Home vs. AwayHave you ever tried to figure out why the road teams of the SL seem to have a better record than home teams? Is it a particular managing style? Is it something inherent in the BBW game? Is it something particular to the makeup of a draft league such as ours? My belief going into this study was that in the years with lower offense, the home team won more. I theorized that more runs were scored in the 1st inning of the bigger offensive years, and the away team was scoring a majority of those runs, which translated to more away wins in those seasons. Here is the breakdown of runs per inning, total home won-loss record for the league, and runs per game for the league in our 8 seasons of data:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
2003 924 739 864 799 834 708 687 745 452 159 6911
13 11 13 12 12 10 10 11 7 2
2003 HW-L 375-354 .514
2003 RPG 9.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
2002 1128 848 896 800 864 852 807 715 563 147 7620
15 11 12 10 11 11 11 9 7 2
2002 HW-L 358-371 .491
2002 RPG 10.9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
2001 1118 889 889 901 823 928 877 820 628 128 8001
14 11 11 11 10 12 11 10 8 2
2001 HW-L 352-377 .483
2001 RPG 11.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
2000 1105 909 996 816 825 863 863 703 523 136 7763
14 12 13 11 11 11 11 9 7 2
2000 HW-L 376-353 .516
2000 RPG 10.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
1999 918 728 854 810 823 803 764 731 551 152 7134
13 10 12 11 12 11 11 10 8 2
1999 HW-L 362-367 .497
1999 RPG 9.8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
1998 886 642 776 710 780 784 689 655 510 101 6533
14 10 12 11 12 12 11 10 8 2
1998 HW-L 361-368 .495
1998 RPG 9.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
1997 861 644 771 708 692 724 643 574 468 125 6210
14 10 12 11 11 12 10 9 8 2
1997 HW-L 295-354 .455
1997 RPG 9.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
1996 649 489 563 505 475 482 439 412 336 93 4443
15 11 13 11 11 11 10 9 8 2
1996 HW-L 262-244 .518
1996 RPG 8.8
Yes, the vistors do own an edge on home teams, with the home team record at 2741-2788 (.496). So was my theory about the higher scoring years true? In the 4 higher scoring seasons (1999-2002), the visitor actually fared worse ... in these seasons, the home team had a slightly higher .497 winning percentage. It is true that in the two seasons when the lesser percentages of runs were scored in the 1st (1999 and 2003), the home team had a better overall percentage of .505, but that may be too small of a sample size to make substantial conclusions. To me, 2003 could be categorized as a much better relief year than in the other seasons since 1998, but a higher percentage of runs were scored in the 8th inning of 2003 than in any other season. That could be nothing in and of itself, but there were more runs scored in extra-innings in 2003 than in any other season. Again, by itself, it might not mean anything. Combined with the 8th inning percentage, it just makes me want to rethink things. Going back to my original theory, 1996 was the lowest scoring season, and it yielded the best winning percentage for the home team. But contrary to my theory, that season produced one of only two seasons where 15% of the runs were scored in the 1st. I do recall 1996 as a great relief year, so maybe the strength of the league's relievers does have something more to do with home team success than other factors. Was 1997, the year of the home team's worst winning percentage, an especially bad relief year? It's hard to think of how to measure it ... total blown saves? standard deviation of relief ERA compared to starting ERA? average grade of relievers vs. average grade of starters, pro-rated by innings? That will have to wait for another time. For now, I'll just end the discussion, question still unanswered, leaving you to draw your own conclusions. | << Back | Main 2003 Notes Page | |