[Please turn Word Wrap on]

Junkers Ju 188 E-1  Version 1.1

An MS Combat Flight Simulator virtual aircraft package   .   .   .

Part of the JamCraft collection by Joe Amodea, a.k.a.  CH_Jam

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kindly take the time to read the accompanying extensive html documentation entitled:

Click_Here_Now(JE-1).htm

I promise you that it will enrich your enjoyment of this aircraft package.

Installation is simple:  

Unzip the package directly into your aircraft folder.  Then be sure to unzip the Gauges_188_3D.zip file directly into your gauges folder.


Copyright Information and Credits:

This aircraft package as a whole is copyright protected and the individual components are copyright protected by the individual respective authors.  Please respect their rights!  The package may not be sold.  Under no circumstances must any money change hands concerning the distribution or use of this aircraft package

The virtual model or MDL
 
At the time of introduction of this package, I have been unable to determine the identity of the creator of this mdl file.  I believe it to be Chris Lampard.  If anyone can help in the origin, I would appreciate it greatly.  It is always my intention to credit the artist or originator and to respect all copyright restrictions.

The Flight Model, Damage Profile and the Texture Art.

The flight model (Ju188E-1.air), the Damage Profile (Ju188E-1.dp) and the textures are owned by the author, J. P. Amodea and may not be used or combined in any other way except by express permission of the author.

Animated gear and flaps by Joe Amodea using Aircraft Animator by Konstantin Kukushkin.

The Sound Files

The sound files are copyrighted by Mike Hambly and were originally intended for the Jumo engines.  They add a distinctive "flavor" or feel to the aircraft as a whole.  Mike is a flight simulator sound file artist of the highest caliber and most of his sound packages can be found at www.flightsim.com.

The Panel:

The panel created for this aircraft package was also done by Joe Amodea a.k.a. CH_Jam.  Please see the additional Ju_188_HiVis3D_panel.txt for further credits and considerations in developing this panel.  Assistance for the "3D" rendering capability of the panel was given generously by Doug Attrell.

Disclaimer:
 
It is certainly my intention to completely respect the rights of all creators and authors.  Any possible violation of any copyright is unintentional.

I have been reasonably diligent in testing this package and I believe no harm will be done to your computer if you use it.  However, use at your own risk!  

I accept no liability whatsoever for any problem that may be experienced upon use of this product!

Now, by all means, enjoy yourself!

Joe Amodea

CH_Jam

JPA_NY@msn.com

Post Script:

Why Version 1.1   Will there be a Version 2.0?

Briefly there was a version 1.0.

Version 1.1 upgrades the panel from 2D to 3D and makes subtle improvement in the air file for pitch stability of autopilot operation at high altitude.

There may be an upgrade package for this aircraft in the future or I may reissue it as version 2.0.  If this is the case, why not wait a bit; why issue version 1.0 at all?

Issues that may require an upgrade or reissue:

First Issue, the MDL
 
At the time that this aircraft package was issued, the original author of the MDL is unknown to me, although as mentioned, I believe it to be Chris Lampard.  I cannot consult with someone whose identity is unknown, but consultation is my desire.  If I can obtain the original afx files for this model, I would like to try my hand at animating the rudder, ailerons and elevator control surfaces.  If it is not too daunting, I may also like to try my hand at putting some real glass in the cockpit and turret.  So this is an open question then as of February, 2000.

Second Issue, flight dynamics or air file.

This is my first "scratch built" air file.  Although I began by basing some of the parameters on a Bruno Duffort G4M1 "Betty" file and I had a lot of help directly and indirectly from Gregory Pierson and Pentti Kurkinen, and although there was really extensive pre-release testing on the part of the CHAPS Flight Test Team, I still believe there may be room for improvement.

I believe most of the static parameters, engine parameters, drag settings and overall performance to be "spot on," or I would not release the aircraft.  I know the climb rate is reasonable and the speed at altitude curve is as good in terms of accuracy as the better CFS aircraft out there.  After all, I have had help from the best.

But there is subjectivity in the roll rate and rate of turn.  There almost always is anyway.

I have located some extensive documentation on German aircraft, but have not received or reviewed this as yet, and upon review and further input from CFS pilots who come to fly this aircraft, I may adjust these two performance factors.

So how did I determine rate of turn and roll rate to begin with in the absence of good information?

I was subjective to be sure.

 I examined two aircraft closely.  I examined Bruno Dufforts B-25c Mitchell and I examined the RAF-662 Bristol Beaufighter.  Originally I thought I would make the aircraft less maneuverable than the Beaufighter and about the same as the Mitchell.

Couldnt do that!

The Mitchell is more maneuverable than the Beaufighter, so possibly one is off relative to the other.

For now, I have chosen to make the Junkers more maneuverable than the Beaufighter, but less maneuverable than the B-25c Mitchell.  It may not be perfect, but it is a good place to start and it may be a good place to finish as well.  The plane has to be fun to fly.  It must be less maneuverable than any single-engine fighter and about as maneuverable as an average medium bomber.  I think I accomplished this?  I invite input from you!

Third Issue:  Markings

The only color photographic evidence I have of a Ju 188 at this time is actually a Ju 188D-2.  The markings here are of that D-2 which was based in Norway and used in a reconnaissance role.  If I obtain good information on an historical E-1, the reissue is virtually guaranteed with the other Issues being covered at the time as well.

Summary:

A reissue may be likely in the future if all of the above "planets" align to prompt me to do so.  But I think I have produced a fine CFS aircraft package as it is and I hope you do agree with me.  By all means let me know!

Joe Amodea,  March 5, 2000.
JPA_NY@msn.com

 