Kunjalikkutty's PenPeedanam - Sexual Harrazzment in Kerala

Regina makes fresh disclosures - Dec 02, 2004

KOZHIKODE: Regina, victim in the ice-cream parlour case stated today that she handed a letter in court absolving Minister Kunhalikutty in the case because of the influence of three people. She also stated that she gave statement against Ajitha because her husband pressurised her to do so. These disclosures were made by Regina when she came to Asianet office here today. Regina also stated that even her mother seems to have deserted her.

The Main Page

Adv N A Ali Makes Brilliant points on IndiaVision LIVE

On a LIVE program on IndiaVision Adv N. A.Ali, General Secretary of All India Lawyers Union, hit the most relevant issues in the case. In the light of today's and earlier revelations by Regina, if we have a Legal System here, it is imeprative that PK Kunjalikkutty is arrested and brought to justice. Legal System should have taken its course automatic without any intereference from anyone.

According to Adv Ali, there are several cases here. Trying to influence the statement, forcing to change the statement (by the accused in the case) etc are serious offences on their own and case should be taken here. The original Sexual Harrassment Case should be re-opened and charges should be brought against the minister.

Regina's life is in danger. Just like some people wanted the Kiliroor girl to be dead, here too the life of the victim is being threatened. Police and Law & Order should protect the girl.

Today the driver of PKK Kutty is charged. The girl said Kunjalikkutty had abused her and another girl at the same time. Following this the driver abused her. How can the driver be charged and Kutty not being charged? The allegations and one and the same.

Kutty & Co misleading the Media and the Public

Ali said: Kutty and his supporters are misleading the public when they say that Kunjalikkutty has been exonerated by the High Court and the Supreme Court. No court has said Kutty is innocent. The case has never been tried in the High Court or the Supreme Court. What happened was that Kutty & Co were able to avoid and stop any real trial in the case. They blocked the case coming in front of any court at all. Using the influence and money testimonies were changed . Even this was possible only with some help from the Police and the Judicial System.

A related Mathrubhumi report follows:

F-o- dt-kt J-o -l-s ‹-Y-i-,- -i-Q-h-E-E H-r-l-

J-O:- -F-o- dt-kt dx-l-Xg J-ov H-j -l-s -‹-Y-i--i-dw -l-s-T i-Q-h-E-E H-r-l-i -Da-j-Ei-h-X d-k-o J-X-O-Y- J-o-k B-s -‹-Y f-nt f-b-E p--T-Y-iv d-s-ƒ.-

A-j-l->u F--X -l-s-T d-j.- h- d.-J.- -J-ƒ-k--ˆ-i-T -l-s-X C-iw.- k-L-J-h-i -d-V-d--dˆ dx-J-ˆ-Jw d-k-Y-lX J-ƒ-k--ˆ-i-T d-j -d-s-ƒ-ˆ--Y J-o V-i-s-iv d-k-o j-K-d-T-Œ-i-ˆ-.- -F--ˆ J-ƒ-k--ˆ-i ‹-Y-z-EŒ-E- H-r-l-.- -d-&,- -l-s ‹-Y-i--J-i O-.-

d-k-o C-l-T C-j-ˆ-Œ-d Ei-h-X J-X-O-ˆ--Y- -f-n-s-us A-g-g-n-Ju J.- j-J-ht J-T-Y-i A-s-i-O.- -d-X-l o-b-El A-b-J-j-l-h J-ƒ-k--ˆ-i -H-r-l--i-Y-E i-Y-j E-i-J-j-X-l C-k.-

-lt A-j-l->-us d-j,- d-V-d--dˆ dx-J-ˆ-Jw -d-s-ƒ-ˆ-.- A-j-l->-E A-Y-J--X ‹-Y-i--i-Y.- -F-v A-Y h-Ea-~ o-J-j-O-J- F--J- -J-ƒ-k--ˆ-i ‹-Y-i--i-k---Y J-T-Y L-j-l-Œ-T -l-&--X-h- A-V.- j-J-ht d-s-ƒ.-

H-j dx-J-ˆ-i Q-dv J-i-š V--s J-X--E-X -f-nt J--d-i-ˆ--Y.- dx-J-ˆ-J-q-h-i F---k -k-LJ f-‡ f-n-s-E D-i-j--l- -Y-q-i--d-ˆ-ˆ-k.- H-j o-&-i A-Ÿ-E d-s-ƒ-ˆ-k.- -F--ˆ f-n-s-E ‹-Y-i-.-

J-o-h-i Y-Ÿ-q f-‡-d-u i-Y-j Y-q-l-h-k--X h-š -‹-Y-J-qi Q-hu Q-o-e,- hu h-it-h-ji T.-d.- a-ou,- H.- -j-Q-L-dv,- f-Q-E-Z,- A-}w-J-at Y-T-Ÿ-i-l-j -J-T-Y-iv d-s-ƒ-Y.-

