A New Kind of Mad Policy
The below context in not my material. It is by a man that New York Times rated one of the best authors in the last 20 years. He has written over 30 books with million of copies sold. Kim Yook Chan
Because of its soldiers religious convictions
it is more than willing to die in order to attack the U.S. This enemy has no identifiable
country or family against to retaliate. Its followers are dispersed over a number
of Muslim countries, so there is no place or specific people against which to retaliate.
So what does this new kind of enemy hold dear? What is it that he holds so clear
that he will cease and desist rather than lose it?
During the good old days of the Cold War with the Soviet Union, the U.S. kept them
in check by having an arsenal of nuclear weapons that would obliterate their country
if they attacked ours. It was called the the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction.
This brutal but effective policy kept the massive nuclear arsenals of both sides
from ever being used.
Is there a way to apply this doctrine to this new unique threat? I believe there
is.
This new enemy is fanatically devoted to the religion of Islam. Islam holds certain
religious sites
This new enemy is fanatically devoted to the religion of Islam. Islam holds certain
religious sites to be scared and holy. They believe that they are an essential part
of their religion and are enshrined in the Koran as essential to their religion.
Especially the Kaaba in the Great Mosque in Mecca.
On a personal level, a devout Muslim believes that uncleansed contact with pigs sends
him to the deepest hell. We need to let it be known that if we catch and convict
any Muslim terrorist, we will sew him into pig skin, execute him before a firing
squad and bury him in it.
So here we have some things that are of utmost and critical importance to our new
enemy.
So here is my suggestion.
Why don't we let it be known that if any
Muslim, be he a member of al Qaeda or any other terrorist group, launches another
attack on any of our cities, we will obliterate
Medina. If he attacks again, we will obliterate
Mecca and the Kaaba. If he attacks again, we will make Arabia uninhabitable
for 10,000 years.
We face a fanatical and brutal enemy who is religiously motivated. This is a the
only kind of language he will understand. He is a coward that thinks killing innocent
men, women, and children will win him a place in Paradise. So we must
face him with the few things that will truly strike terror in his heart. Otherwise,
we are fighting a war that will only increase in the death and destruction of our
people. It is gaining fanatical followers every day.
Brutal? Yes But effective-you bet! The choice is clear, Do we have the will to survive
or not?
I agree with the first two counter attacks.....I'm
not totally sure about the last plan. We would be killing millions of innocent victims.
However, most of the world already knows if the Terrorists get their hands on a nuclear
weapon they would have no second thought or remorse of using it against the United
States. Therefore I would have to say.....yes go for it.
Kim C