Parallelism structure he uses the same skeleton for each statement only changing the words Caesar to Rome and less to more.
“Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.”
Anastrophe this is because the statement would be more common if said if I offended any speak.
“If any, speak; for him have I offended.”
He is contrasting two ideas here
when comparing Caesar living to him being dead, this means it is Antithesis.
“Had you rather
Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all
free men?”
This is Antithesis because at the beginning it is comparing the things but at the end it changes the tone to being ambitious, I slew him, which contrasts the ideas of Caesar.
“As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honour him: but, as he was ambitious, I slew him.”
This is an example of Anastrophe because the words are rearranged and it is not stated the way that the statement would normally be seen. It makes more sense when said who ever is this rude is not a Roman.
“Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman?”