# *********Question for 1

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by AF [AF] on November 29, 1999 at 19:36:19 {DGglKT6Uj21EwaxRomAMdaOt1gg/Zk}:

In Reply to: ********Question for 1 posted by Zadok on November 29, 1999 at 11:37:59:

Answering involves giving answers, not references to material you merely claim gives answers. We already know how people like Stafford play this game -- they say, "read my book" or "read The Watchtower" without giving specific answers, and then when the questioner comes back from reading the mass of material, with what he thinks the answers are, the "answerer" claims, "No, no, no! You've got it all wrong!" And then he proceeds to derail the discussion by going off on all sorts of tangents designed (unconsciously) to avoid answering the questions.

So let's have some straight answers from you on the questions asked. You can refer to any material you want for backup or as source references, but if you want credibility on this or any other non-JW forum you're going to have to answer in your own figgin' words. Do you understand now?

AF

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: **********Question for 1

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]