union 1941-80, Key Question: How did young people rebel in the 1960s?" Para. 1-2. Learn History. <http://www.learnhistory.org.uk/usa/youthrevolt.htm>.

3) Lickona, Thomas. Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility.
New York: Bantam, 1991. Page 9.

4) Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society: Genetics and Human Behavior. Duster,
Troy, Patrick Bateson, and Nancy Pedersen. Homepage. 27-28 May 2002. Uppsala U. 20 Nov. 2003 <http://www.bioethics.uu.se/symposium/2002>.

5) "Omniscient." Merriam-Webster Online. Vers. 2. 2004. Merriam-Webster online Dictionary. 2004 <http://www.merriamwebster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=omniscient&x=19&y=24>.

6) Blackaby Henry T. and Claude V. King. Experiencing God.
Tennessee: Lifeway, 1990. Page 64. 

7) The NIV Study Bible.
Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995. Deuteronomy 32:46, page 281. 

8) The NIV Study Bible.
Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995. Note: Deuteronomy 30:20, page 277.

9) Nash, Ronald. "The Three Kinds of Illiteracy: Moral Illiteracy.."
Para. 33-34. 18 Jul. 1996 <http://www.reformed.org/webfiles/antithesis/v1n5/ant_v1n5_illiteracy.html>.

10) Character Education. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). <http://webserver2.ascd.org/tutorials/tutorial2.cfm?ID=15&TITLE=Character%20Education>.

11) Background: Purpose. Character Counts!. 2001. <http://www.charactercounts.org/backgrnd.htm>

12) Background: Approach and Who's Values, What Values?. Character Counts!. 2001. <http://www.charactercounts.org/backgrnd.htm>.

13) Background: Who's Values, What Values?. Character Counts!. 2001. <http://www.charactercounts.org/backgrnd.htm/>.

14) Dewey, John. Democracy and Education. 1916. John Dewey, Democracy and Education. 1916: Intelligence and Character.
Para. 1. Institute for Learning Technologies. Columbia U. 1994. <http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/Projects/digitexts/dewey/d_e/chapter26.html>.

15) Noll, James Wm. Taking Sides, Clashing Views on Controversial Educational Issues.
USA: Dushkin/McGraw-Hill, 2001. Page 108.

16) "
Lawrence Kohlberg." Wikipedia. Para. 2. 11 Apr. 2004. Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia. 12 Apr. 2004 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg>.

17) Kilpatrick, William. Why Johnny Can't Tell Right From Wrong: And What We Can Do About It. London: Touchstone, 1992. Pg. 113.

18) Noll, James Wm. Taking Sides, Clashing Views on Controversial Educational Issues.
USA: Dushkin/McGraw-Hill, 2001. Page 102.

19) Noll, James Wm. Taking Sides, Clashing Views on Controversial Educational Issues.
USA: Dushkin/McGraw-Hill, 2001. Page 96.


Bibliography (in alphabetical order):


Background. Character Counts!. 2001. <http://www.charactercounts.org/backgrnd.htm>

Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society: Genetics and Human Behavior. Duster,
Troy, Patrick Bateson, and Nancy Pedersen. 27-28 May 2002. Uppsala U. 20 Nov. 2003 <http://www.bioethics.uu.se/symposium/2002>.

Blackaby Henry T. and Claude V. King. Experiencing God.
Tennessee: Lifeway, 1990.

Character Education. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). <http://webserver2.ascd.org/tutorials/tutorial2.cfm?ID=15&TITLE=Character%20Education>.

Dewey, John. Democracy and Education. 1916. John Dewey, Democracy and Education. 1916: Intelligence and Character. Institute for Learning Technologies.
Columbia U. 1994. <http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/Projects/digitexts/dewey/d_e/chapter26.html>.

Kilpatrick, William. Why Johnny Can't Tell Right From Wrong: And What We Can Do About It. London: Touchstone, 1992.

"
Lawrence Kohlberg." Wikipedia. Apr. 2004. Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia. 12 Apr. 2004 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg>.

Lickona, Thomas. Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility.
New York: Bantam, 1991.

Merriam-Webster Online. 2004. Merriam-Webster online Dictionary. 2004 <http://www.merriamwebster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=omniscient&x=19&y=24>.

Nash, Ronald. "The Three Kinds of Illiteracy: Moral Illiteracy.."
18 Jul. 1996 <http://www.reformed.org/webfiles/antithesis/v1n5/ant_v1n5_illiteracy.html>.

Noll, James Wm. Taking Sides, Clashing Views on Controversial Educational Issues.
USA: Dushkin/McGraw-Hill, 2001.

The NIV Study Bible.
Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995.  

"
USA - A Divided Union 1941-80, Key Question: How did young people rebel in the 1960s?" Learn History. <http://www.learnhistory.org.uk/usa/youthrevolt.htm>.

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1