PARVUM OPUS

Number 5

GHOTI HELL

Maybe you’ve run across this little word game that illustrates some of the peculiarities of English spelling: How do you spell “fish”? G-H-O-T-I ~ GH as in “rough;” O as in “women;” TI as in “motion” ~ fish. Ghoti uses English, but it’s not really English. Getting meaning out of it is a trick.

Now look at what I call a ghoti hell sentence, i.e. an example of typical business writing, and see if it has a real English meaning:

“We synergistically and proactively leverage scalable resources to drive actionable solutions that will revolutionize value-added technology for our customers to utilize in their integration of tomorrow’s mission-critical deliverables.”

I confess: I can’t translate this because I made it up and it doesn’t mean anything. But we’ve all read the same kind of thing. Sometimes we’ve written it.* We want to sound like our peers, and to sound as if we know what’s going on. But this kind of sentence is packed so full of so much badness, it’s hard to say enough bad things about it. Almost every word in this sentence over two syllables is vague, meaningless, trite (add your own adjectives), but I will comment only on some of them.

The words in the sentence are supposed to stand for ideas, as the letters in fish and ghoti stand for sounds. But these “ideas” stray so far from the concrete world that all they can convey is a vague feeling about the world ~ not even that, only a vague feeling about the writer.

True story: I once knew a young man who took over the successful business his immigrant grandfather had started: Acme Broom and Brush (it wasn’t really “Acme” but the name has been changed for the usual reasons). He changed the old company name to Acme Synergistics. Now, you knew what you were dealing with when you saw “Acme Broom and Brush” painted on the side of the building. They made brooms and brushes, and you might have inferred that they also sold other cleaning supplies. But Acme Synergistics . . . who knows? They’re not in the same old location now; did they stop making the brooms, losing synergy and succumbing to entropy, perhaps? I hope not; they were good brooms.

* See Dilbert’s Mission Statement Generator (www.dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/games/career/bin/ms.cgi). I didn’t use it to write the example above ~ didn’t have to; it’s seeped into my blood now.


Copyright Rhonda Keith 2003. Parvum Opus or part of it may be reproduced only with permission, but it is permissible to forward the entire newsletter as long as the copyright remains.

Parvum Opus is a publication of KeithOps / Opus Publishing Services (www.keithops.us).

Feel free to e-mail me with comments or queries. If you don’t want to receive Parvum Opus, please reply with “unsubscribe,” “quit,” “enough,” or something like that in the subject line, and I’ll take you off the mailing list.

Return to KeithOps.


 

1

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1