Membership Badge Showcase                                                                                        Chronology of Cambodian History

Memorandum From William J. Jorden of the National Security Council Staff to the President's Special Assistant (Rostow)

Washington, September 20, 1966.

 

SUBJECT
Cambodia

I had an interesting talk yesterday with Ambassador Noel Deschamps, the Australian envoy in Cambodia. He is on two months leave.

The more interesting points were:

1. The most significant development in Cambodia in recent months has been the drift away from Red China. It is the product of several things: Peking's taking Sihanouk for granted; its rejection of his plan to beef up the ICC to oversee his borders; its repudiation of the Geneva Agreements, which Sihanouk sees as a bulwark to his country's position.

2. The deGaulle visit was a plus in one important respect: France has replaced Communist China as Cambodia's "best friend." This relates to (1) above.

3. Sihanouk's principal interest in life is getting the broadest possible international recognition of and support for his borders. (We ought to keep this in mind when and if Harriman ever gets to Phnom Penh.)

4. It was the handling of the recent border incident--rather than the incident itself--that pushed Sihanouk into cancelling the Harriman trip. On a more recent incident--which occurred just before Deschamps' departure--Sihanouk was asked about it; he replied: "That kind of thing happens in war." (I would suggest that Sihanouk's volatility gives no assurance he might not go through the roof on the next one!)

5. Deschamps thinks chances are good that we can send an official visitor to Cambodia in the next few months. Sihanouk is in a mood to welcome such a visit. He wants us to recognize his borders and intercede with the Thai and Vietnamese to do likewise.

6. Sihanouk's main enemies are the Vietnamese and the Thai. He dislikes and distrusts both, the Thai more than the Vietnamese. He is probably less concerned with the latter--for the moment--because they are involved in trouble at home, and Viet-Nam is not unified.

7. Sihanouk would look on Vietnamese unification as a disaster for him. He therefore tends to favor a victory for the South that would leave the country divided, rather than victory for Ho Chi Minh.

8. Internally, Cambodia is doing fairly well in terms of political stability. No major discontent. Sihanouk works hard and constantly at keeping his people happy. The economy is poor--but discontent is low because the people generally don't know how bad off they are. No serious problem of communist subversion.

9. Australia enjoys probably the best relations of any nearby power, despite its involvement with us in Viet-Nam. Sihanouk says he judges Australia--and others--by the way they treat him and his country, and not by what they do elsewhere.

10. Sihanouk has said a number of complimentary things about General Ky, and Deschamps thinks it not impossible that Sihanouk would welcome a friendly gesture from the Saigon Government, especially some kind of agreement on the borders. He is ready to abandon Cambodian claims to disputed islands in return. (The islands in question are really meaningless for both countries.)

Summary: Sihanouk is a diplomatic challenge of the first order. The President's instinct in trying to get something moving with Cambodia is absolutely correct.

Bill

Source: US Department of State

FOREIGN RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES
1964-1968, Volume XXVII
Mainland Southeast Asia; Regional Affairs

 

| GO TO C.O.C.H. HOMEPAGE |

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1