Posted by LA [LostAgain] on November 29, 1999 at 11:21:04 {DGglKT6Uj2sSqKAT2C6kaZ/tHSuuOs}:
In Reply to: ***our recent co visit posted by AF on November 29, 1999 at 10:53:55:
Hey AF,
:Are you talking about where JW-critics discuss it?
YUP this one.
:If the latter, the argument against JW claims is very simple: first the JWs have to prove that they are in the seat of Moses.
I asked for simple but this is avoiding the issue
totally (smile).
JW believe GB sits in Moses' seat, right?, So the
critic,especially if one of their own, must assume
the burden of proof.If you were an active JW could you prove that speaking against GB is not an act of disloyalty to God and is not apostacy.
I suppose my question is;
IS their a palatable, agreeable way to express this without getting the witness on a defence and /or sounding anti-JW (apostate)?
What could an insider say without raising
undue suspicion and coming across as a dissenter.
Understand? If not let me sleep on this one maybe
I could articulate differently.
LA