Posted by DaJahVeu [DaJahVeu] on November 27, 1999 at 15:08:33 {nwG7wj0NI.ZREPDAWGQ2oEhE92Gn1k}:
In Reply to: *********H20 IT'S CLOSING TIME!!! posted by OneGlove on November 27, 1999 at 13:23:18:
That's exactly right. I can't say anything of proof, because you've offered none. I have tons of those references you presented me that I can give right back to you, but all that proves is I have more information that you.
Any geologist that is unbiased will tell you that the fossil records prove nothing of evolution of a common ancestor. The animals and plant life appears suddenly, and there is NO such thing as a HORSE WITH TOES. But yet, you have all this proof that you talk about and never show. Did you even look at the information you presented. Do you know about all the GAPS that the one Lady was presenting, and was filling in with theories of her own? You probably didn't even see this did you?
We haven't even discussed the empirical aspects of evolution, which by it's very nature should show you that the theory itself by definition is unscientific.
I will state this again, if you have proof please present it. If a Horse ever had toes, three legs, toes on its back hoofs, or any combination of such, then the time frame that evolutionist ask you to believe it took for all these micro-evolutionary changes to produce one macro-evolutionary change would be present in the fossil record. Wouldn't you agree? Please show ONE case of this.