# *****our recent co visit

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Farkel [Keflar] on November 29, 1999 at 15:15:07 {DGglKT6Uj2jc7.1TE24IvhKqcjatLo}:

In Reply to: ****our recent co visit posted by LA on November 29, 1999 at 11:21:04:

:So the critic,especially if one of their own, must assume the burden of proof.

Not at all. The one making the claim is always the one faced with the burden of proof, and extraordinary claims (like sitting in the seat of Moses) require extraordinary proof.

If it were otherwise, then we would have to assume that Bibleman is the Messiah returned, since that is his claim, and we would be faced with the impossible task of proving him wrong.

Simple as pie!

Farkel

Follow Ups:

- ******our recent co visit all4love 19:04:42 11/29/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: ******our recent co visit

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]