John Glover
This
is probably the case that started my intense interest in serial
killers. I remember the front page news as each victim was found.
The public in Mosman, indeed all of Sydney was in a panic as each
elderly lady was found battered and posed in lewd positions.
The
case was the first of modern serial killers, Sydney would see, and
though police would indeed catch their man, one woman would lose her
life as police stood outside her door in wait.
John
Glover was a loving husband and father, his family had no
inclinations that he was the man the entire nation wanted caught,
yet some say it is because of his mother-in-law and his own mother
that he preyed on elderly women.
On
March 1, 1989 at 3.40pm in the leafy upper middle-class suburb
of Mosman, Glover would kill for the first time. Camelia Gardens is
an apartment block on one of the main roads, Military Road. Most of
the residents were the elderly widows though there were also
families and children who lived in the apartments. When two young
boys left the elevator on the ground floor, they saw a sight that
remains with them still. 82 year old Gwendolin Mitchelhill was
attempting to crawl to the glass security doors at the front of the
building. Blood dripped from the savage wounds across her head. Her
stockings had been torn from her legs, her walking stick and handbag
were further away, her handbag had been riffled.
The
boys quickly sort help, most of the bystanders assumed she had
fallen and hit her head. The neat arrangement of her personal items
were not seen as significant. The blood on the path was washed away.
The
elderly woman was quickly rushed to the emergency ward by Ambulance,
one of the medics suddenly had a thought about the woman's bag, how
it had been looked through but was placed neatly with her other
items. His suspicions nagged at him, so he reported the incident to
Mosman police.
Meanwhile
doctors worked quickly to prevent further blood building up in Mrs
Mitchelhill's brain. Yet on further examination they began to come
to the conclusion that she had not simply fallen, her wounds were
not consistent with a fall, as well as her head injuries she had two
black eyes and several broken ribs. One of the doctors also decided
to contact Mosman police.
Mrs
Mitchelhill lost her battle for life later that same evening. Mosman
police sent the Physical Evidence crew and homicide detectives to
investigate what was possibly a murder. A check of the woman's
handbag found that it did not contain her purse which she had with
her earlier that day.
The
post mortem conducted the next day revealed:
"severe
bruising to the right eye consistent with a fist, severe bruising to
the right shoulder consistent with a blunt object, two wounds to
back of the skull consistent with a blunt object, seven broken ribs
consistent with a fist."
The
cause of death was attributed to her head and chest injures which
were consistent with a vicious attack. There was no evidence to
suggest sexual tampering.
The
Homicide Squad from Chatswood joined the team from Mosman. Someone
had attacked and murdered a defenceless old woman, and police wanted
to find out quickly who it was.
On
May 9, 1989, 84 year old Lady Winfreda Ashton had a busy day. She
had an appointment at the Sydney eye hospital, and then popped over
to the Mosman RSL, before leaving at around 2.30. She popped in to
her local bank, then busied herself at the local supermarket,
stopping to talk to some friends on the way. She then started her
walk home, she stopped at her mailbox and then headed towards the
front entrance foyer of the units where she lived.
Lady
Ashton was found dead later that evening when another resident came
down to the rubbish room. She was on the floor, face down. Her shoes
and walking stick, like Mrs Mitchelhill were placed near by. Her
handbag had been opened and her purse was missing.
Her
injuries echoed the attack on Mrs Mitchelhill. Her autopsy report
read: Large bruise to the head, caused by a blow, bruise to the rear
of her hear consistent with her head being forced to the ground.
Five left ribs were also fractured. However this time her death was
not due to her injuries, this time the killer made sure he had
finished the job before leaving. She had been strangled with her
pantyhose. The marks had cut so deep into her skin that it left
fibres imbedded in her skin. Again no sexual assault was evident.
Police
knew that the similarities in the two attacks were alarming. Both
women had suffered massive bodily injuries consistent with punching.
The two crime scenes were in close proximity (only about 1km apart).
Both women had their purse stolen. And the attacks happened at the
entrance to the victim's residence. Police decided that the two
murders were linked. Now the search was on before the killer struck
again.
The
worse problem was that robbery did not seem to be the motive, both
women had little money with them. The violent attack appeared to be
the reason that the killer struck. So investigators sought help in
trying to provide a profile of the killer.
Police
Consultant Dr Rod Milton a psychiatrist was asked to assist police
in constructing a profile of the offender they sought. The
information was not released to the public.
On
July 9, 1989 Lady Ashton's purse was found in Ashton Park. The woman
who found the purse, not realising the significance of it, popped in
the mailbox of Lady Ashton as stated on the papers inside.
On
October 18 1989 Mrs Doris Cox was found in the front garden of the
retirement village where she lived. She was sitting down, calling
for help, her face covered in blood, she had several grazes on her
face and she lost a few of her teeth. The scene was also washed down
before police were notified the next day. The ME who had examined
the other two women's body checked Mrs Cox's injuries and came to
the conclusion that they were also consistent with being attacked.
her grazes were from her face hitting the ground after being hit in
the head from behind. Though she survived the brutal attack, Mrs Cox
was unable to help police.
