Number 169
I read
journalist Tom Wolfe's lengthy novel I
am Charlotte Simmons, although I prefer his essays and books such as From
Bauhaus to Our House and The
Painted Word. I'm not reviewing Charlotte Simmons; you can find
reviews and a substantial bio of Wolfe at Amazon.
But I do want to quote from a conversation in the novel where Charlotte
explains to a basketball player what a liberal education means (p. 182) (ignore
Charlotte's habit of making a question out of all her sentences):
[Liberal
is] from Latin.... In Latin, liber means free? It also means book....
Anyway, the Romans had slaves from all over the world, and some of the slaves
were very bright, like the Greeks. The Romans would let the slaves get educated
in all sorts of practical subjects, like math, like engineering so they could
build things, like music so they could be entertainers? But only Roman
citizens, the free people? ~ liber? ~ could take things like
rhetoric and literature and history and theology and philosophy? Because they
were the arts of persuasion ~ and they didn't want the slaves to learn how to
present arguments that might inspire them to unite and rise up or something?
One of the Click
and Clack brothers on NPR's Car Talk jokes about art history majors ~
but now his daughter majors in art history (like one of my sons). I make fun of
myself for having majored in English. These are not the big money-makers. It
would have been more practical to go to trade school (i.e. get a degree in
computer science). Nowadays, the most prestigious liberal arts majors are those
that combine the liberal arts with the ability to make money, like law.
A further gloss
on "liberal" for da yutes: If you read anything published earlier
than the 1960s, you'll find that the word meant something rather different than
it does today.
Also, on
recommendation by reader Fresh, I'm reading Slam
Dunks and No-Brainers by Leslie Savan, an interesting and intelligent
book about what she calls "pop language" (not to be confused with
slang). She writes, "...the first obligation of pop language is not to
help us plumb life's mysteries but to establish that you recognize and can
characterize [slam dunk] any pre-characterized [no-brainer] thing
or situation." That is, pop language requires almost no thought.
In a TV
documentary about the Everly Brothers: "... the enormity of their
destiny." Well, they've had their problems but it wasn't all that bad. I
don't know if there's any hope left for the word "enormity", which
means "that which is an exceeding offense against order, right, or
decency; an atrocious crime; flagitious villainy; an atrocity". It doesn't
mean "largeness" but because it resembles "enormous" people
constantly misuse it. (Go look up "flagitious".)
Bill R. says
he's technical editor for a group of 200 technical engineers, who use the
passive voice all the time. Bill wrote:
I tend to refer to this as the "bureaucratic passive." My dissertation advisor wrote the official history of the space shuttle program under contract to NASA. He observed that, thanks to such constructions, it was literally impossible to determine who approved the CHALLENGER launch.
PS
~ and yes, this is literally literally.
Bill also said
regarding U-trou:
SEALs consider u-trou to be sissy. In 1978, one of my wardroom mates on the good ship William V. Pratt was a former SEAL. He joined up with some of his old SEAL buddies at the chiefs' club in Rodman (Panama Canal Zone). They discovered that he had taken to wearing underwear and removed it, by pulling it up over his head.
How can you do
that? Sounds painful.
You've probably
heard about the atheist Michael Newdow who's filed lawsuits objecting to his
daughter's having to say "God" in the pledge of allegiance at school
(though her mother, who has custody, is not an atheist). Now he wants the word
"God" removed from U.S. money and other government issue. But here's a
thought: If an atheist is an active believer in nothing, that nothing would be
represented by ~ nothing. There's as much or more blank space, or space that
does not contain words or symbols, on money etc. as there is space with
religious references ("In God We Trust"). Therefore, the atheists are
already represented everywhere you see nothing. I don't object to their
nothingness if they'll leave other people's stuff alone.
The notorious
Nigerian scam letters now appear to be sent from all sorts of countries, with
new stories. The originals always had to do with enormous sums of money
orphaned by political disaster. Now people are dying and want to leave fortunes
to charities, via me. How trusting they are. (By the way, did you know the term
"con" comes from "confidence game" in which the con man
convinces you that he has confidence in you, not the other
way around?) Here's the opening of a recent e-mail:
My name is JURGEN STERK, a Swedish national I have been diagnosed with Esophageal cancer. It has defiled all forms of medical treatment...
IT IS TO LAUGH
Jan G. wrote about a few risible words:
I recently heard this statement on a news broadcast about the aftermath of a tornado..."His car was completely destroyed." The word "destroyed" sounds pretty complete to me. I guess there is a state of being partially destroyed, is this a thing correct to say? Oh, the complexities of our language.
I remember in art college having to take some "academics." This was the way many teachers described the classes not art related, but required in order to graduate.
Speaking of "academics," I remember taking a health class where the professor was explaining symptoms of diseases. I don't remember the name of the particular disease he was describing when he said, "The symptom of this disease is sudden death." The reaction to this statement was laughter and most of the class immediately clutching their necks, gasping, "Oh my God, I think I have it!" while pretending to die where they sat. Some of the more highly dramatic went so far as to topple from their chairs. I was not among those who toppled. Believe that and you could own a section of the Brooklyn Bridge...
1. The root of destroy/destruction
is the same as that of construct, and since something can be partly
built, I guess it can be partly unbuilt too. Destroyed is not an absolute such
as perfect.
2. Since
academics also means a member of a university, students are also required to
take the professors ~ the word take is the key. Those little old Anglo-Saxon
words (or in this case, some specie of Norse) say so much: lay hold of, yield
to, carry, swallow ... go to www.dict.org and type in take.
3. I wish I'd
been there when Jan toppled from her chair.
Remember our
Spanish friend the tilde, which makes a sinner into a senor? It's on the key
furthest to the left of your number keys, when you shift. Herb wrote:
So all these years I've been singing Waltzing Matilde when it should have been pronounced Waltzing Ma-Nyee! That's so humiliating. But wait, all the others were drunk, anyway, and singing the same thing.
Silly Herb. But
wait, Fred says this describes his experience of life in general.
Dan E. corrected
something I wrote, and rather than rehash my mistake, I'll do what the
newspapers do and try to avoid further confusion by printing only the
correction. "Incredulous" does not mean the same as
"incredible" but it also does not mean "credulous". I knew
that. That's what I get for working past my bedtime. Thanks, Dan.
SOMETHING
NEW! Check out the new "I Eat Dead Things" T-shirts for dogs and
people in the Parvum Opus CafePress shop, plus a new Parvum
Opus mouse pad! Now you can buy neat products with the Parvum Opus / KeithOps
Catti logo at CafePress.com/parvumopus.
If you buy books from Amazon using the link below, I'll get a tiny commission, and I'd appreciate it.
Link here to look for books on Amazon.com!
NEED A
WEB PAGE? NEED SOMEONE TO ORGANIZE A MEETING OR CONFERENCE? CALL KEITHOPS.
Go to Babelfish
to translate this page into Chinese, Dutch, French, German, Greek, Italian,
Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, or Spanish!
Parvum Opus is a publication of KeithOps / Opus Publishing Services. Back
issues may be found at http://www.keithops.us/.
Feel free to e-mail me with comments or queries.
If you don't want
to receive Parvum Opus, please reply with "unsubscribe,"
"quit," "enough," or something like that in the subject
line, and I'll take you off the mailing list.
Copyright Rhonda
Keith 2006. Parvum Opus or part of it may be reproduced only with
permission, but you may forward the entire newsletter as long as the copyright
remains.