Why is this Idiot still running the country? We try to impeach one president for the faults within his personal live (which the public has no business getting into in the first place), and then fail to even make an attempt to get rid of one illogical, trigger happy man that won't rest until everyone in the world is dead.

I saw a news report the other day that stated that the CIA information that Bush used to go to war in Iraq was all data from the early 90's. None of it was recent. Why doesn't it surprise me that our stupid government fails to go through the necessary steps before endangering other peoples lives. No, we're not heartless, and we're not absolute dictators, we just don't have officials with BRAINS!

Now, they've finally made it publicly known that there was no tie with Al Queda and Iraq. This part, the CIA was directly telling Cheney and Bush... they were just too stupid to listen. Of course, I knew from the beginning what the "war" was really about. One man's greed for oil, and want of some sort of revenge over what happened in Desert storm. Someone should tell officials that they are not supposed to be working for themselves, but for the good of the country as a whole.

And has he done this?

Hell no!

Our economy has gone even further down because he's wasting money on a war that didn't need to be fought. ...meanwhile, did we find the real criminal? Osama... remember his name?

Dumb-ass politician: you couldn't see the truth if it bit you in the ass! Not only have you done what most politicians do (put themselves as the top priority), but you have actually endangered America by making everyone else in the world angry with us.

So much for diplomacy. Our country now has many enemies, and has hit an all-time low in the opinions of foreigners. We might as well start becoming self sufficient again...'cause no one else is going to trade with us. No one else is going to help us when the Middle Eastern people finally get ticked off enough to fight back, either.

_ _ _ _ _

Another Topic: gay rights

Excerpt:

Bush singled out Massachusetts' Supreme Judicial Court, which called marriage an evolving paradigm. "That sends a message to the next generation that marriage has no enduring meaning, and that ages of moral teaching and human experience have nothing to teach us about this institution," he said.

Is not the meaning of marriage "love"? Why should love be so caged as to be only between a man and women.

Homosexuals are people too! They have feelings, and they can love, so why the hell are they not allowed to marry when their love grows?

Lets face it people: there are plenty of homosexuals out there who probably have healthier relationships than some heterosexual couples. They have to deal with bigotry constantly, and yet they hold on.

Heterosexual couples are divorcing all of the time, and yet, I bet you those other homosexual couples would stay together far longer if they were actually allowed to marry. It is already hard enough for them to even find someone with the ratio of homosexuals being much smaller, but when they do it produces a long lasting relationship that might as well be a marriage. Why shouldn't they be allowed to have the legal rights, and the name that their relationship already represents?

Bush calls a ban on marriage being the only "moral" thing to do. ... well quite frankly, it's not moral to deny a union of people who love each other, just as it is not moral to go around and bomb a country without the evidence to back up his weak claim.

_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

Bush has shown himself to be racist and bigoted. He is a danger to the well being of this country his lack of morals, dignity, and diplomacy tactics.

I know one thing for certain: I do not want him up there to make anymore damage than he already has.

Remodel the White House, folks: get rid of the Bushes.