Posted by I,m sorry ... [1] on November 28, 1999 at 18:03:13 {hcnmikA.FkoLB7Y6H2dwO5mu/o1Vh.}:
In Reply to: Question for 1 posted by Zadok on November 28, 1999 at 16:50:19:
if i wa not clear in my post sorry bout that
what i did was to post a quote from:
*** w57 6/15 370 Overseers of Jehovah's People ***
It is vital that we appreciate this fact and respond to the directions of the “slave” as we would to the voice of God,
because it is His provision.
as you can see they stated basically IF IT'S IN PRINT JAH HAS SPOKEN at least that how any loyal jw is to view anything coming out of brooklyn
well in the 1-1-00 they list all these dogmas they have needed to flipflop on and i merely was making the point that with all those errors they bear no resemblance to THE VOICE OF GOD SPEAKING
for if so they would have got the info right the first time
just think, all the dogmas listed in the 1-1-00 were scriptualLY wrong the day they CAME OFF THE PRESSES doesn't sould like the voice of god to me more like THE OPINIONS OF MEN MASQURADING around claiming they got thier info from god but the passing of time has shown over and over that wt all to many times spouts for OPINIONS OF MEN dressed in Prophet clothes i hope that i cleared up the matter if not just let me know. 1 NOW THAT is pretty strong( or some may say Arrogant) by anyones standard to say to folks: "Look you need to follow our directions as if God himself spoke them" we had been looking over the 1-1-00 where the society makes confessions to the faCT THAT what they spoke over since when god speaks he gets it right
it's statements like this that cause honest hearted folks to ask questions .
this afternooon my wife and i had some friends over for dinner. my wife told the sister that as a jw one is expected
to do whatever they are told thru the publications and the sister felt otherwise- so my wife showed her this quote
and the sister couldn't beleive it.
the yrs bears no resemblance to THE VOICE OF GOD