J-ov Y-us l-a-J-T Jw--X-h- `A-E-n'- -‹-o-V- J.- A-QY J-T-Y-iv A-gt-Z-O.- A-Q-Y-i-T -A-g-g-n-Ju J.-F-o.- h-b-o-a-E-us l-a dt-Œ-i-i-ˆ-k.- -Y--q Y-T-j.-

h-š ‹-Y-Jw--l- A-V.- T.-Q.- j-Q-u,- j-J-ht -Eœt,- o.-o.- Y-h-o,- l-EQ h-b-lu,- F-o.- l-Q-i-J-ht,- -j-m F--lt p-Q-j-i.-

The Main Page

VM Sudheeran Deplores the Assembly Standoff

VM Sudheeran criticized the govt for spoiling an ooportunity to have the debate. LDF asked for a debate. The Govt said OK for the debate. Then the main issues should be settled. But not in Kerala!!! Then both fought on the time of the debate - a question of 1-2 hours. And decided to dissolve the session and NOT to have any debate at all!

It appears neither UDF nor LDF wanted a debate. Both are playing hide and seek in front of the public.

Deepika report in Malayalam

Ipmenpnsb kwcnpXn\v bp.Un.F^v I\hne \tIWvSnhcpw: kp[oc

tImgntmSv: P\lnXw ]msS AhKWnv Ipmenpnsb kwcnp bp.Un.F^v I\ hne \tIWvSnhcpsav tIm{Kkv t\Xmhv hn.Fw.kp[oc.

Ipmenpn {]iv\w N sNmsX \nbak` A\nnX Imetv \nnhXv Ncn{Xnse Idp A[ymbamWv. Ccsamcp kw`hw \nbak`bpsS Ncn{XnepWvSmbnn. Cu \mn P\ apgph kwkmcnp Hcp hnjbw \nbak`bn N sNm XbmdmIm km \ne]mSv icnb. 12.30t\ N sNq F ]nSnhmin A\mhiyambncpp. P\hnImcw Incmjv{Sobn\XoXambn km a\knemtWvSnbncpp  kp[oc A`n{]mbsp.

aZy\ntcm[\ kanXn bphP\ Ishj DZvLmS\w sNbvX tijw ]{XteJIcpambn kwkmcnpIbmbncpp kp[oc.

Mathrubhumi: 2-12-2004

djOlTY hog_ognX Ak

YjlEdj: Eihog Dd&Jik, hogiX djOlTY AKk QEbdY hpq Aooinu ‹oV hu F.d. ognX Ak. Jƒkˆ‹m oojoœhi JjqŒE AdhEhX Alt dsƒ. oY FJlaiT Eihog htOv oojJiij Alt. QEŸqT ‹mŸw OtO Ou Ot Eihog dxlXgohi f‡h Hj hliX EtŒlOY. CY otjE AdhEhX. C ott oi djƒdJX. hsT eŒhii JrT sQEii dk dldˆ hok oYJwlik, JƒkˆliX kL EkJY. Ekus Jov F.F.FoJt djYdˆdw 24 hXsEv ETdTii. JƒkˆYj dsƒY dldˆ oYiiYJX ETdTiTŒY. D˜uOott oYJwlik EkJY Alt dsƒ.

Madhyamam

…ˆ : ˆ € ž ‡ ŸŠ

ˆ: …ˆ  Ÿ €›   ›™ ˆ ŸŠ.

 .ˆ. ˆ ž ‡ › ˆˆ   ˆ ž›  €. ˆ. ˆ žš. ˆ  ™ ˆ›  ˆ. ›Ÿ › ‚   .

ˆ ˆ  ˆˆ  ˆ  ˆ  ›ˆ. …, ˆ ˜›. ˆ  €› ‡    ›ˆ ˆ . … € ˜› ƒˆ . ›› ‡ › Ÿ›  › ŸŠ žš.

€› ›  ›ˆ. ž ˆ ƒ™ › ›. žž …   €˜› ž› ˆ ƒ. …, žž ˆ  ‡  . ‚ €˜› … €› ›  ˆ. ˆ   ˆ › › ˆ ˆ ›ˆ.

ˆ ˜›› ‡ ›ˆ  ˆ  ˆ › † ˆ ›ˆ  ˆ ˆ € ™ ˆ. ˆ ž ›˜, , ‡, ….ˆ. €ž™‰™, ‡. Š, .. ™, ˆ ž … ˆ›  ˆ ›ˆ.

ˆ ˆ › €›  ˆ. € ›ˆ ƒ ‚ ˜ˆ ™ ˆ. ˆ› ™   ˆ   š ˆšˆ ƒ € €ŸŸˆ› ˆ.…. š™› žš. ˆ ˜› ƒ  ˆ  ˆ› ‡ ˆ  ˆ . ˆ €ŸŸˆ .. , …. ˆ, ˆ.. , .. , › š … .