Posted by IBelieve [IBelieve] on November 28, 1999 at 12:56:35 {hcnmikA.FkstjQMitR4AULlY2o3p66}:
In Reply to: *Q for Bibleman posted by Bibleman on November 28, 1999 at 06:49:51:
Bibleman,
Thank you for these references. And a thanks to AF for his suggestions as well. My main purpose for asking this was so that we could have a neutral source(s) to reference anything stated by any side in a chronology debate.
For instance, you and Jan, or AF get into it over chronology. Then we could just compare notes from the neutral sources and go from there. Of course you believe you're right. Of course Jan thinks he's right, of course AF thinks he's right. But how many people can be right and have completely different takes on something on the same subject? Debates on chronology get about the same as debates on religion. Everyone thinks they are right, everyone else is wrong. To me that's BS. SOMEBODY is wrong. I want sources to quote to try to provide evidence that either someone is right, or evidence that someone is wrong.
I will note your information and try to compile it into a webpage to put on my page for when it opens. I think it can be a good source for people to get differing opinions so they can make up their own minds as to who is right. But I will try to see if even ONE University or something has some info on it. If you find any sites, let me know.
Thanks!
IBelieve