
Lecture notes for 3/8/99
Freedom of speech
-Salem Witch Trials (local level)
-Abolitionists were persecuted in the 18th and 19th centuries protesting
against slavery and other issues (local level)
-On the national level, the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918
prohibited speech that was meant to discourage the sale of war bonds; speech
that was anti-government; speech against the Constitution,
the military forces, or the flag of the United States; and speech that urged
the curtailment of war production.
-Schank vs. United States (1919) and Abrams vs. United States (1919)
-both Schank and Abrams were prosecuted for violating the Espionage Act
of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918
-Gitlow vs. New York (1925)
-In this case, the issue of clear and present danger was often brought up.
-Clear and Present Danger Doctrine
-Involves two elements:
-Seriousness: does a speech create a threat to the state and/or
government?
-Immediacy: is the threat so imminent that harm will happen before
the state and/or government gets to talk about it?
Freedom of Expression
-Expressed rights to speech, media, and assembly
-Implied right
-Symbolic speech: actions other than speech that constitute political
expression
-O'Ryan vs. United States (1969)
-O'Ryan burns his draft card in protest to the Vietnam War and was prosecuted
-symbolic speech not upheld but recognized in this case
-Tinker vs. Des Moines I.S.D.
-Tinker and several other students wore armbands in protest of the
Vietnam War
-Issue of case: does the freedom of speech include wearing an armband
that displays hatred towards the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War?
-Answer: yes
-Symbolic speech recognized and upheld
-Texas vs. Johnson (1989) and United Stated vs. Eichmann (1990)
-individuals desecrated the United States flag
-burning of the flag protected under freedom of speech, considered symbolic
speech