The Straits Times Interactive

Home Page
Singapore
Weather page
FAIR
High Low
33�C 24�C
| HOME | PRIME NEWS | SINGAPORE | ASIA | WORLD | MONEY | CYBERNEWS | SPORTS | LIFE! | ANALYSIS | OPINION | FORUM | OUR COLUMNISTS |

 
JUNE 06, 2001
WEDNESDAY

7day archive Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday



Breaking News
Browse the headlines
Photo Special
Let's Chat
My Page
Media Works TV Schedule
Weather
Women
Movie Mania
English Premiership
Health
STI News
on your palm
Bookmark this page
Make this your homepage
About Us
Site Map
Log Out

PRINT-READY FEEDBACK E-MAIL ARTICLE
Why ban Jackson's album, Mita?

I AM curious as to why Mita banned Janet Jackson's latest album, All For You ('No to Janet's explicit lyrics'; ST, June 5).

Who are we trying to protect from the sexually explicit lyrics in her album?

Advertisement

I suppose the answer is 'all Singaporeans'. In that case, I would argue that there is an even greater threat to the morality of males aged 18 and above.

This threat comes from the far more intense and explicit English and Hokkien swear words that are uttered in army camps daily.

Surely, if Jackson's lyrics were unacceptable, then the sexually explicit words used in army camps would be likewise.

Should Mita then argue for a ban of such words, on the grounds that they are not acceptable to our society?

KELVIN TAN TUAN WEI

   

 
Copyright © 2001 Singapore Press Holdings. All rights reserved.  Privacy Statement   Conditions of Access   
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1