The
next murder happened within a month. On Thursday November 2, 1989,
Mrs Margaret Pahud was found along a pathway by a young girl.
Mrs Pahud had been out shopping during the day and had been
returning home when she was attacked. The young girl alerted her
mother and another neighbour who rushed to the scene. Mrs Pahud was
lying face down with her head surrounded by a huge pool of blood.
Someone went to a nearby doctors office and asked for help, when the
doctors arrives they pronounced the 85 year old woman dead. And
again after her body was removed the scene was washed down of blood
before police could arrive. Her bag in it entirety was
missing.
Again
the post mortem revealed striking similarities to the others. Mrs
Pahud had suffered heavy blows to the rear of her head causing a
fractured skull consistent with being struck with a blunt object and
lacerations to face and head. No evidence of sexual assault was
found.
The
bag did turn up later and was handed to police, only money was
missing.
The
killer struck again within a day. On November 3, 81 year old Miss
Olive Cleveland was attacked from behind as she entered the nursing
home where she lived. She was found lying face down across the
pathway . This time however the killer added to his signature. He
pulled up the woman's dress to expose her legs. Her pantyhose had
been removed and where tied tightly around the elderly victim's
throat. Again, like the other victims, her head was surrounded by a
halo of blood. Her personal items, her bag, shoes and glasses were
near her feet. A nasty calling card of the killer. Again in a hindrance
to police the blood was washed away so as not to worry the other
patients of the nursing home.
The
post mortem again resounded the others. Bruising and lacerations
around the head and body, death was due to the pantyhose ebbing tied
around the neck three times.
Police
were beginning to piece together even more clues about their killer.
So far he always struck around 3.00 in the afternoon, and
there were never any witnesses, though Mrs Pahud was out of the
vicinity of the other murders they were all still in a relative
close proximity.
As
each day passed the police felt a sigh of relief that the killer did
not strike, yet that feeling was short-lived and the worst had yet
to come.
Mrs
Muriel Falconer was still quite spritely for her 93 years of age. At
around 5.03 on the day she was murdered she was seen walking back
home after popping in to the near-by fruit shop, bank and a
few other stores after collecting her 'Meals on Wheels'.
However
the next day November 24, Meals on Wheels returned at 11.30am and
again at 1.00pm to give Mrs Falconer her food. But she never came to
the door. A neighbour who became concerned when she hadn't seen the
93 year old all day decided to go and check to make sure she was
alright.
After
knocking a few times, she used the spare key to let herself in. The
sight that met her sent her running for police. Mrs Falconer was
lying face down in the hallway. She had been stripped of her clothes
from the waist down, and her dress and petticoat had been pulled up
over her head- which did nothing to conceal the large pool of blood
stemming from the wounds she had suffered.
Her
shoes and shopping were at her feet and her purse was open.
The
post-mortem revealed the same afflictions as the others in the
string of murders the media dubbed the "Granny Killings".
Mrs Falconer had been beaten, her head sustained severe injuries,
including fractures in three places. Her face also contained several
broken bones. Her pantyhose and belt from her dress were wrapped
tightly around her tiny throat.
This
time, the killer had murdered inside a victim's home. Therefore the
scene was perfectly preserved albeit from the neighbour and a doctor
checking for any sign of life of the woman.
The
police did have a small break-through on this case. In the hallway
the killer had stepped in the victim's blood on his exit and had
left some bloody footprints. (These would later be checked against
Glover and found to be a match.)
One
young man became a suspect, a known psychotic he was seen in the
vicinity of a few of the murders and was also picked out by
witnessed in photo line-ups. The suspect was never eliminated from
police enquiries.
The
task force responsible for the case, decided to change tact. They
requested from all near-by police stations records of any elderly
women being attacked. Several were forwarded to the detectives and a
common description of the unknown assailant appeared. The suspect in
all recent assaults had been a White Male, aged about 50 years with
grey hair.
Two
reports also stuck out from the rest. 85 year old Mrs Margaret
Todhunter was walking home when a man walked past her then turned an
struck her in the back of the head, as she fell to the ground the
"grey haired man" grabbed her bag and fled the scene. She
survived with only eight stitches required to the wound. Her
description of the man was quite thorough. She said he was Male, 50
years, 5'7", grey hair, well-kept, broad shoulders, thick
chest, large stomach, and wore a white business shirt and cream
trousers.
This
description fitted Glover perfectly, it was his first attempt at an
attack.
The
second report that drew interest was that of 82 year old Mrs
Euphemia Carnie on August 25, 1989. When returning to her residence
at North Haven Retirement Village was punched in the chest and
knocked to the ground. Her attacker took her handbag and drover away
in a blue car. She suffered severe bruising to her ribs, chest and
back of the head. Her description of her assailant matched that of
Mrs Todhunter.
On
January 11, 1990 another elderly patient, Mrs Daisy Roberts, at Greenwich
Hospital was assaulted. Mrs Roberts said that a grey haired male
entered her room and placed his hands under her night-dress and held
her breasts, claiming she was losing body heat. He then walked away.
