Posted by tk [tk] on November 29, 1999 at 07:11:53 {DGglKT6Uj2w5Aot.c.AgLQNoO6iBDc}:
In Reply to: IBELIEVE:CHRONOLOGY BASIC posted by 70-WEEKS on November 29, 1999 at 00:20:34:
Are you saying that 1992 is to replace the 1914 date?
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
Subject: **IBELIEVE:CHRONOLOGY BASIC
Comments:
Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: