Posted by Dublover [LovesDubs] on November 30, 1999 at 08:29:27 {JEfy6n1mcI0hi4VK0MIQSQBW4HHNMw}:
In Reply to: Bloodless Surg. 1/8 Awake posted by Liberal Elder on November 29, 1999 at 17:02:10:
It seems to me if it was WITNESSES the Society was trying to reach, they would have put this information into the WATCH TOWER and not the sister magazine Awake, which we all know is meant for the world to read because the Watch Tower would be too incredibly in depth and boring for the average reader out there. This is strictly another PR article to make them appear to have some special knowledge. Perhaps tho, they have at least chosen some people to quote who havent been DEAD for 3-400 years already this time LOL!!! It has become readily apparent that their stand is no longer a Biblical one. There should be NO need to even discuss the "dangers of blood" if their stand was 100% Biblical. It should be two paragraphs long, contain all the 100% clearly defined Bible BANS and GOD's PROHIBITIONS against the taking in of blood under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES...and that would be it :) Having failed THAT test...they have resigned themselves to this childish plan of trying to defend now that even if it isnt Biblical really, that hey its a dang good idea isnt it?? Huh?
Hey Miltie...why dont you just ADMIT you were playing ball in the house and you broke the lamp? Say it, apologize for it, dont do it AGAIN and get ON WITH YOUR LIFE and let others GET ON WITH THEIRS.