When hospital authorities was contacted they informed police of the
incident. One nurse said she had earlier spoken to the
Four-and-twenty pie salesman who was in an area of the hospital he
shouldn't have been. When challenged about the assault on Mrs
Roberts, he denied the allegation and quickly left. The man was John
Glover.
Police
were quick to find Glover to question him about the assault on Mrs
Roberts. He was asked to attend Chatswood Detectives office at 5pm
pm January 13, 1990. After waiting an hour for him, police decided
to call his house. His wife answered and said that her husband had
attempted suicide and was now in Royal North Shire Hospital. The
suicide note Glover had written included references to "no more
grannies" and "Essie started it".
Due
to his mental state the officers were not able to interview him that
evening, and when they returned they next day he refused to make any
admissions on legal advice. He did however admit to being at the
Greenwich Hospital on January 11. Glover also allowed the detectives
to take a Polaroid photo of him. He was identified by the women as
their attacker.
From
then on, Glover was the main suspect in the Granny Killings. The
police decided to not question Glover anymore, in fear it may scare
him off. They kept a vigil at all times, as they furthered their
enquiries into his background and history.
The
"Essie" referred to in the suicide letter was Veronica
Rolls, Glover's mother-in-law. It appears that Mrs Rolls had lived
with her daughter and son-in-law for thirteen years until she moved
into a nursing home in 1988. She died on January 21, 1989 in the
home.
Glover's
own mother had also died recently. She passed away on October 11,
1988. The weight of these deaths seemed to have been a catalyst for
the Granny murders. It appears that he had hated his mother for
leaving his father and re-marrying, and he also had a deep-seeded
hatred for his mother-in-law.
Glover's
employment with Four-and-twenty pies meant he was responsible for
the entire North Shore area. He covered the areas involved in the
murders.
But
now police needed the hard evidence. Surveillance was set-up and
police watched as he would stop time and time again. Police decided
to use a new tracking device that was currently being trailed, with
permission from Four-and-twenty they had the Quiktrack device fitted
to Glover's vehicle.
When
police returned to ask further questions about assaults at a few of
the nursing homes in connection with Glover, one receptionist
interviewed stated that she was in fact John Glover's wife and he
had denied all the allegations. She also said she would tell her
husband that police were questioning people about him. Detectives
knew then that they needed to move a little quicker now, they feared
that he may now quieten down until the heat leaves.
But
this was not the case. Fours days after their talk with Mrs Glover
on March 19, 1990, police tracked Glover all over Mosman and
Balmoral. At 10.30am he stopped his car, fixed his hair, put on a
tie, gabbed a briefcase and entered a dwelling. Police first assumed
that he was meeting with his solicitor, but stayed in wait.
Later
in the afternoon, two boys attempted to also enter the property, when
they found the gate locked, they went and got a neighbour to help
them to no avail. A dog inside the premises was barking.
Something was wrong.
Using
the dog as a reason to investigate police went to the door to
question the occupant about the dog's noise. The door was locked, so
they went to the rear of the property and through a glass door could
see a hammer and what looked to be blood on the carpet of the front
landing.
Police
then forced the front entry to investigate. The body of Joan
Sinclair was found just inside the door. Near the body was a
bloodstained claw-hammer. Mrs Sinclair's head was wrapped in a towel
and her lower clothes had been removed. Again her pantyhose were
tied around her neck.
Detectives
knew they needed to still be careful, Glover must still be in the
house. He was found in the bathroom. He was semi-conscious and naked
in the bath. Glover was vomiting and moaning, his face was partially
submerged in the water. Paramedics were called, who declared Mrs
Sinclair dead and then treated Glover for alcohol and drug overdose.
Glover
was moved to Royal North Shore Hospital and placed under police
guard. Mrs Sinclair's post-mortem report stated she had suffered
multiple head wounds from a blunt object - the claw-hammer found at
the scene.
Though
there were many dissimilarities between the Sinclair murder and the
granny murders, there was enough evidence to suggest they were
all linked.
In
hospital on March 20, 1990, Glover was briefly interviewed about the
murders of the six women and the attempted murder of Mrs Cox. Glover
admitted to committing each murder and the attempted murder. Later
that day Glover was formally charged with the murder of Mrs Sinclair
and they made arrangements for further interviews on his discharge
from hospital.
On
March 28, 1990, Glover appeared at the Glebe Coroners Court where he
was formally charged with 14 offences: 6 counts of first degree
murder, 1 count of attempted murder, 1 count of robbery with
wounding, 1 count of robbery, 4 counts of indecent assault and 1
count of assaulting a female.
On
Friday November 29, 1990 Glover was found guilty on all accounts and
sentenced to prison for the term of his natural life. Glover showed
little emotion as Justice Woods passed sentence.
Bibliography:
- The North Shore Murders Taskforce file
Photos of the murder scenes coming soon
Case written by Korey Sifuentes