# ****our recent co visit

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by LA [LostAgain] on November 29, 1999 at 11:21:04 {DGglKT6Uj2sSqKAT2C6kaZ/tHSuuOs}:

In Reply to: ***our recent co visit posted by AF on November 29, 1999 at 10:53:55:

Hey AF,

:Are you talking about where JW-critics discuss it?

YUP this one.

:If the latter, the argument against JW claims is very simple: first the JWs have to prove that they are in the seat of Moses.

I asked for simple but this is avoiding the issue
totally (smile).

JW believe GB sits in Moses' seat, right?, So the
critic,especially if one of their own, must assume
the burden of proof.If you were an active JW could you prove that speaking against GB is not an act of disloyalty to God and is not apostacy.

I suppose my question is;

IS their a palatable, agreeable way to express this without getting the witness on a defence and /or sounding anti-JW (apostate)?
What could an insider say without raising
undue suspicion and coming across as a dissenter.

Understand? If not let me sleep on this one maybe
I could articulate differently.
LA

Follow Ups:

- *****our recent co visit AF 19:18:38 11/29/99 (1)
  - ******our recent co visit LA 10:45:21 11/30/99 (0)
- *****our recent co visit Farkel 15:15:07 11/29/99 (1)
  - ******our recent co visit all4love 19:04:42 11/29/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: *****our recent co visit

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ FAQ ]